Advertisement

Russian Chemical Bulletin

, Volume 59, Issue 10, pp 1896–1901 | Cite as

Liquid-phase hydroamination of cyclohexanone

  • D. P. Ivanov
  • K. A. DubkovEmail author
  • D. E. Babushkin
  • L. V. Pirutko
  • S. V. Semikolenov
Full Articles

Abstract

Activity and selectivity of supported Ni, Pt, and Pd catalysts were studied in the liquidphase reductive amination of cyclohexanone at temperatures ranging from 100 to 150 °C. The catalyst 20% Ni/SiO2 is most active and selective providing a maximum yield of cyclohexylamine. The influence of the reaction conditions on the parameters of the catalytic process was studied. A detailed analysis of the reaction products was carried out using 13C NMR spectroscopy and gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (GC-MS). This made it possible to refine the reaction mechanism and to identify a new by-product earlier unknown in the literature.

Key words

amination reductive amination cyclohexanone cyclohexylamine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. S. Hayes, Appl. Catal., 2001, 221, 187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalysis, Eds G. Ertl, H. Knözinger, J. Weitramp, Wiley-VHC, Weinheim, 1997, 5, 2334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. Becker, J. P. M. Niederer, M. Keller, W.F. Holderich, Appl. Catal. A, 2000, 197, 229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. A. Tarasevich, N. G. Kozlov, Usp. Khim., 1999, 68, 61 [Russ. Chem. Rev. (Engl. Transl.), 1999, 68, 55].Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pat. FR 529159, 24.11. 1921.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. D. Schwoegler, H. Adkins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1939, 61, 3499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. B. Klyuev, M. L. Khidekel’, Usp. Khim., 1980, 49, 28 [Russ. Chem. Rev. (Engl. Transl.), 1980, 49, 14].Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Gomez, J. P. Peters, T. Maschmeyer, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2002, 344, 1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    M. A. Popov, N. I. Shuikin, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser Khim., 1951, No. 2, 140 [Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. (Engl. Transl.), 1951, No. 2, 140].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Skita, F. Keil, Ber. Dtsch. Chem. Ges., 1928, 61, 1682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    E. R. Alexander, A. L. Misegades, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1948, 70, 1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Dolezal, O. Machalicky, M. Pavelek, P. Kubec, K. Hradkova, R. Hrdina, R. Sulakova, Appl. Catal. A, 2005, 286, 202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. V. R. Chary, K. K. Seela, D. Naresh, P. Ramakanth, Catal. Commun., 2008, 9, 75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.  2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. P. Ivanov
    • 1
  • K. A. Dubkov
    • 1
    Email author
  • D. E. Babushkin
    • 1
  • L. V. Pirutko
    • 1
  • S. V. Semikolenov
    • 1
  1. 1.G. K. Boreskov Institute of CatalysisSiberian Branch of the Russian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations