Two regularization types as two different Nambu-Iona-Lasinio models
- 19 Downloads
The Nambu-Iona-Lasinio models with 4-dimensional cutting and dimensional-analytical regularization types are compared. It is demonstrated that they describe two different models of light quark interaction. In the average-field approximation, the behavior of the scalar amplitude differs in the threshold region. Unlike the 4-dimensional cutting regularization in which the pole term corresponding to a sigma-meson can be separated near the threshold, the singularity of the scalar amplitude in the dimensional-analytical regularization is non-pole; moreover, it disappears completely for a certain value of the regularization parameter. One more significant difference between the two models is in the first-order expansion of the average field. The calculated meson contributions to the quark chiral condensate and dynamic quark mass demonstrate that despite their relative smallness, they can destabilize the Nambu-Iona-Lasinio model with 4-dimensional cutting regularization. On the contrary, the model with dimensional-analytical regularization is stabilized, which is manifested through a shift of regularization parameter values toward the stability region in which the contributions themselves decrease.
KeywordsQuark Mass Regularization Parameter Chiral Symmetry Dimensional Regularization Chiral Condensate
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 9.R. G. Jafarov and V. E. Rochev, Centr. Eur. J. Phys., No. 2, 367 (2004) [hep-ph/0311339].Google Scholar
- 10.W. Ochs, Plenary talk at “Hadron 03” (Aschaffenburg, Germany) [hep-ph/031144].Google Scholar
- 12.E. Babayev, Phys. Rev., D62, 074020 (2000); G. Ripka, Nucl. Phys., A683, 463 (2001).Google Scholar
- 14.V. E. Rochev, Talk given at the 17th International Workshop on High-Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory (QFTHEP’2003), Samara-Saratov (2003) [hep-ph/0312004].Google Scholar