Time orientations and emotion-rules in finance
- 260 Downloads
This article explores how Anglo-American financial firms since the 1980s have operated and acted in an increasingly deregulated, risky, and uncertain arena. I look at these firms and their actions with a particular focus on “temporality” and requisite “emotion-rules,” where variations in emotion-rules correspond with organizational definitions of uncertainty. Firms impose specific emotion-rules, depending on national policies, official duties, and interpretations of each risk. In finance, caveat emptor (i.e., buyer or lender distrust) is an emotion-rule set in screening policies and data collection for credit risks and risks of fraud by personnel, and it gives rise to actual emotions. I argue that three time-orientations are significant in creating emotion-rules. If a past, present, or a long-term future is deployed to construct a future, that creates and frames an institution’s attempts to manage uncertainty. Looking exclusively at Anglo-American corporate finance policies and strategies (often deemed the international “one best way”), six modes of certainty constructions are presented. Each is assessed against the dispositions and emotional strategies required in highly-skilled careers, in specific organizational settings. The relative influence of individual perspectives, institutional rules and general typologies of social action is assessed and found to comprise one past view, three present views, and one future-oriented perspective towards the future. Implications are outlined for emotion-rules relevant to financial careers and office.
KeywordsCentral Bank Mutual Fund Time Orientation Hedge Fund Financial Firm
Thanks to Craig Browne, Norbert Ebert, Michael Pusey, Denise Thompson, and Jens Zinn, to referees for anonymous comments, and to my FRG Research Grant (UNSW 2007).
- Berezin, M. (2003). Emotions and the economy. CSES working paper series 12. Center for the study of economy and society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
- Bittman, M., & Pixley, J. (1997). The double Life of the Family. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
- Bogle, J. (2003). Statement before the US House of Representatives Sub-Committee of the Committee on Financial Services. 12 March 2003.Google Scholar
- du Gay, P., & Pryke, M. (eds). (2002). Cultural economy. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Flam, H. (2002). Corporate emotions. In Emotions and sociology, sociological review monograph. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Fligstein, N. (2001). The Architecture of markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Frisby, D. (1992). The alienated mind. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Jackall, R. (1988). Moral mazes: The world of corporate manager. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kindleberger, C. P. (1989). Manias, panics and crashes: A history of financial crises (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Mannheim, K. (1936). Ideology and Utopia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Mannheim, K. (1940). Man and society in an age of reconstruction. New York: Harcourt, Brace.Google Scholar
- Marshall, K. (2005). Only the bright and bold need apply. Australia Financial Review July 11, 2005: 31Google Scholar
- Pixley, J. F. (1993). Citizenship & employment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pixley, J. F. (2004). Emotions in finance: Distrust and uncertainty in global markets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Pixley, J. F. (2005). Central Bank syndrome. Australian Financial Review, 3, 9–10.Google Scholar
- Rajan, R. G. (2005). Has financial development made the World riskier? Director of research, international monetary fund, article on www.kc.frb.org/PUBLICAT/SYMPOS/2005 downloaded June 11, 2007.
- Williamson, O. E. (1991). The logic of economic organization. In O. E. Williamson & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The nature of the firm. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar