Theory and Society

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 459–484 | Cite as

The crisis of neoliberalism and the future of international institutions: A comparison of the IMF and the WTO

Article

Abstract

The current crisis of neoliberalism is calling into question the relevance of key international institutions. We analyze the origins, nature, and possible impacts of the crisis through comparing two such institutions: the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Trade Organization (WTO). Both originated in the post-World War II U.S.-led hegemonic order and were transformed as part of the transition to global neoliberalism. We show that while the IMF and the WTO have been part of the same hegemonic project, their distinct institutional features have put them on significantly different trajectories. Historical differences in the two institutions’ systems of rules have placed the IMF in a more vulnerable position than the WTO, which provides clues to the future contours of global economic governance.

References

  1. Babb, S. (2007). Embeddedness, inflation, and international regimes: the IMF in the early postwar period. American Journal of Sociology, 113(1), 128–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babb, S., & Buira, A. (2005). Mission creep, mission push, and discretion: the case of IMF conditionality. In A. Buira (Ed.), The IMF and the World Bank at Sixty (pp. 59–84). London, UK: Anthem.Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin, D. (ed). (1993). Neorealism and Neoliberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barro, R. J., & Lee J.-W. (2002). IMF Programs: Who is Chosen and what are the Effects? National Bureau of Economic Research 8951.Google Scholar
  5. Bello, W., & Guttal, S. (2005). Crisis of credibility: the declining power of the international monetary fund. Multinational Monitor, 26(7), 8–19.Google Scholar
  6. Block, F. L. (1977). The origins of international economic disorder: A study of United States international monetary policy from world war II to the present. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Blustein, P. (2001). The chastening: Inside the crisis that rocked the global financial system and humbled the IMF. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  8. Bown, C. P., & Hoekman, B. M. (2005). WTO dispute settlement and the missing developing country cases: Engaging the private sector. Journal of International Economic Law, 8, 861–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Buira, A. (2005). The Bretton Woods Institutions: Governance without legitimacy? In A. Buira (Ed.), Reforming the Governance of the IMF and the World Bank (pp. 7–44). London, UK: Anthem.Google Scholar
  11. Burawoy, M. (2003). For a sociological Marxism: the complementary convergence of Antonio Gramsci and Karl Polanyi. Politics and Society, 31(2), 193–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Busch, M., & Reinhard, E. (2002). Testing international trade law: Empirical studies of GATT/WTO dispute settlement. In D. M. Kennedy & J. D. Southwick (Eds.), The political economy of international trade law: Essays in honor of Robert Hudec (pp. 457–481). New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Carin, B., Higgott, R., Scholte, J. A., Smith, G., & Stone, D. (2006). Global Governance: Looking Ahead, 2006–2010. Global Governance, 12, 1–6.Google Scholar
  14. Centeno, M. A. (1994). Democracy within reason: Technocratic revolution in Mexico. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Chorev, N. (2005). The institutional project of neo-liberal globalism: the case of the WTO. Theory and Society, 34, 317–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chorev, N. (2007a). Remaking U.S. trade policy: From protectionism to globalization. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Chorev, N. (2007b). Political and institutional maneuvers in international trade negotiations: The United States and the Doha development round. In W. Blaas & J. Becker (Eds.), Strategic arena switching in international trade negotiations (pp. 33–65). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  18. Chorev, N. (2008). The judicial transformation of the state: the case of U.S. trade policy, 1974–2004. Law and Policy, 30(4), 1–38.Google Scholar
  19. Cline, W. R. (1995). International debt reexamined. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  20. Cohn, T. H. (2002). Governing global trade: International institutions in conflict and convergence. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  21. Collier, P. (1997). The failure of conditionality. In C. Gwin & J. M. Nelson (Eds.), Perspectives on aid and development. Washington D.C: Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
  22. Corra, M., & Willer, D. (2002). The gatekeeper. Sociological Theory, 20(2), 180–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cox, R. W. 1986 (1981). Social forces, states, and world order: beyond international relations theory. In Approaches to World Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 85–123.Google Scholar
  24. Cox, R. W. (1987). Production, power, and world order: Social forces in the making of history. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Curzon, G., & Curzon, V. (1973). Hidden barriers to international trade. London: Trade Policy Research Centre.Google Scholar
  26. De Vries, M. (1987). Balance of payments adjustment, 1945 to 1986: The IMF experience. Washington, D.C.: The International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  27. Dell, S. (1981). On being grandmotherly: The evolution of IMF conditionality. Essays in international finance. No. 144. Princeton, N.J: Princeton.Google Scholar
  28. Dell, S. (1988). The question of cross-conditionality. World Development, 16(5), 557–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Diebold, W., Jr. (1952). The End of the I.T.O. Essays in International Finance, no. 16. Princeton University.Google Scholar
  30. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dreher, A. (2002). The development and implementation of IMF and world bank conditionality. HWWA Discussion Paper. Google Scholar
  32. Duncan, G. (2009). Bargaining fails to break deadlock, with America and Europe divided over the IMF. The Times of London, 4/27/2009.Google Scholar
  33. Dunkley, G. (2000). The free trade adventure. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  34. Easterly, W. R. (2001). The elusive quest for growth: Economists’ adventures and misadventures in the tropics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT.Google Scholar
  35. Easterly, W. R. (2006). The White Man’s burden: Why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  36. Elliott, L. (2008). Tariffs: WTO talks collapse after India And China clash with America over farm products. The Guardian, 7/30/2008, p. 22.Google Scholar
  37. Evans, P. B., Jacobson, H. K., & Putnam, R. D. (eds). (1993). Double-Edged diplomacy: International bargaining and domestic politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Faiola, A., & Lakshmi, R. (2008). Trade talks crumble in feud over farm aid. Washington Post, 7/30/2008, p. A01.Google Scholar
  39. Finlayson, J., & Zacher, M. (1981). The GATT and the regulation of trade barriers: regime dynamics and functions. International Organization, 35(4), 561–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gale, F. (1998). Cave ‘cave! hic dragones’: a neo-gramscian deconstruction and reconstruction of international regime theory. Review of International Political Economy, 5(2), 252–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gardner, R. N. (1980). Sterling-dollar diplomacy in current perspective. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Gereffi, G., Garcia-Johnson R., & Sasser, E. (2001). The NGO-Industrial Complex. Foreign Policy: 56–65.Google Scholar
  43. Gill, S. (2003). Power and resistance in the new world order. New York: Palgrae Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. London: Lawrence and Wishart.Google Scholar
  45. Gowan, P. (1999). The global gamble: Washington’s Faustian bid for world dominance. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  46. Gwin, C., & Nelson, J. M. (1997). Development and aid: New evidence and new issues. In C. Gwin & J. M. Nelson (Eds.), Perspectives on aid and development (pp. 1–17). Washington D.C: Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
  47. Hall, P. A., & Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Political Studies, 44, 936–957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Henisz, W., Zelner, B. A., & Guillén, M. F. (2005). The worldwide diffusion of market-oriented infrastructure reform, 1977–1999. American Sociological Review, 70(6), 871–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Horsefield, J. K., & De Vries, M. G. (1969). The international monetary fund, 1945–1965: Twenty years of international monetary cooperation. Washington: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  52. Hudec, R. E. (1990). The GATT legal system and world trade diplomacy. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  53. Hudec, R. E. (1993). Enforcing international trade law: The evolution of the modern GATT legal system. New Hampshire: Butterworth.Google Scholar
  54. Hudec, R. E. (1999). The new WTO dispute settlement procedure: an overview of the first three years. Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, 8, 1–53.Google Scholar
  55. Ingram, P., Robinson, J., & Busch, M. L. (2005). The intergovernmental network of world trade: IGO connectedness, governance, and embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 111(3), 824–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. International Monetary Fund (IMF) (various years). Annual Reports. Washington, D.C.: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  57. James, H. (2001). The end of globalization: Lessons from the great depression. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Jawara, F., & Kwa, A. (2003). Behind the scenes at the WTO. London: Zed.Google Scholar
  59. Kapur, D. (2005). Conditionality and its alternatives. In A. Buira (Ed.), The IMF and the world bank at sixty (pp. 31–57). London, UK: Anthem.Google Scholar
  60. Kapur, D, & Webb, R. (2000). Governance-related conditionalities of the international financial institutions. G-24 Discussion Paper 6 July 19, 2006.Google Scholar
  61. Kapur, D., Lewis, J. P., & Webb, R. (1997). The world bank: Its first half century. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  62. Kaufmann, D. (2004). Governance Redux: The Empirical Challenge. World Bank Institute.Google Scholar
  63. Lerrick, A. (2007). What’s Left for the IMF? Wall Street Journal, 4/13/2007, A13.Google Scholar
  64. Maggi, G. (1999). The role of multilateral institutions in international trade cooperation. American Economic Review, 89(1), 190–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. McGillivray, F. (2000). Democratizing the world trade organization. Hoover Institute.Google Scholar
  66. Mikesell, R. F. (1994). The Bretton Woods debates: A memoir. Princeton, N.J.: International Finance Section, Dept. of Economics, Princeton University.Google Scholar
  67. Morton, A. D. (2003). Social forces in the struggle over hegemony: neo-gramscian perspectives in international political economy. Rethinking Marxism, 15(2), 153–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Mosley, L. (2002). Global capital and national governments. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Muchhala, B. (2009). The IMF’s financial crisis loans: No change in conditionalities. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network. http://www.ifiwatchnet.org/sites/ifiwatchnet.org/files/IMFCrisisLoansOverviewTWNMarch2009.pdf (accessed 5/1/09).
  70. Nooruddin, I., & Simmons, J. W. (2006). The politics of hard choices: IMF programs and government spending. International Organization, 60, 1001–1033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Painter, A. (2009). The Washington Consensus is Dead. The Guardian, 4/10/2009.Google Scholar
  73. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1977). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  74. Pierson, P., & Skocpol, T. (2002). Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. In I. Katznelson & H. V. Milner (Eds.), Political science: The state of the discipline (pp. 693–721). New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  75. Pigman, G. A. (1997). Hegemony and trade liberalization policy: Britain and the Brussels sugar convention of 1902. Review of International Studies, 23, 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Polak, J. (1991). The changing nature of IMF conditionality. Princeton, NJ: International Finance Section, Department of Economics, Princeton University. Essays in International Finance.Google Scholar
  77. Polak, J. (1996). The world bank and the IMF: A changing relationship. In D. Kapur, J.P. Lewis, & R. Webb (Eds.) 1997, The World Bank: Its First Half Century, Volume II (pp. 473–523), Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  78. Polillo, S., & Guillén, M. F. (2005). Globalization pressures and the state: the worldwide spread of central bank independence. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1764–1802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Preeg, E. H. (1995). Traders in a brave new world: The Uruguay round and the future of the international trading system. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  80. Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Robinson, W. I. (2005). Gramsci and globalisation: from national-state to transnational hegemony. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 8(4), 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Rodrik, D. (2006). Goodbye Washington consensus, hello Washington confusion? Journal of Economic Literature, XLIV, 973–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Rosenthal, P. C., & Vermylen, R. T. C. (2000). The WTO antidumping and subsidies agreements: did the United States achieve its objectives during the Uruguay round? Law and Policy in International Business, 31, 871.Google Scholar
  84. Ruggie, J. G. (1982). International regimes, transactions and change: embedded liberalism in the post–war economic order. International Organization, 36, 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Secchi, C. (1997). The political economy of the Uruguay round: Groups, strategies, interests and results. In R. Faini & E. Grilli (Eds.), Multilateralism and regionalism after the Uruguay round (pp. 61–111). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  86. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study of politics and organization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  87. Shaw, M. (2000). Theory of the global state: Globality as an unfinished revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  88. Smith, J. (2004). Inequality in international trade? Developing countries and institutional change in WTO dispute settlement. Review of International Political Economy, 11, 542–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Steinberg, R. H. (2002). In the shadow of law or power? Consensus-based bargaining and outcomes in the GATT/WTO. International Organization, 56, 339–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). The insider: what i learned at the world economic crisis. The New Republic, April 17–24: 56–60.Google Scholar
  91. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  92. Stiglitz, J. E. (2006). Making globalization work. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  93. Thelen, K. (1999). Historical insitutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 369–494.Google Scholar
  94. Thelen, K. (2004). How institutions evolve: The political economy of skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  95. Thelen, K., & Steinmo, S. (1992). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis (pp. 1–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  96. United States Congress, House. (1986). Foreign operations, export financing, and related programs appropriations for 1987: Hearings before a subcommittee of the committee on appropriations. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  97. United States Congress, House. (1998). Foreign operations, export financing, and related programs appropriations for 1999: Hearings before a subcommittee of the committee on appropriations. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  98. Useem, M. (1993). Executive defense: Shareholder power and corporate reorganization. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Vreeland, J. R. (2003). The IMF and economic development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Wallach, L., Sforza, M., & Nader, R. (2004). Whose trade organization? A comprehensive guide to the world trade organization. New York: New.Google Scholar
  101. Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modernworld-system I: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic.Google Scholar
  102. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  103. Weber, M. (1978 [1922]). Economy and Society, translated and edited by G. Roth & C. Wittich. New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
  104. Webb, M. C., & Krasner, S. D. (1989). Hegemonic stability theory: an empirical assessment. Review of International Studies, 15, 183–198.Google Scholar
  105. Weir, M. (1992). Politics and jobs: The boundaries of employment policy in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  106. Weisbrot, M., Cordero, J., & Sandoval, L. (2009). Empowering the IMF: Should reform be a requirement for increasing the fund’s resources. Washington, D.C.: Center for Economic and Policy Research. http://www.cepr.net/index.php/publications/reports/empowering-the-imf:-should-reform-be-a-requirement-for-increasing-the-funds-resources/ (accessed 5/1/09).
  107. Wilkinson, R. (2000). Multilateralism and the world trade organization: The architecture and extension of international trade regulation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  108. Winham, G. R. (1986). International trade and the Tokyo round negotiation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Woods, N. (2005). Making the IMF and the world bank more accountable. In A. Buira (Ed.), Reforming the governance of the IMF and the world bank (pp. 149–171). London, UK: Anthem.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyBoston CollegeChestnut HillUSA

Personalised recommendations