Advertisement

Theory and Society

, Volume 38, Issue 6, pp 613–648 | Cite as

The power of the intelligentsia: The Rywin Affair and the challenge of applying the concept of cultural capital to analyze Poland’s elites

  • Tomasz Zarycki
Article

Abstract

This article aims at integrating the phenomenon of the Central and Eastern European intelligentsia into the application of the theory of cultural capital of Pierre Bourdieu to the analysis of societies of that region. This is done by critically reevaluating the model of evolution of the post-communist countries of Central Europe proposed by Gil Eyal, Ivan Szelényi, and Eleanor Townsley, in their “Making Capitalism without Capitalists.” The present article argues for supplementing their approach with an analytical distinction between the concepts of intellectuals (as masters of the critical discourse culture) and the intelligentsia, which in countries like Poland have an important component of post-gentry culture. The identity and images of the intelligentsia are analyzed as important though highly contested aspects of cultural capital in Poland. Wide implications of discursive battles on the status of intelligentsia in contemporary Poland are exemplified in the case of the debates over the so-called Rywin Affair in Poland and the role played in that affair by the major Polish intellectual Adam Michnik. The political discourse related to the affair and to the status of Michnik are studied in context of the structure of the Polish political scene and related to the academic debates on the intelligentsia, whether it is a “really existing” and significant social group or merely a marginal one and “outdated discourse.”

Keywords

Social Capital Cultural Capital Communist Party Political Capital Freedom Fighter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

An earlier version of this article was presented at the Conference of the British Association for Slavonic and East European Studies (BASEES), Cambridge, U.K., 2–4 April 2005. The author would like to thank readers of earlier versions of this article and the Editors of Theory & Society, in particular David Swartz, as well as anonymous reviewers for their numerous comments and suggestions. The author of course takes all the responsibility for the theses and shortcomings of the article.

References

  1. Bil, M., Małkiewicz, A., & Błoński, A. (2005). Komisja Rywina. Próba spojrzenia politologicznego. Wrocław: Oficyna Wydawnicza Atut.Google Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1996). The rules of art. Genesis and structure of the literary field. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  3. Chalaby, J. K. (1996). Beyond the prison-house of language: Discourse as a sociological concept. The British Journal of Sociology, 47(4), 684–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chałasiński, J. (1946). Społeczna genealogia inteligencji polskiej. Warszawa: Czytelnik.Google Scholar
  5. Chałasiński, J. (1998). Serce prostego człowieka. Chłopi i panowie. Kultura Wsi. Wiejskie źródła kultury w polskim procesie narodowotwórczym, III(1/4).Google Scholar
  6. Cywiński, B. (1970). Rodowody niepokornych. Kraków: Społeczny Instytut Wydawniczy Znak.Google Scholar
  7. Domański, H. (2000). On the verge of convergence. Social stratification in Eastern Europe. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Eyal, G. (2003). The origins of postcommunist elites. From Prague Spring to the breakup of Czechoslovakia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  9. Eyal, G., Szelényi, I., & Townsley, E. R. (1998). Making capitalism without capitalists. Class formation and elite struggles in post-communist Central Europe. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  10. Flam, H. (1999). Dissenting intellectuals and plain dissenters: The cases of Poland and East Germany. In A. Bozóki (Ed.), Intellectuals and politics in Central Europe (pp. 19–42). Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Gella, A. (1976). An introduction to the sociology of the intelligentsia. In A. Gella (Ed.), The intelligentsia and the intellectuals. Theory, method, and case study (pp. 9–34). London, Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  12. Gella, A. (2001). Inteligencja polska i siodło po niej. Arcana, 37(1), 20–38.Google Scholar
  13. Gouldner, A. W. (1979). The future of intellectuals and the rise of the new class. A frame of reference, theses, conjectures, arguments, and an historical perspective on the role of intellectuals and intelligentsia in the international class contest of the modern era . New York: Seabury.Google Scholar
  14. Green, P. S. (2003). Polish tale of bribery and/or politics and/or journalism. New York Times, February 12, 2003.Google Scholar
  15. Hertz, A. (1951). The case of Eastern European intelligentsia. Journal of Central European Affairs, 11(1), 10–26.Google Scholar
  16. Jałoszewski, M. (2003). Robert Kwiatkowski pozwał do sądu Kazimierza Kutza. Gazeta Wyborcza, November 16, 2003.Google Scholar
  17. Jedlicki, J. (2006). Przedwczesny pogrzeb inteligencji. Gazeta Wyborcza, January 28–29, 2006.Google Scholar
  18. Kennedy, M. D. (2001). Postcommunist capitalism, culture, and history. American Journal of Sociology, 106(4), 1138–1151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kolankiewicz, G. (1996). Social capital and social change. The British Journal of Sociology, 47(3), 427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Konrád, G., & Szelényi, I. (1979). The intellectuals on the road to class power (1st ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  21. Körösényi, A. (1999). Intellectuals and democracy: The political thinking of intellectuals. In A. Bozóki (Ed.), Intellectuals and politics in Central Europe (pp. 227–244). Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kot, W. (2007). Na stronie—Wzdęcie godnościowe. Wprost, 21.Google Scholar
  23. Krasnodębski, Z. (2004). Democracy at the periphery. Sarmatian Review, XXIV(2).Google Scholar
  24. Kubik, J. (1994). The power of symbols against the symbols of power. The rise of Solidarity and the fall of state socialism in Poland. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Kwiatkowski, R. (2005). Jaka piękna katastrofa. Wojna o ustawę medialną a afera Rywina. Warszawa: Kwiatkowski.Google Scholar
  26. Lomax, B. (1999). The inegalitarian nature of Hungary’s intellectual political culture. In A. Bozóki (Ed.), Intellectuals and Politics in Central Europe (pp. 167–184). Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Marody, M. (1999). Od społeczeństwa drugiego obiegu do społeczeństwa obywatelskiego. Studia Socjologiczne, 4(155), 35–54.Google Scholar
  28. Matynia, E. (1988). A Michnik reader. Sociological Forum, 3(2), 484–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Michnik, A. (1985). Z dziejów honoru w Polsce. Wypisy więzienne. Paryż: Instytut Literacki.Google Scholar
  30. Michnik, A. (1993). The church and the left. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Michnik, A. (2004). Polska na zakręcie. Gazeta na zakręcie. Gazeta Wyborcza, May 8, 2004.Google Scholar
  32. Milewicz, E. (2007). Gąszcz win cara Michnika. Gazeta Wyborcza, January 9, 2007.Google Scholar
  33. Morson, G. S. (1993). What Is the intelligentsia? Once More, an Old Russian Question. Academic Questions, 6/3, 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nowak, A. (2007). Większość inteligentów to komformiści. Fakt, March 4, 2007.Google Scholar
  35. Ost, D. (1990). Solidarity and the politics of anti-politics. Opposition and reform in Poland since 1968. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Podgórecki, A. (1994). Polish society. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  37. Reader, K. (1987). Intellectuals and the Left in France since 1968. New York: St. Martin.Google Scholar
  38. Rokita, J. (2004). Alfabet Rokity. Rozmawiali Michał Karnowski i Piotr Zaremba. Kraków: Wydawnictwo “M”.Google Scholar
  39. Rymanowski, B., & Siennicki, P. (2004). Towarzystwo Lwa Rywina (Ith ed.). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Literackie.Google Scholar
  40. Sierakowski, S. (2003). Devide et impera. Rzeczpospolita, April 2, 2003.Google Scholar
  41. Sierakowski, S. (2004). Polska do Nietschego? Krytyka Polityczna, 6.Google Scholar
  42. Siisiäinen, M. (2000). Two concepts of social capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam, ISTR fourth international conference “The third sector: For what and for whom?” Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.Google Scholar
  43. Skarga, B. (2006). Inteligencja zamilkła. Gazeta Wyborcza, Janurary 14–15, 2006.Google Scholar
  44. Skórzyński, J. (ed). (2003). System Rywina, czyli, druga strona III Rzeczypospolitej. Warszawa: Świat Książki.Google Scholar
  45. Smolar, A. (2003). Winny, ofiara i naprawa Rzeczypospolitej. Rzeczpospolita, February 7, 2003.Google Scholar
  46. Solzhenitsyn, A. I. (1974). Obrazovanshchina. In Iz-pod glyb. Paris: YMCA.Google Scholar
  47. Staniłko, J. F. (2007). Niepokorni milusińscy. O wielkości i nędzy inteligencji polskiej. Arcana, 77(5), 53–67.Google Scholar
  48. Staniszkis, J., Mac, J. S., & Kutz, K. (2004). To nie to, nie tak miało być. Dialogi. Jadwiga Staniszkis, Kazimierz Kutz w rozmowie z Jerzym S. Macem. Warszawa: Ego.Google Scholar
  49. Szelényi, I. (1982). The intelligentsia in the class structure of state-socialist societies. American Journal of Sociology, 88, S287–S326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Śpiewak, P. (2003). Koniec złudzeń. Rzeczpospolita, January 23, 2003.Google Scholar
  51. Thompson, E. (2007). Narodowość i polityka. Polska świadomość narodowa jako problem. Europa, June 2, 2007.Google Scholar
  52. Tighe, C. (1998). Cultural pathology: roots of Polish literary opposition to communism. Journal of European Studies, 28(3), 267–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Walicki, A. (2005). Polish conception of the intelligentsia and its calling. In F. Bjorling & A. Pereswetoff-Morath (Eds.), Words, deeds and values. The intelligentsias in Russia and Poland during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries (pp. 1–22). Lund: Department of East and Central European Studies. Lund University.Google Scholar
  54. Wedel, J. R. (1986). The private Poland. New York, NY: Facts on File Inc.Google Scholar
  55. Wielkopolska, A. (1993). Cena sentymentu. Rzeczpospolita, September 11–12, 1993.Google Scholar
  56. Zarycki, T. (2003). Cultural capital and the political role of the intelligentsia in Poland. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 19(4), 91–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ziemkiewicz, R. (2004). Polactwo. Lublin: Fabryka Słów.Google Scholar
  58. Ziemkiewicz, R. (2006). Michnikowszczyzna. Zapis choroby. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo “Red Horse”.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Social StudiesUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations