Theory and Society

, 38:57 | Cite as

Theorizing business power in the semiperiphery: Mexico 1970-2000

Article

Abstract

This study explains why the power of neoliberal business over the Mexican state increased during the last three decades of the twentieth century. It identifies three sources of increased neoliberal business power that occurred in conjunction with neoliberal reforms: (1) active mobilization by neoliberal business, (2) increased access to the state by neoliberal business, and (3) increased economic power of neoliberal business. It thereby contributes additional evidence that counters the view of Mexico’s state neoliberalizers as acting autonomously from business. It further outlines two conditions that were instrumental in bringing about the increased power of neoliberal business: the onset of economic crisis in the 1970s, and a shift in foreign capital preferences in Mexico. The analysis demonstrates how Mexico’s sources and conditions of business power differed from those in advanced industrial societies, and outlines why the Mexican case may be a good starting point for devising a historically-contingent theory of business power in the semiperiphery.

References

  1. Abraham, D. (1981). The collapse of the Weimar republic: Political economy and crisis. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abraham, D. (1984a). Abraham, David the ‘collapse of the Weimar republic’—a reply to Feldman, Gerald. Central European History, 17, 178–244.Google Scholar
  3. Abraham, D. (1984b). Abraham, David the ‘collapse of the Weimar republic’—on Feldman insistence—some closing remarks. Central European History, 17, 268–290.Google Scholar
  4. Aguila, E. S., & Rivera Rios, M. A. (1994). Pequeña empresa y modernización: Análysis de dos dimensiones. Mexico City: UNAM.Google Scholar
  5. Akard, P. (1992). Corporate mobilization and political power: the transformation of U S Economic Policy in the 1970s. American Sociological Review, 57, 597–615.Google Scholar
  6. Alba Vega, C. (1998). Tres regiones de México ante la globalización: Los casos de Chihuahua, Nuevo León y Jalisco. In C. Alba Vega, I. Bizberg, & H. Riviere (Eds.), Las regiones ante la globalización (pp. 189–208). Mexico City: Colegio de México.Google Scholar
  7. Arrighi, G. (1985). Semiperipheral development: The politics of southern Europe in the twentieth century. Beverly Hills, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Arrighi, G. (1990). The developmentalist illusion: A reconceptualization of the semiperiphery. In W. G. Martin (Ed.), Semiperipheral states in the world-economy (pp. 11–41). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  9. Arrighi, G. (2005). Globalization in world-systems perspective. In R. Appelbaum, & W. I. Robinson (Eds.), Critical globalization studies (pp. 33–44). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Arrighi, G., & Drangel, J. (1986). The stratification of the world-economy: an exploration of the semiperipheral zone. Review, 10, 9–74.Google Scholar
  11. Aspe, P. (1993). El camino Mexicano de la transformación económica. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ayala Espino, J. (1988). Estado y desarrollo: la formación de la economía mixta Mexicana (1920–1982). Mexico City, Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Ecónomica, Secretaría de Energia Minas e Industria Paraestatal, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de México.Google Scholar
  13. Babb, S. (2002). Managing Mexico. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bailey, J. (1980). Presidency, bureaucracy, and administrative reform in Mexico: the secretariate of programming and budget. Inter-American Economic Affairs, 34, 27–59.Google Scholar
  15. Bailey, J. (1986). The impact of major groups on policy-making trends in government-business relations in Mexico. In R. Camp (Ed.), Mexico’s political stability (pp. 119–142). Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  16. Bellin, E. (2000). Contingent democrats: industrialists, labor and democratization in late-developing countries. World Development, 52, 175–205.Google Scholar
  17. Bernstein, B. J. (1968). The conservative achievements of liberal reform. In B. J. Bernstein (Ed.), Towards a new past; Dissenting essays in American history (pp. 263–288). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  18. Block, F. (1977). The ruling class does not rule: notes on the marxist theory of the state. Socialist Register, 7, 6–22.Google Scholar
  19. Bruhn, K. (1996). Social spending and political support: the lessons of the national solidarity program in Mexico. Comparative Politics, 28, 151–177.Google Scholar
  20. Brustein, W. (1996). The logic of evil: The social origins of the Nazi party (pp. 1925–1933). New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Cameron, M., & Tomlin, B. (2000). The making of NAFTA: How the deal was done. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Camou, A. (1997). Los consejeros del príncipe: saber técnico y política en los procesos de reforma económica en América Latina. Nueva Sociedad, 152, 54–67.Google Scholar
  23. Camp, R. (1985). The political technocrat in Mexico and the survival of the political system. Latin American Research Review, 20, 97–118.Google Scholar
  24. Camp, R. A. (1989). Entrepreneurs and politics in twentieth-century Mexico. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Canak, W. L. (1989). Lost promises: Debt austerity, and development in Latin America. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  26. Cárdenas, E. (1996). La política económica en México (pp. 1950–1994). Mexico City: Fondo de la Cultura Económica/El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
  27. Cardero, M. E., & Quijano, J. M. (1983). Expansión y estrangulamiento financiero: 1978–1981. In J. M. Quijano (Ed.), La banca: Pasado y presente (Problemas Financieros Mexicanos) (pp. 221–304). Mexico City: CIDE.Google Scholar
  28. Castells, M., & Laserna, R. (1994). The new dependency: Technological change and socioeconomic restructuring in Latin America. In D. Kincaid, & A. Portes (Eds.), Comparative national development: Society and economy in the new global order (pp. 57–83). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  29. CCE (1975). Ideario del Consejo Coordinador Empresarial. Mexico City: CMHN, ABM, COPARMEZ, CCE, CONCAMIN.Google Scholar
  30. Centeno, M. A. (1995). Democracy within reason: Technocratic revolution in Mexico. University Park, Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Centeno, M. A., & Maxfield, S. (1992). The marriage of finance and order: changes in the Mexican political elite. Journal of Latin American Studies, 24, 57–85.Google Scholar
  32. Centeno, M. A., & Silva, P. (1998). The politics of expertise in Latin America. London: MacMillian.Google Scholar
  33. Chand, V. (2001). Mexico’s political awakening. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  34. Chase-Dunn, C. (1989). Global formation. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Chase-Dunn, C. (1990). Resistance to imperialism: semiperipheral actors. Review, 13, 1–31.Google Scholar
  36. Cockcroft, J. D. (1983). Mexico: Class formation, capital accumulation, and the state. New York: Monthly Review.Google Scholar
  37. Conaghan, C., & Malloy, J. (1994). Unsettling statecraft: Democracy and neoliberalism in the central Andes. Pittsburgh and London: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  38. Cornelius, W. (1996). Mexican politics in transition: The breakdown of a one-party-dominant regime. San Diego: University of California, San Diego.Google Scholar
  39. Davis, D. (1993). The dialectic of autonomy: state, class and economic crisis in Mexico, 1958–1982. Latin American Perspectives, 20, 46–75.Google Scholar
  40. de los Angeles Pozas, M. (1993). Industrial restructuring in Mexico: Corporate adaptation, technological innovation, and changing patterns of industrial relations in Monterrey. San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, UCSD.Google Scholar
  41. Domhoff, G. W. (1972). Fat cats and democrats; The role of the big rich in the party of the common man. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Domhoff, G. W. (1996). State autonomy or class dominance?: Case studies on policy making in America. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  43. Domhoff, W. (1990). The power elite and the state. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  44. Domínguez, J. I. (1997). Technopols: freeing politics and markets in Latin America in the 1990s. University Park, Pennsylvania: Penn. State University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Domínguez, J., & McCann, J. (1996). Democratizing Mexico: Public opinion and electoral choices. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Dresser, D. (1991). Neopopulist solutions to neoliberal problems: Mexico’s national solidarity program. San Diego: University of California, San Diego, Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies.Google Scholar
  47. Edwards, S. (1995). Crisis and reform in Latin America: From despair to hope. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Eggerstedt, H., & Brideau, R. (1995). Measuring capital flight: a case study of Mexico. World Development, 23, 211–232.Google Scholar
  49. Escobar, S., Arce, F. P., & San Juan, C. (1978). Mexico 1978: devaluación y crisis. Nexos, 4, 15.Google Scholar
  50. Evans, P. (1979). Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Evans, P. (1995). Embeded autonomy: States and industrial transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Evans, P. B., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Fairbrother, M. (2007). Making neoliberalism possible: the state’s organization of business support for NAFTA in Mexico. Politics & Society, 35, 265–300.Google Scholar
  54. Feldman, G. D. (1984). Abraham, David the ‘collapse of the Weimar republic’—a collapse in Weimar scholarship. Central European History, 17, 159–177.Google Scholar
  55. Firebaugh, G., & Bullock, B. P. (1986). Level of processing of exports: new estimates for 73 less-developed countries in 1970 and 1980. International Studies Quarterly, 30, 333–350.Google Scholar
  56. Fischer, F. (1990). Technocracy and the politics of expertise. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Flint, C. (2001). A timespace for electoral geography: economic restructuring, political agency and the rise of the Nazi party. Political Geography, 20, 301–329.Google Scholar
  58. Frank, A. G. (1977). Long live transideological enterprise! the socialist economies in the capitalist international division of labor. Review, 1, 91–140.Google Scholar
  59. Frieden, J. (1991). Debt, development and democracy: Modern political economy and Latin America, 1965–1985. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Galjart, B., & Silva, P. (Eds.) (1995). Designers of development: Intellectuals and technocrats in the Third World. Leiden: Research School C.N.W.S.Google Scholar
  61. Garrido Noguera, C. (1993). Los grupos privados nacionales en México. Reporte de investigación 156, serie II. Mexico City: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Azcapotzalco.Google Scholar
  62. Garrido Noguera, C., & Lopez, E. Q. (1989). Relaciones financieras, grupos economicos y disputa de poder. In R. Pozas, & M. Luna (Eds.), Las empresas y los empresarios en el México contemporáneo (pp. 107–122). Mexico City: Editorial Grijalba.Google Scholar
  63. Gaspar, G., & Valdés, L. (1987). Las desventuras recientes del bloque en el poder. Estudios Sociológicos, 5, 499–524.Google Scholar
  64. Gates, R. A. (1970). The economic policies of the German free trade unions and the German Social Democratic Party, 1930–1933. Unpublished Ph.D., University of Oregon.Google Scholar
  65. Gereffi, G., & Evans, P. (1981). Transnational corporations, dependent development, and state policy in the semiperiphery. Latin American Research Review, 16, 31–64.Google Scholar
  66. Gibson, E. (1997). The populist road to market reform policy and electoral coalitions in Mexico and Argentina. World Politics, 49, 339–370.Google Scholar
  67. Glasberg, D. S., & Skidmore, D. (1997). The dialectics of state economic intervention: bank deregulation and the savings and loan bailout. Sociological Quarterly, 38, 67–93.Google Scholar
  68. Gotham, K. F., & Staples, W. G. (1996). Narrative analysis and the new historical sociology. Sociological Quarterly, 37, 481–501.Google Scholar
  69. Haggard, S. (1995). Developing nations and the politics of global integration. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.Google Scholar
  70. Haggard, S., & Kaufman, R. (1992). Institutions and economic adjustment. In S. Haggard, & R. Kaufman (Eds.), The politics of economic adjustment (pp. 3–37). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Haggard, S., & Maxfield, S. (1996). The political economy of financial internationalization in the developing world. International Organization, 50, 35–68.Google Scholar
  72. Hamilton, N. (1982). The limits of state autonomy: Post-revolutionary Mexico. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Hernández Rodríguez, R. (1986). La política y los empresarios después de la nacionalización bancaria. Foro Internacional, 27, 247–265.Google Scholar
  74. Hernández Rodríguez, R. (1988). Empresas y empresarios en el sexenio de Miguel de la Madrid. In C. Garrido (Ed.), Empresarios y estado en America Latina (pp. 71–95). Mexico City: CIDE, Fundacion Friedrich Ebert, UAM.Google Scholar
  75. Hernández Rodríguez, R. (1991). Los problemas de representación en los organismos empresariales. Foro Internacional, 31, 736–764.Google Scholar
  76. Hooks, G. (1993). The weakness of strong theories—the United States dominance of the World-War-II investment process. American Sociological Review, 58, 37–53.Google Scholar
  77. Hoshino, T. (1989). La expansión de los grupos industriales bajo el auge petrolero y el ajuste ante la crisis. In R. Pozas, & M. Luna (Eds.), Las empresas y los empresarios en el México contemporéneo (pp. 357–395). Mexico City: Editorial Grijalba.Google Scholar
  78. Huntington, S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late 20th century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
  79. INEGI (1985). Estadisticas históricas de México. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Estadística Geografía e Informática.Google Scholar
  80. Jacobs, D., & Helms, R. (2001). Racial politics and redistribution: isolating the contingent influence of civil rights, riots, and crime on tax progressivity. Social Forces, 80, 91–121.Google Scholar
  81. Kaufman, R. (1988). The politics of debt in Argentina, Brazil and Mexico: Economic stabilization in the 1980s. Berkeley, CA: Institute of International Studies University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
  82. Kessler, T. P. (1998). Political capital: Mexican financial policy under Salinas. World Politics, 51, 36–66.Google Scholar
  83. Kessler, T. P. (1999). Global capital and national politics: Reforming Mexico’s financial system. Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  84. Kleinberg, R. B. (1999). Strategic alliances and other deals: State-business relations and economic reforms in Mexico. Durham: Carolina Academic.Google Scholar
  85. Knight, A. (2001). The modern Mexican state: theory and practice. In M. A. Centeno, & F. López-Alves (Eds.), The other mirror: Grand theory through the lens of Latin America (pp. 177–218). Princeton, N.J.; Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  86. Korzeniewicz, R. P. (1990). The limits to semiperipheral development: Argentina in the twentieth century. In W. G. Martin (Ed.), Semiperipheral states in the world-economy (pp. 97–124). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  87. Korzeniewicz, R., & Awbrey, K. (1992). Democratic transitions and the semiperiphery of the world-economy. Sociological Forum, 7, 609–640.Google Scholar
  88. Korzeniewicz, R., & Moran, T. (1997). World-economic trends in the distribution of income, 1965–1992. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 1000–1039.Google Scholar
  89. Lajous, A. (1988a). Cambios de funcionarios de la administración: Síntesis de 1983–1987. (Las razones y las obras gobierno de Miguel de la Madrid: Crónica del sexenio, 1982–1988.). Mexico City, Mexico: Presidencia de la República, Unidad de la Crónica Presidencial.Google Scholar
  90. Lajous, A. (1988b). Reordinación administrativa: Diciembre 1982. (Las razones y las obras gobierno de Miguel de la Madrid: Crónica del sexenio, 1982–1988.). Mexico City, Mexico: Presidencia de la República, Unidad de la Crónica Presidencial.Google Scholar
  91. Leicht, K. T., & Jenkins, J. C. (1998). Political resources and direct state intervention: the adoption of public venture capital programs in the American states, 1974–1990. Social Forces, 76, 1323–1345.Google Scholar
  92. Leuchtenburg, W. E. (1963). Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal, 1932–1940. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  93. Levine, R. F. (1988). Class struggle and the New Deal: Industrial labor, industrial capital, and the state. Lawrence, Kan.: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  94. Lindau, J. D. (1996). Technocrats and Mexico’s political elite. Political Science Quarterly, 111, 296–322.Google Scholar
  95. Liu, T. (1997). On whose side is the state? The German labor ministry and industrial relations, 1918–1933. Journal of Historical Sociology, 10, 361–388.Google Scholar
  96. Luna, M. (1992). Los empresarios y el cambio político, México, 1970–1987. Mexico City: Edición Era, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, UNAM.Google Scholar
  97. Luna, M. (1994). Los retos de la globalización: La reforma microeconomómica. (Análisis del surgimiento de la reforma microeconómica como materia de debate público). In R. Tirado (Ed.), Los empresario ante la globalización (pp. 194–221). Mexico City: Cámara de Diputados, Institute de Investigaciones Legislativas, UNAM and Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales.Google Scholar
  98. Luna, M. (2004). Business and politics in Mexico. In K. Middlebrook (Ed.), Dilemmas of political change in Mexico (pp. 332–352). San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexico Studies, University of California-San Diego.Google Scholar
  99. Luna, M., & Tirado, R. (1992). El Consejo Coordinador Empresarial. Una radiografía. Mexico City: UNAM, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales.Google Scholar
  100. Lustig, N. (1992). Mexico: The remaking of an economy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.Google Scholar
  101. MacLeod, D. (2004). Downsizing the state: Privatization and the limits of neoliberal reform in Mexico. University Park, Pa.: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Manza, J., & Cook, F. L. (2002). A democratic polity? Three views of policy responsiveness to public opinion in the United States. American Politics Research, 30, 630–667.Google Scholar
  103. Martin, W. G. (1990). Introduction: The challenge of the semiperiphery. In W. G. Martin (Ed.), Semiperipheral states in the world-economy (pp. 3–10). New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  104. Martínez Bengoa, J., & Díaz Pérez, A. H. (1996). Chile: The great transformation. Washington, D.C.: Brookings.Google Scholar
  105. Marx, K. (1977). Capital (vol. 1). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  106. Maxfield, S. (1989). International economic opening and government-business relations. In W. Cornelius, J. Gentleman, & P. H. Smith (Eds.), Mexico’s alternative political futures (pp. 215–236). San Diego: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California.Google Scholar
  107. Maxfield, S. (1990). Governing capital: International finance and Mexican politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  108. Maxfield, S., & Schneider, B. R. (1997). Business and the state in developing countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  109. Mayer, F. (1998). Interpreting NAFTA: The science and art of political analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  110. McCammon, H. (1994). Disorganizing and reorganizing conflict—outcomes of the states legal regulation of the strike since the Wagner act. Social Forces, 72, 1011–1049.Google Scholar
  111. Mena, L. F. B. (1987). COPARMEX and Mexican politics. In S. Maxfield, & R. A. Montoya (Eds.), Government and private sector in contemporary Mexico (pp. 89–104). San Diego, California: Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies, University of California at San Diego.Google Scholar
  112. Middlebrook, K., & Zepeda, E. (Eds.) (2003). Confronting development: Assessing Mexico’s economic and social policy challenges. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  113. Miliband, R. (1969). The state in capitalist society. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  114. Mingst, K. (1988). The Ivory Coast at the semi-periphery of the world economy. International Studies Quarterly, 32, 259–274.Google Scholar
  115. Mintz, B., & Palmer, D. (2000). Business and health care policy reform in the 1980s: the 50 states. Social Problems, 47, 327–359.Google Scholar
  116. Mizruchi, M., & Koenig, T. (1986). Economic sources of corporate political consensus. American Sociological Review, 51, 482–491.Google Scholar
  117. Nemeth, R. J., & Smith, D. A. (1985). International trade and world-system structure: a multiple network analysis. Review, 8, 517–560.Google Scholar
  118. Neuman, W. L. (1998). Negotiated meanings and state transformation: the trust issue in the progressive era. Social Problems, 45, 315–335.Google Scholar
  119. Otero, G. (1996). Neoliberalism revisited: Economic restructuring and Mexico’s political future. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.Google Scholar
  120. Paige, J. (1999). Conjuncture, comparison, and conditional theory in macrosocial inquiry. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 781–800.Google Scholar
  121. Pastor, M., & Wise, C. (1994). The origins and sustainability of Mexico’s free trade policy. International Organization, 48, 459–489.Google Scholar
  122. Pastor, M., & Wise, C. (1997). State policy, distribution and neoliberal reform in Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies, 29, 419–456.Google Scholar
  123. Poulantzas, N. (1976). The crisis of dictatorships: Portugal, Greece, Spain. London, Altantic Highlands: Humanities.Google Scholar
  124. Poulantzas, N. (1978a). Classes in contemporary capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  125. Poulantzas, N. (1978b). State, power, socialism. London: New Left Books.Google Scholar
  126. Prechel, H. (1990). Steel and the state: industry politics and business policy formation, 1940–1989. American Sociological Review, 55, 648–668.Google Scholar
  127. Prechel, H. (2000). Big business and the state. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  128. Prechel, H. (2003). Historical contingency theory, policy paradigm shifts, and corporate malfeasance at the turn of the 21st century. Research in Political Sociology, 12, 311–340.Google Scholar
  129. Puga, C. (1992). Empresarios medianos, pequeños y micro: problemas de organización y representación. Mexico City: Facultad y Ciencias Politicas y Sociales, Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, UNAM.Google Scholar
  130. Puga, C. (1993). Mexico: Empresarios y poder. Mexico City: Facultad de Ciencia Politicas y Sociales, UNAM y Miguel Angel Porrua.Google Scholar
  131. Quadagno, J. S. (1988). The transformation of old age security: Class and politics in the American welfare state. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  132. Quijano, J. M. (1981). Estado y banca privada. Mexico City: CIDE.Google Scholar
  133. Quijano, J. M., & Bendesky, L. (1983). Cambios recientes en el sistema financiero internacional. In J. M. Quijano (Ed.), La banca: Pasado y presente (problemas financieros Mexicanos) (pp. 95–160). Mexico City: CIDE.Google Scholar
  134. Quijano, J. M., & Berhens, F. A. (1985). La deuda externa del sector privado. In J. M. Quijano, H. Sanchez, & F. Antia (Eds.), Finanzas, desarollo ecónomico y penetración extranjera. Puebla, Mexico: Universidad Autonoma de Puebla.Google Scholar
  135. Radosh, R. (1972). The myth of the New Deal. In R. Radosh, & M. N. Rothbard (Eds.), A new history of Leviathan; Essays on the rise of the American corporate state (pp. 156–187). New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
  136. Robinson, W. I. (2000). Neoliberalism, the global elite, and the Guatemalan transition: a critical macrosocial analysis. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 42, 89–108.Google Scholar
  137. Robinson, W. I., & Harris, J. (2000). Towards a global ruling class? globalization and the transnational capitalist class. Science & Society, 64, 11–54.Google Scholar
  138. Rueschemeyer, D., & Evans, P. B. (1985). The state and economic transformation: Toward an analysis of the conditions underlying effective intervention. In P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, & T. Skocpol (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 3–43). Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  139. Sandoval, I. (2005). Intervencionismo liberal y desregulación financiera: evolución institucional del sector bancario en México. Revista Mexicana de Sociolgía, 67, 593–631.Google Scholar
  140. Schneider, B. R. (1998). The material bases of technocracy: Investor confidence and neoliberalism in Latin America. In M. Centeno, & P. Silva (Eds.), The politics of expertise (pp. 77–95). London: MacMillian.Google Scholar
  141. Schneider, B. R. (2004). Business politics and the state in twentieth-century Latin America. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  142. Schwartzman, K. (1989). The social origins of democratic collapse: The first Portuguese republic in the global economy. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
  143. Schwartzman, K. (1998). Globalization and democracy. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 159–181.Google Scholar
  144. Shadlen, K. (2004). Democratization without representation: The politics of small industry in Mexico. University Park: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  145. Silva, E. (1996). The state and capital in Chile: Business elites, technocrats, and market economics. Boulder, Colorado: Westview.Google Scholar
  146. Silver, B. (2003). Forces of labor: Workers’ movements and globalization since 1870. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  147. Skocpol, T. (1980). Political response to capitalist crisis: neo-marxist theories of the state and the case of the new deal. Politics and Society, 10, 155–201.Google Scholar
  148. Skocpol, T., & Amenta, E. (1986). States and social policies. Annual Review of Sociology, 12, 131–157.Google Scholar
  149. Smith, P. H. (1979). Labyrinths of power: Political recruitment in twentieth-century Mexico. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  150. Snyder, R. (1999). After neoliberalism: the politics of reregulation in Mexico. World Politics, 51, 173–204.Google Scholar
  151. Snyder, D., & Kick, E. (1979). Structural position in the world-system and economic growth, 1955–1970: a multiple network analysis of transnational interactions. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 1096–1126.Google Scholar
  152. Stallings, B. (1992). International influence on economic policy: Debt, stabilization, and structural reform. In S. Haggard, & R. Kaufman (Eds.), The politics of economic adjustment: International constraints, distributive conflicts, and the state (pp. 41–88). Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  153. Stallings, B., & Kaufman, R. (1989). Debt and democracy in Latin America. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  154. Stallings, B., & Peres, W. (2000). Growth, employment and equity: The impact of the economic reforms in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  155. Story, D. (1982). Trade politics in the third world: a case of the Mexican GATT decision. International Organization, 36, 767–794.Google Scholar
  156. Tamayo Flores, R. (1997). The determinants of industrial growth across Mexican regions. A review of empirical evidence and the role of public policies (Working document 57). Mexico City: Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas.Google Scholar
  157. Tardanico, R. (1984). Revolutionary Mexico and the world economy: the 1920s in theoretical perspective. Theory and Society, 13, 757–772.Google Scholar
  158. Teichman, J. (1995). Privatization and political change in Mexico. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  159. Teichman, J. (1996). Mexico: economic reform and political change. Latin American Research Review, 31, 252–262.Google Scholar
  160. Teichman, J. (1997). Mexico and Argentina: economic reform and technocratic decision making. Studies in Comparative International Development, 32, 31–55.Google Scholar
  161. Thacker, S. (1999). NAFTA coalitions and the political viability of neoliberalism in Mexico. Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs, 41, 57–89.Google Scholar
  162. Thacker, S. (2000). Big business, the state, and free trade: Constructing coalitions in Mexico. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  163. Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404.Google Scholar
  164. Tirado, R. (1987). Los empresarios y la política partidaria. Estudios Sociológicos, 5, 477–498.Google Scholar
  165. Tomaskovic-Devey, D., & Roscigno, V. (1996). Racial economic subordination and white gain in the U.S. South. American Sociological Review, 61, 565–589.Google Scholar
  166. Tsokhas, K. (1998). The Australian mining industry council, 1967–75. Business History, 40, 104–128.Google Scholar
  167. Useem, M. (1984). The inner circle: Large corporations and the rise of political activities in the U.S. and U.K. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  168. Valdés Ugalde, F. (1987). Hacía un nuevo liderazgo sociopolítico? Ensayo sobre la convocatoria social de los empresarios. Estudios Sociológicos, 5, 433–454.Google Scholar
  169. Valdés Ugalde, F. (1988). Los empresarios, la política y el estado. Cuadernos Políticos, 53, 47–70.Google Scholar
  170. Valdés Ugalde, F. (1997). Autonomía y legitimidad. Mexico City: Siglo Vientiuno Editores.Google Scholar
  171. Velasco Arregui, E. (1993). Industrial restructuring in Mexico during the 1980s. In R. Grinspun, & M. A. Cameron (Eds.), The Political economy of North American free trade (pp. 163–175). New York: St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  172. Vernon, R. (1963). The dilemma of Mexico’s development: The roles of the private and public sectors. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  173. Vogel, D. (1983). The power of business in America: a re-appraisal. British Journal of Political Science, 13, 19–43.Google Scholar
  174. Vogel, D. (1989). Fluctuating fortunes: The political power of business in America. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
  175. Wallerstein, I. (1974a). The modern world-system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  176. Wallerstein, I. (1974b). Rise and future demise of the world capitalist system: concepts for comparative analysis. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16, 387–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. Wallerstein, I. (1976). Semi-peripheral countries and the contemporary world crisis. Theory and Society, 3, 461–483.Google Scholar
  178. Wallerstein, I. (1979). The capitalist world economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  179. Wallerstein, I. (1985). The relevance of the concept of semiperiphery to southern Europe. In G. Arrighi (Ed.), Semiperipheral development: The politics of southern Europe in the twentieth century (pp. 31–39). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  180. Waterbury, J. (1993). Exposed to innumerable delusions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  181. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  182. Williams, M. E. (2001). Market reforms in Mexico: Coalitions, institutions, and the politics of policy change. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  183. Williamson, J. (1994). The political economy of policy reform. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  184. Wilson, G. (1985). Business and politics: A comparative introduction. London, England: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  185. Winders, B. (1999). The roller coaster of class conflict: class segments, mass mobilization, and voter turnout in the US, 1840–1996. Social Forces, 77, 833–862.Google Scholar
  186. Winters, J. (1996). Power in motion: Capital mobility and the Indonesian state. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  187. Zeitlin, M., Neuman, W. L., & Ratcliff, R. (1976). Class segments: agrarian property and political leadership in the capitalist class of chile. American Sociological Review, 41, 1006–1029.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology DepartmentBinghamton UniversityBinghamtonUSA

Personalised recommendations