Technology and institutions: living in a material world
- 1.3k Downloads
- 53 Citations
Abstract
This article addresses the relationship between technology and institutions and asks whether technology itself is an institution. The argument is that social theorists need to attend better to materiality: the world of things and objects of which technical things form an important class. It criticizes the new institutionalism in sociology for its failure to sufficiently open up the black box of technology. Recent work in science and technology studies (S&TS) and in particular the sociology of technology is reviewed as another route into dealing with technology and materiality. The recent ideas in sociology of technology are exemplified with the author’s study of the development of the electronic music synthesizer.
Keywords
Social Construction Material World Experimental Music Boundary Shifter Material PracticeNotes
Acknowledgments
An earlier version of this article was presented at the 2003 UC Santa Barbara conference “Cultural Turn IV: Instituting and Institutions”. I am particularly grateful for detailed written comments from John Mohr and Thomas Gieryn.
References
- Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technological objects. In W. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Alder, K. (1997). Engineering the revolution: Arms and enlightenment in France, 1763–1815. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Arthur, B. W. (1988). Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics. In P. W. Anderson, K. J. Arrow, & D. Pines (Eds.), The economy as an evolving complex system. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
- Barley, S., & Orr, J. E. (1997). Between craft and science: Technical work in U.S. settings. Ithaca, NY: ILR University Press.Google Scholar
- Bazerman, C. (1999). The language of Edison’s light. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London and Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Bijker, W. E. (1995a). On bikes bulbs and bakelites. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Bijker, W. E. (1995b). Sociohistorical technical studies. In S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Petersen, & T. Pinch (Eds.), Handbook of science and technology studies (pp. 229–256). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (Eds.) (1987). The social construction of technological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (Eds.) (1992). Shaping technology/building society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Bijsterveld, K., & Pinch, T. (2004). Sound studies: New technologies and music, special issue of Social Studies of Science, 34.Google Scholar
- Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1984). The social construction of reality. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Bloor, D. (1999). Anti-latour. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 30, 81–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bourdieu, P. (1999). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Boczkowski, P. J. (2004). Digitizing the news: Innovation in on-line newspapers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Braverman, H. (1975). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
- Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of Sty Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge (pp. 196–223). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1992). Don’t throw the baby out with the bath school: A reply to Collins and Yearley. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as culture and practice pp. 343–368. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Carroll-Burke, P. (2002). Material designs: Engineering cultures and engineering states—Ireland 1650–1900. Theory and Society, 31(1), 75–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Chadabe, J. (1997). Electric sound: The past and promise of electronic music. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Collins, H. M. (1974). The TEA-Set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Science Studies, 4, 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Collins, H. M. (1985). Changing order: Replication and induction in scientific practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Collins, H. M. (2001). Tacit knowledge, trust, and the Q of sapphire. Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 71–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Collins, H. M., & Yearley, S. (1992). Epistemological chicken. In A. Pickering (Ed.), Knowledge as culture and practice (pp. 301–326). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- David, P. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. Economic History, 75, 227–332.Google Scholar
- Dimaggio, P., & Hargittai, E. (2001). From the ‘Digital Divide’ to `Digital Inequality’: Studying internet use as penetration increases. Princeton Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Working Paper #15.Google Scholar
- DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). Introduction. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 1–38). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
- Fischer, C. (1992). America calling: A social history of the telephone to 1940. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back In: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 108–140). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books: New York.Google Scholar
- Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
- Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gieryn, T. F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Gieryn, T. F. (2002). What buildings do. Theory and Society, 31(1), 35–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
- Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Company.Google Scholar
- Hannah, M., & Strohmayer, U. (1991). Ornamentalism: Geography and the labor of the language of structuration theory. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 9, 309–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harper, D. (1987). Working knowledge: Skill and community in a small shop. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Heidegger, M. (1977). The question concerning technology and other essays. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
- Hughes, T. P. (1984). Networks of power: Electrification in western society, 1880–1930. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Ignatieff, M. (1978). A just measure of pain: Penitentiaries in the industrial revolution, 1780–1850. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, R. (1997). Technology and the market: George Eastman and the origins of mass Amateur Photography. In S. H. Cutcliffe, & T. S. Reynolds (Eds.), Technology and American history, a historical anthology from technology and culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Jepperson, R. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Kline, R., & Pinch, T. (1996). Users as agents of technological change: The social construction of the automobile in the rural United States. Technology and Culture, 37, 763–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation: Philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29–64.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. (1999). For David Bloor and beyond: A reply to David Bloor’s anti-latour. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science, 30, 113–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1979). Laboratory life: The social construction of scientific facts. Beverley Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Leuenberger, C., & Pinch, T. (2000). Social construction and neoinstitutional theory. Journal of Management Inquiry, 9(3), 271–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mackay, H., & Gareth, G. (1992). Extending the social shaping approach: Ideology and appropriation. Social Studies of Science, 22, 685–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacKenzie, D. (1984). Marx and the machine. Technology and Culture, 25, 473–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- MacKenzie, D. (1990). Inventing accuracy: A historical sociology of nuclear missile guidance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- MacKenzie, D., & Wajcman, J. (1985). The social shaping of technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Marx, L. (1994). The idea of ‘Technology’ and postmodern pessimism. In Y. Ezrahi, E. Mendelsohn, & H. Segal (Eds.), Technology, pessimism and postmodernity (pp. 11–28). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Merton, R. K. (1970). Science, technology & society in seventeenth century England. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.Google Scholar
- Meyer, J. W., & Rown, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 41–62). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Mizruchi, M. S., & Fein, L. C. (1999). The social construction of organizational knowledge: A study in the uses of coercive, mimetic, and normative Isomorphism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 653–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mohr, J. W., & Duquenne, V. (1997). The duality of culture and practice: Poverty relief in New York City, 1888–1917. Theory and Society, 26(2–3), 305–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mukerji, C. (2002). Material practices of domination: Christian humanism, the built environment, and techniques of Western power. Theory and Society, 31(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O’Connell, J. (1993). Metrology: The creation of universality by the circulation of particulars. Social Studies of Science, 23, 129–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ogburn, W. F. (1950). Social change with respect to culture and original nature. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
- Orr, J. E. (1996). Talking about machines: An ethnography of a modern job. Ithaca: ILR Press.Google Scholar
- Oudshoorn, N. & Pinch, T. (Eds.) (2003). How users matter: The co-construction of users and technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Pinch, T. (1996). The social construction of technology: A review. In R. Fox (Ed.), Technological change: Methods and themes in the history of technology (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: Harwood.Google Scholar
- Pinch, T. (2001). Why you go to a piano store to buy a synthesizer: Path dependence and the social construction of technology. In R. Garud, & P. Karnoe (Eds.), Path Dependence and Creation (pp. 381–401). New Jersey: LEA Press.Google Scholar
- Pinch, T. (2003). How the minimoog was sold to rock and roll. In N. Oudshoorn, & T. Pinch (2003) 247–720.Google Scholar
- Pinch, T., & Bijker, W. (1984). The social construction of facts and artifacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14, 399–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Pinch, T., & Trocco, F. (2002). Analog days: The invention and impact of the moog synthesizer. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Pinch, T., Ashmore, M., & Mulkay, M. (1992). Technology, testing, text: Clinical budgeting in the U.K. National Health Service. In W. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society (pp. 265–289). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Pinch, T., Collins, H., & Carbone, L. (1996). Inside knowledge: Second order measures of skill. Sociological Review, 44, 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Polanyi, M. (1958). Personal knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Powell, W. W. (1991). Expanding the scope of institutional analysis. In W. W. Powell, & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 183–203). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Powell, W. W., & DiMaggio, P. J. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Rader, K. (2004). Making mice: Standardizing animals for American biomedical research, 1900–1955. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Ravetz, J. (1971). Scientific knowledge and its social problems. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- Rowland, N. J., & Gieryn, T. F. (2008). Transfer Troubles: Outsourcing Information Technology in Higher Education. In T. Pinch, and R. Swedberg (Eds.), Living in a material world: Economic Sociology meets Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Schaffer, S. (1992). Late victorian metrology and its instrumentation: A manufacture of ohms. In R. Bud, & S. Cozzens (Eds.), Invisible connections: Instruments, institutions and science (pp. 23–56). Bellingham, WA: SPIE Optical Engineering Press.Google Scholar
- Scott, R. W. (1995). Institutions and organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Searle, J. (2006). Social ontology: Some basic principles. Anthropological Theory, 6(1), 12–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shapin, S. (1988). Understanding the Merton Thesis. Isis, 79(4), 594–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Soja, R. W. (1989). Postmodern geographies. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- Sorper, M. (1985). The spatial and temporal constitution of social action. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 3, 407–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Star, S. L., & Bowker, G. (1999). Sorting things out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19, 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sterne, J. (2003). The audible past: Cultural origins of sound reproduction. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
- Strathern, M. (1992). After nature: English kinship in the late twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Suchmann, L. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human–machine communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Théberge, P. (1997). Any sound you can imagine: Making music/consuming technology. Hanover: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
- Thompson, E. (2002). The Soundscape of modernity: Architectural acoustics and the culture of listening in America, 1900–1933. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Turner, V. W. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovations. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wajcman, J. (1991). Feminism confronts technology. College Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
- Winner, L. (1977). Autonomous technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L. (1973). Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Woolgar, S. (1985). Why not a sociology of machines? The case of sociology and artificial intelligence. Sociology, 19, 557–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Woolgar, S. (1991). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 58–100). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Yakubovich, V., Granovetter, M., & McGuire, P. (2004). Electric charges: The social construction of rate systems.Google Scholar