Theory and Society

, 40:669 | Cite as

“Sustainable consumption” as a new phase in a governmentalization of consumption

Article

Abstract

With the rise of environmental themes and the increasing support of the “sustainable development” objective, public institutions have shown a renewed interest in the sphere of consumption. During the 1990s, a new dimension in public regulation was developed for the more downstream part of economic circuits, precisely to eliminate the negative effects of consumption and to be able to subject it to criteria of “sustainability.” The initiatives taken thus far have in fact mainly targeted the general population, primarily considered as a set of individual consumers. The latter are expected to become aware of their share of responsibility in the pressures exerted on natural resources and environments, and thus of the need to adapt their consumption habits in order to improve the situation. This article proposes to seize this dynamic, which seems to be expanding. It examines the discursive and programmatic frameworks, which together redefine the role of both the consumer and the citizen to arrive at an individual who can be interested and mobilized in favor of new recommendations. It analyzes the logic from which an effort attempting to make acts of consumption conform to renewed requirements has been established in its wake. This allows for a better understanding of the institutional devices that have been favored, in particular insofar as they appear to be the result of a constrained space of possibilities. In brief, it is a governmentality that tends to be deployed, although it is also likely to give rise to tensions.

Keywords

Citizenship Consumption Environmental responsibility Governmentality Public awareness Sustainability Sustainable consumption 

References

  1. Baudrillard, J. (1981). For a critique of the political economy of the sign. St. Louis: Telos Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baudrillard, J. (1998). The consumer society. Myths and structures. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Beretti, A., Grolleau, G., & Mzoughi, N. (2009). How cognitive biases can affect the performance of eco-labeling schemes. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization, 7(2), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boström, M., & Klintman, M. (2008). Eco-standards, product labelling and green consumerism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourseiller, P., & Jankéliowitch, A. (2005). 365 gestes pour sauver la planète. Paris: Éditions de la Martinière.Google Scholar
  6. Brulle, R. J., & Young, L. E. (2007). Advertising, individual consumption levels, and the natural environment, 1900–2000. Sociological Inquiry, 77(4), 522–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge? (pp. 196–223). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Chatriot, A., Chessel, M.-E., & Hilton, M. (Eds.). (2005). Au nom du consommateur. Consommation et politique en Europe et aux États-Unis au XXe siècle. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  9. Christensen, K. (2005). Un geste écologique par jour … pour sauver notre planète. Paris: Le Courrier Du Livre.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, N., Barnett, C., Cloke, P., & Malpass, A. (2007). Globalising the consumer: Doing politics in an ethical register. Political Geography, 26(3), 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cliath, A. G. (2007). Seeing shades. Ecological and socially just labeling. Organization & Environment, 20(4), 413–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, M. J. (2001). The emergent environmental policy discourse on sustainable consumption. In M. J. Cohen & J. Murphy (Eds.), Exploring sustainable consumption: Environmental policy and the social sciences (pp. 21–37). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, M. J. (2005). Sustainable consumption in national context: An introduction to the symposium. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 1(1), 22–28.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, M. J. (2007). Consumer credit, household financial management, and sustainable consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(1), 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Conein, B. (2004). Cognition distribuée, groupe social et technologie cognitive. Réseaux, 124, 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Croutte, P., Delpal, F., Hatchuel, G. (2006). Représentations et pratiques de la consommation engagée. Évolution 2002–2006, Cahier de recherche no. 231 du Crédoc, December.Google Scholar
  17. de Leeuw, B. (2005). The world behind the product. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(1–2), 7–10.Google Scholar
  18. de Lisle, S. (2006). La journée de l’écocitoyen. Un guide pour préserver l’environnement. Bordeaux: Sud Ouest.Google Scholar
  19. Dean, M. (1999). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Delpal, F., Hatchuel, G. (2007). La consommation engagée s’affirme comme une tendance durable. Consommation et modes de vie, no. 201, MarchGoogle Scholar
  21. Derens, E. (2001). Campagnes d’information vis-à-vis des consommateurs: Chaîne du froid. Revue Generale Du Froid, 91, 66–68.Google Scholar
  22. Dolan, P. (2002). The sustainability of “sustainable consumption”. Journal of Macromarketing, 22(2), 170–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2006). De la routine à la délibération. Les arbitrages des consommateurs en situation d’achat. Réseaux, 24(135–136), 253–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dubuisson-Quellier, S. (2010). From consumerism to the empowerment of consumers: The case of consumer oriented movements in France. Sustainability, 2(7), 1849–1868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fuchs, D. A., & Lorek, S. (2002). Sustainable consumption governance in a globalizing world. Global Environmental Politics, 2(1), 19–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fuchs, D. A., & Lorek, S. (2005). Sustainable consumption governance: A history of promises and failure. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(3), 261–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galbraith, J. K. (1967). The new industrial state. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  28. Gatersleben, B., White, E., Abrahamse, W., Jackson, T., & Uzzell, D. (2010). Values and sustainable lifestyles. Architectural Science Review, 53(1), 37–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gifford, R. (2007). Environmental psychology and sustainable development: Expansion, maturation, and challenges. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glocheux, D. (2004). Sauvez cette planète! Mode d’emploi. Pour agir: 512 gestes simples et attitudes douces. Paris: Jean-Claude Lattès.Google Scholar
  31. Goubert, J.-P. (1989). The conquest of water. The advent of health in the industrial age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Halkier, B. (1999). Consequences of the politicization of consumption: The example of environmentally friendly consumption practices. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 1(1), 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hebel, P., Fauconnier, N., David, M. (2005). La nouvelle sensibilité des consommateurs aux prix. Cahier de recherche, no. 215 du Crédoc (Centre de Recherche pour l’Etude et l’Observation des Conditions de Vie), November.Google Scholar
  34. Heiskanen, E. (2005). The performative nature of consumer research: Consumers’ environmental awareness as an example. Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(2), 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hinchliffe, S. (1996). Helping the earth begins at home. The social construction of socio-environmental responsibilities. Global Environmental Change, 6(1), 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jackson, T. (Ed.). (2006). The earthscan reader in sustainable consumption. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  37. Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth. Economics for a finite planet. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  38. Jeudy, H. -P. (1991). «Le choix public du propre. Une propriété des sociétés modernes,» Les Annales de la Recherche Urbaine, no. 53, December, 102–107.Google Scholar
  39. Johnston, J. (2008). The citizen-consumer hybrid: Ideological tensions and the case of whole foods market. Theory and Society, 37(3), 229–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Joyce, P. (2003). The rule of freedom. Liberalism and the Modern City. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  41. Laborier, P., & Lascoumes, P. (2005). L’action publique comprise comme gouvernementalisation de l’Etat. In S. Meyet, M.-C. Naves, & T. Ribemont (Eds.), Travailler avec Foucault. Retours sur le politique. Paris: L’Harmattan.Google Scholar
  42. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Laville, E., & Balmain, M. (2006). Achetons responsable!: Mieux consommer dans le respect des hommes et de la nature. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  44. Leroy, M. (2001). Guide du consommateur responsable. Paris: Marabout.Google Scholar
  45. Lodziak, C. (1995). Manipulating needs. Capitalism and culture. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  46. López Alvarez, J. V., Aguilar Larrucea, M., Soriano Santandreu, F., & Fernando de Fuentes, A. (2009). Containerisation of the selective collection of light packaging waste material: The case of small cities in advanced economies. Cities, 26(6), 339–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Luke, T. W. (1993). Green consumerism: Ecology and the ruse of recycling. In J. Bennett & W. Chaloupka (Eds.), In the nature of things. Language, politics and the environment (pp. 154–172). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  48. Malpass, A., Barnett, C., Clarke, N., & Cloke, P. (2007). Problematizing choice: Responsible consumers and sceptical citizens. In M. Bevir & F. Trentmann (Eds.), Governance, consumers and citizens. Agency and resistance in contemporary politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Maniates, M. (2001). Individualization: Plant a tree, buy a bike, save the world? Global environmental politics, 1(3). Summer, pp. 31–52. Reprinted in T. Princen, M. Maniates, K. Conca (Eds.), Confronting Consumption, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2002.Google Scholar
  50. Marcuse, H. (1964). One-dimensional man. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  51. Marcus-Steiff, J. (1977). L’information comme mode d’action des organisations de consommateurs. Revue Française de Sociologie, 18(1), 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1997). Mobilising the consumer: Assembling the subject of consumption. Theory, Culture & Society, 14(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present. Administering economic, social and personal life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  54. Moisander, J. (2007). Motivational complexity of green consumerism. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(4), 404–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Moisander, J., & Pesonen, S. (2002). Narratives of sustainable ways of living: Constructing the self and the other as a green consumer. Management Decision, 40(4), 329–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Murphy, J., & Cohen, M. J. (2001). Consumption, environment and public policy. In M. J. Cohen & J. Murphy (Eds.), Exploring sustainable consumption. Environmental policy and the social sciences (pp. 3–17). Amsterdam: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  57. OECD. (2002). Towards sustainable household consumption? Trends and policies in OECD countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  58. OECD (Environment Directorate/CERI). (1999). Education and Learning for Sustainable Consumption. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  59. Paquot, T. (2008). De la “société de consommation” et de ses détracteurs. Mouvements, 54, 54–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pinto, L. (1992). La gestion d’un label politique: la consommation. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 91–92, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Planchat, C. (2007). Protéger l’environnement: un objectif pour une grande majorité de Français. Insee Première, 1121, January.Google Scholar
  62. Reisch, L. A. (2001). The internet and sustainable consumption: Perspectives on a Janus face. Journal of Consumer Policy, 24(3–4), 251–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reisch, L. A. (2004). Sustainable consumption as a consumer policy issue. In L. A. Reisch & I. Røpke (Eds.), The ecological economics of consumption (pp. 175–189). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  64. Rey-Lefebvre, I. (2006). Une étiquette énergie pour les logements. Le Monde, October 26.Google Scholar
  65. Rizzo, R. (2006). Sauver le monde sans être Superman. Les gestes écologiques au quotidien. Paris: Belin.Google Scholar
  66. Rose, N. (2000). Community, citizenship, and the third way. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(9), 1395–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rose, N., & Miller, P. (1992). Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. The British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sanches, S. (2005). Sustainable consumption à la française? Conventional, innovative, and alternative approaches to sustainability and consumption in France. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 1(1), 43–57.Google Scholar
  69. Sanne, C. (2002). Willing consumers—or locked in? policies for a sustainable consumption. Ecological Economics, 42(1–2), 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sanne, C. (2005). The consumption of our discontent. Business Strategy and the Environment, 14(5), 315–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schaefer, A., & Crane, A. (2005). Addressing sustainability and consumption. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(1), 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schnaiberg, A., Pellow, D. N., & Weinberg, A. (2002). The treadmill of production and the environmental state. In A. Mol & F. Buttel (Eds.), The environmental state under pressure (pp. 15–32). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Scholl, G., Rubik, F., Kalimo, H., Biedenkopf, K., & Söebech, Ó. (2010). Policies to promote sustainable consumption: Innovative approaches in Europe. Natural Resources Forum, 34(1), 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sharp, L., & Richardson, T. (2001). Reflections on foucauldian discourse analysis in planning and environmental policy research. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 3(3), 193–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shove, E., & Southerton, D. (2000). Defrosting the freezer: From novelty to convenience. Journal of Material Culture, 5(3), 301–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Southerton, D., Warde, A., & Hand, M. (2005). The limited autonomy of the consumer: Implications for sustainable consumption. In D. Southerton, H. Chappells, & B. Van Vliet (Eds.), Sustainable consumption: The implications of changing infrastructures of provision. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  77. Stearns, P. N. (2006). Consumerism in world history. The global transformation of desire (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  78. Stiegler, B. (2004). De la misère symbolique. Tome 1. L’époque hyperindustrielle. Paris, Editions Galilée.Google Scholar
  79. Stolle, D., & Hooghe, M. (2003). Consumers as political participants? Shifts in political action repertoires in western societies. In M. Micheletti, A. Follesdal, & D. Stolle (Eds.), Politics, products, and markets. Exploring political consumerism past and present (pp. 265–288). New Brunswick: Transaction Press.Google Scholar
  80. Stolle, D., Hooghe, M., & Micheletti, M. (2005). Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science Review, 26(3), 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Takase, C. (2005). Changing consumption and production patterns—the Marrakech process. Natural Resources Forum, 29(4), 404–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Thouvenot, T., & Bouttier-Guérive, G. (2004). Planète attitude. Les gestes écologiques au quotidien. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  83. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Worldwatch Institute. (2004). State of the world 2004. Special focus: The consumer society. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Equipe de Recherche sur les Mutations de l’Europe et de ses Sociétés (ERMES)Université de Nice Sophia AntipolisNICE Cedex 01France

Personalised recommendations