Advertisement

Theory and Society

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 85–102 | Cite as

Recovering the feminine other: masculinity, femininity, and gender hegemony

  • Mimi Schippers
Article

Abstract

R. W. Connell’s path-breaking notion of multiple masculinities (Connell, 1995) and hegemonic masculinity (Connell, 1987, 1995) have been taken up as central constructs in the sociology of gender. Although there has been a great deal of empirical research and theory published that has built upon and utilized Connell’s concepts, an adequate conceptualization of hegemonic femininity and multiple femininities has not yet been developed. To redress this, the author presents a theoretical framework that builds upon the insights of Connell and others, offers a definition of hegemonic masculinity and hegemonic femininity that allows for multiple configurations within each, and that can be used empirically across settings and groups. The author also outlines how hegemonic masculinity and hegemonic femininity are implicated in and intersect with other systems of inequality such as class, race, and ethnicity.

Keywords

Gender Relation Male Dominance Hegemonic Masculinity Subordinate Masculinity Masculine Characteristic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, E. (2002). Openly gay athletes: Contesting hegemonic masculinity in a homophobic environment. Gender and Society, 16(6), 860–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (2004). Undoing gender. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person and sexual politics. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  6. Connell, R. W. (1992). A very straight gay: Masculinity, homosexual experience, and the dynamics of gender. American Sociological Review, 57(6), 735–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  8. Connell, R. W. (2000). The men and the boys. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  9. Connell, R. W., & Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender and Society, 19, 829–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dellinger, K. (2004). Masculinities in ‘safe’ and ‘embattled’ organizations: Accounting for pornographic and feminist magazines. Gender and Society, 18(5), 545–566.Google Scholar
  11. Dowsett, G. W. (1993). I’ll show you mine, if you’ll show me yours: Gay men, masculinity research, men’s studies, and sex. Theory and Society, 22(5), 697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eskilsson, L. (2003). Masculinity and the North. In S. Ervo & T. Johansson (Eds.), Among men: Moulding masculinities, volume 1 (pp. 115–126). Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  13. Fejes, F. (2000). Making a gay masculinity. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 17(1), 113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fonesca, C. (2003). Philanderes, cuckolds, and wily women: Reexamining gender relations in a Brazilian working-class neighborhood. In M. C. Gutmann (Ed.), Changing men and masculinities in latin America (pp. 61–83). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality volume I: An introduction. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  16. Garlick, S. (2003). What is a man? Heterosexuality and the technology of masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 6(2), 156–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gutmann, M. C. (1996). The meanings of macho: Being a man in Mexico City. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Halberstam, J. (1998). Female masculinity. Durham: Duke.Google Scholar
  19. Hennen, P. (2005). Bear bodies, bear masculinity: Recuperation, resistance, or retreat? Gender and Society, 19(1), 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill Collins, P. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  21. Kimmel, M., Hearn J., & Connell, R. W. (2005). Handbook on studies on men & masculinities. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Kippax, S., & Smith, G. (2001). Anal intercourse and power in sex between men. Sexualities, 4(4), 413–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lambevski, S. A. (1999). Suck my nation-masculinity, ethnicity and the politics of (Homo)sex. Sexualities, 2(4), 397–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lorber, J. (1998). Men’s gender politics. Gender and Society, 12(4), 469–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lorber, J. (2000). Using gender to undo gender: A feminist degendering movement. Feminist Theory, 1, 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. MacKinnon, C. (1989). Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Martin, P. Y. (1998). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Reflections on Connell’s Masculinities. Gender and Society, 12(4), 472–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martin, P. Y. (2004). Gender as social institution. Social Forces, 82(4), 1249–1273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Messerschmidt, J. W. (2003). Flesh and blood: Adolescent gender diversity and violence. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  30. Messner, M. (1992). Power at play: Sports and the problem of masculinity. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  31. Pyke, K. D., & Johnson, D. L. (2003). Asian American women and racialized femininities: ‘Doing’ gender across cultural worlds. Gender and Society, 17(1), 33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schippers, M. (2002). Rockin’ out of the box: Gender maneuvering in alternative hard rock. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Segal, L. (1994). Straight sex: Rethinking the politics of pleasure. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, G., Kippax, S., & Chapple, M. (1998). Secrecy, disclosure, and the closet dynamics. Journal of Homosexuality, 35(1), 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Underwood, S. G. (2003). Gay men and anal eroticism: Tops, bottoms, and versatiles. New York: Harrington..Google Scholar
  36. West, C., & Zimmerman, D. (1987). Doing gender. Gender and Society, 1, 125–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+ Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology, Women’s Studies ProgramTulane UniversityNew OrleansUSA

Personalised recommendations