Russian Journal of Genetics

, Volume 41, Issue 12, pp 1381–1388 | Cite as

Investigation of Chromosomes in Varieties and Translocation Lines of Pea Pisum sativum L. by FISH, Ag-NOR, and Differential DAPI Staining

  • T. E. Samatadze
  • O. V. Muravenko
  • N. L. Bolsheva
  • A. V. Amosova
  • S. A. Gostimsky
  • A. V. Zelenin
Plant Genetics


The DNA intercalator 9-aminoachridine was used for obtaining high-resolution DAPI patterns of chromosomes of Pisum sativum L. with more than 300 bands per haploid chromosome set. The karyotypes of three pea varieties, Viola, Capital, and Rosa Crown, and two translocation lines, L-108 (T2–4s) and M-10 (T2–7s), were examined. Based on the results of DAPI staining, we have identified chromosomes, constructed idiograms, and established breakpoints of chromosome translocations. Lines L-108 (T2–4s) and M-10 (T2–7s) were shown to appear as a result of respectively one translocation between chromosomes 2 and 4 and two translocations between chromosomes 2 and 7. All varieties and translocation lines of pea were examined using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with telomere repetition probes, 5S and 45S wheat rDNA probes. Transcriptional activity of 45S rRNA was detected by Ag-NOR staining. Telomere repetitions were shown to be located only in telomeric chromosome regions. Using high-resolution DAPI staining allowed us to verify localization of 5S genes on pea chromosomes 1, 3, and 5. 45S rDNAs were localized in the secondary constriction regions on the satellite and the satellite thread of chromosome 4 and on the satellite thread and in more proximal satellite heterochromatic region of chromosome 7. The size of 45S rDNA signal on chromosome 7 was larger and its transcriptional activity, higher than the corresponding parameters on chromosome 4 in most of the forms studied. A visual comparison of the results of FISH and Ag-NOR staining of normal and translocated pea chromosomes did not reveal any significant differences between them. The translocations of the satellite chromosomes apparently did not cause significant changes either in the amount of the ribosomal genes or in their transcriptional activity.


Pisum Sativum DAPI Staining Telomere Repetition Translocation Line rDNA Signal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bennett, M.D. and Leitch, I.J., Nuclear DNA Amounts in Angiosperms-583 New Estimates, Ann. Bot., 1997, vol. 80, pp. 169–196.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Murray, M.G., Peters, D.L., and Thompson, W.F., Ancient Repeated Sequences in the Pea and Mung Bean Genomes and Implication for Genome Evolution, J. Mol. Evol., 1981, vol. 17, pp. 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murray, M.G., Cuellar, R.T., and Thompson, W.F., DNA Sequence Organization in the Pea Genome, Biochemistry, 1978, vol. 17, pp. 5781–5790.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ingle, J., Timmis, J.N., and Sinclair, J., The Relationship between Satellite Deoxyribonucleic Acid, Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid Gene Redundensy, and Genome Size in Plants, Plant. Physiol., 1975, vol. 55, pp. 496–501.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ellis, T.H.N., Lee, D., Thomas, C.M., et al., 5S Ribosomal RNA Genes in Pisum—Sequence, Long-Range and Chromosomal Organization, Mol. Gen. Genet., 1988, vol. 214, pp. 333–342.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ellis, T.H.N., Turner, L., Hellens, R.P., et al., Linkage Maps in Pea, Genetics, 1992, vol. 130, pp. 649–663.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hall, K.J., Parken, J.S., and Ellis, T.H.N., The Relationship between Genetic and Cytogenetic Maps of Pea: I. Standart and Translocation Karyotypes, Genome, 1997, vol. 40, pp. 744–754.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neumann, P., Nouzova, M., and Macas, J., Molecular and Cytogenetic Analysis of Repetitive DNA in Pea (Pisum sativum L.), Genome, 2001, vol. 44, pp. 716–728.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blixt, S., Cytology of Pisum: II. Normal Karyotype, Agric. Hort. Genet., 1958, vol. 16, pp. 221–237.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Neumann, P., Pozarkova, D., Vrana, J., et al., Chromosome Sorting and PCR-Based Physical Mapping in Pea (Pisum sativum L.), Chromosome Res., 2002, vol. 10, no.1, pp. 63–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Samatadze, T.E., Muravenko, O.V., Zelenin, A.V., and Gostimsky, S.A., Identification of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Chromosomes by C-Banding Patterns, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 2002, vol. 387, no.5, pp. 714–717.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rawlins, D.J., Highert, M.I., and Shaw, P.J., Localization of Telomeres in Plant Interphase Nuclei by In Situ Hybrydization and 3D Confocal Microscopy, Chromosoma, 1991, vol. 100, pp. 424–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lyu, Fuchzhun, Marchenko, A.N. and Gostimsky, S.A., Identification of a New Translocation in Pea, Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 1997, vol. 357, pp. 713–716.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Caperta, A.D., Neves, N., Morais-Cecilio, L., et al., Genome Restructuring in Rye Affects the Expression, Organization and Disposition on Homologous rDNA Loci, J. Cell Sci., 2002, vol. 115, no.4, pp. 2839–2846.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Amosova, A.V., Badaev, N.S., D'yachenko, L.F., et al., Area of Ag-Stained Nucleolus Organizer Regions of Common Wheat Chromosomes Correlates with the Ribosomal Gene Content, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR, 1989, vol. 305, no.2, pp. 453–456.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Badaev, N.S., Amosova, A.V., Pukhalskiy, V.A., and Zelenin, A.V., Changes in Silver-Staining of Nucleolus organizer Regions, Rus. J. Genet., 1994, vol. 30, no.11, pp. 1303–1307.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Folkeson, D., Assignment of Linkage Segments to the Satellite Chromosomes 4 and 7 in Pisum sativum, Hereditas (Lund, Swed.), 1990, vol. 112, pp. 257–263.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muravenko, O.V., Badaeva, E.D., Amosova, A.V., et al., Localization of Human Ribosomal Gene DNA Probes on Barley Chromosomes, Rus. J. Genet., 2001, vol. 37, no.12, pp. 1452–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Badaeva, E.D., Friebe, B., and Gill, B.S., Genome Differentiation in Aegilops: 1. Distribution of Highly Repetitive DNA Sequences on Chromosomes of Diploid Species, Genome, 1996, vol. 39, no.2, pp. 293–306.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Badaeva, E.D., Amosova, A.V., Samatadze, T.E., et al., Genome Differentiation in Aegilops: 4. Evolution of the U-Genome Cluster, Plant Syst. Evol., 2004, vol. 246, pp. 45–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bol'sheva, N.L., Semenova, O.Yu., Muravenko, O.V., et al., Localization of Telomeric Sequences on Chromosomes of Two Flax Species, Biol. Membrany, 2005, vol. 22, no.3, pp. 227–231.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lacadena, J.R., Cermeno, M.C., Orellana, J., and Santos, J.L., Evidence for Wheat-Rye Nucleolar Competition (Amphiplasty) in Triticale by Silver-Staining Procedure, Theor. Appl. Genet., 1984, vol. 67, nos.3–4, pp. 207–213.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liu, J.Y., She, C.W., Hu, Z.L., et al., A New Chromosome Fluorescence Banding Technique Combining DAPI Staining with Image Analysis in Plants, Chromosoma, 2004, vol. 113, pp. 16–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Muravenko, O.V., Samatadze, T.E., and Zelenin, A.V., Computer and Visual Analyses of Chromosome G-Banding Patterns in Matricaria chamomilla, Biol. Membrany, 1998, vol. 15, no.6, pp. 670–678.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Muravenko, O.V., Amosova, A.V., Samatadze, T.E., et al., 9-Aminoacridine-An Efficient Reagent to Improve Human and Plant Chromosome Banding Patterns and to Standardize Chromosome Image Analysis, Cytometry, 2003, vol. 51, pp. 52–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Samatadze, T.E., Muravenko, O.V., Popov, K.V., and Zelenin, A.V., Genome Comparison of the Matricaria chamomilla L. Varieties by the Chromosome C-and OR-Banding Patterns, Caryologia, 2001, vol. 54, pp. 299–306.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fuchs, J., Kuhne, M., and Schubert, I., Assignment of Linkage Groups to Pea Chromosomes after Karyotyping and Gene Mapping by Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization, Chromosoma, 1998, vol. 107, pp. 272–276.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    ISCN, An International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature, Cytogenet. Cell. Genet., 1978, vol. 21, pp. 309–404.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Miller, D.A., Dev, V.G., Tantravahi, R., and Miller, O.J., Suppression of Human Nucleolus Organizer Activity in Mouse-Human Somatic Hybrid Cell, Exp. Cell Res., 1976, vol. 101, pp. 235–243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Miller, D.A., Tantravahi, R., Dev, V.G., et al., Frequency of Satellite Association of Human Chromosomes Is Correlated with Amount of Ag-Staining of the Nucleolus Organizer Region, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 1977, vol. 29, pp. 390–502.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hansman, I., Gebauer, J., Bihl, L., and Grimm, T., Onset of Nucleolus Organizer Activity in Early Mouse Embryogenesis and Evidence for Its Regulation, Exp. Cell Res., 1978, vol. 114, pp. 263–266.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hernandez-Verdun, D., The Nucleolus Today, J. Cell Sci., 1991, vol. 99, no.3, pp. 465–471.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Amosova, A.V., Podugol'nikova, O.A., and Kaminir, L.B., Quantitation of the Area of Ag-Stained Nucleolus Organizer Regions of Human Chromosomes, Tsitologiya, 1986, vol. 28, no.1, pp. 113–116.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lamm, R., Giemsa C-Banding and Silver-Staining for Cytological Studies in Pisum, Hereditas (Lund, Swed.), 1981, vol. 94, pp. 45–52.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© MAIK "Nauka/Interperiodica" 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. E. Samatadze
    • 1
  • O. V. Muravenko
    • 1
  • N. L. Bolsheva
    • 1
  • A. V. Amosova
    • 1
  • S. A. Gostimsky
    • 2
  • A. V. Zelenin
    • 1
  1. 1.Engelhardt Institute of Molecular BiologyRussian Academy of SciencesMoscowRussia
  2. 2.Department of GeneticsMoscow State UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations