Russian Chemical Bulletin

, Volume 54, Issue 7, pp 1563–1568 | Cite as

Copper(II) complexes with N-(2-carboxyethyl)anthranilic acid H2CEAnt. Synthesis and crystal structure of [Cu(CEAnt)(H2O)] ⋅ H2O

  • Yu. A. Skorik
  • E. V. Osintseva
  • N. V. Podberezskaya
  • A. V. Virovets
  • L. K. Neudachina
  • A. A. Vshivkov
Article

Abstract

Protolytic equilibria and complexation of N-(2-carboxyethyl)anthranilic acid (H2CEAnt) with copper(II) ions in aqueous solutions were studied by UV spectroscopy and pH potentiometry. The H2CEAnt compound has no zwitterionic structure, and the protons are localized on the carboxy groups. The acid ionization constants of H3CEAnt+ (T = 25 °C, I = 0.1 M KNO3) are pK0 = 1.3±0.2 (=NH2+), pK1 = 3.88±0.02 (Alk-COOH), and pK2 = 5.28±0.02 (Ar-COOH). The model of complexation of H2CEAnt with copper(II) ions involves two deprotonated complexes [Cu(CEAnt)] and [Cu(CEAnt)2]2− (logβ = 6.31±0.04 and 8.0±0.2, respectively). The [Cu(CEAnt)(H2O)]⋅H2O complex was synthesized by the reaction of H2CEAnt with (CuOH)2CO3, and its structure was established by X-ray diffraction. The coordination polyhedron of Cu is intermediate between the tetragonal pyramid and trigonal bipyramid. The CEAnt2− ligand serves as a tetradentate chelating bridging ligand (Cu-O, 1.944(3) and 1.950(3) Å; Cu-O', 2.195(4) Å; Cu-N, 2.016(5) Å), and the fifth position of the polyhedron is occupied by a water molecule (Cu-Ow, 1.976(4) Å).

Key words

N-(2-carboxyethyl)anthranilic acid β-alanine aza-Michael reaction acid ionization constants copper(II) complexes crystal structure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Yu. A. Skorik, L. K. Neudachina, and A. A. Vshivkov, Zh. Obshch. Khim., 1999, 69, 296 [Russ. J. Gen. Chem., 1999, 69, 285 (Engl. Transl.)].Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yu. A. Skorik, G. V. Romanenko, L. K. Neudachina, and A. A. Vshivkov, Koord. Khim., 2001, 27, 845 [Russ. J. Coord. Chem., 2001, 27, 796 (Engl. Transl.)].Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yu. A. Skorik, G. V. Romanenko, L. K. Neudachina, and A. A. Vshivkov, Zh. Neorg. Khim., 2001, 46, 1845 [Russ. J. Inorg. Chem., 2001, 46, 1678 (Engl. Transl.)].Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Y. A. Skorik, G. V. Romanenko, C. A. R. Gomes, L. K. Neudachina, and A. A. Vshivkov, Polyhedron, 2002, 21, 2719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu. A. Skorik, N. V. Podberezskaya, G. V. Romanenko, E. V. Osintseva, L. K. Neudachina, and A. A. Vshivkov, Zh. Neorg. Khim., 2003, 48, 250 [Russ. J. Inorg. Chem., 2003, 48, 199 (Engl. Transl.)].Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A. K. Majumdar and J. G. Sengupta, Fresenius Z. Anal. Chem., 1960, 177, 265.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. L. Dinsel and T. R. Sweet, Anal. Chem., 1963, 35, 2077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. V. Ramakrishna and R. S. S. Murthy, Talanta, 1980, 27, 442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O. N. Rusina, P. N. Kovalenko, and Z. I. Ivanova, Zavod. Lab., 1966, 32, 276 [Ind. Lab., 1966, 32 (Engl. Transl.)].Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    H. Miche, V. Brumas, and G. Berthon, J. Inorg. Biochem., 1997, 68, 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Gaubert, M. Bouchaut, V. Brumas, and G. Berthon, Free Radical Res., 2000, 32, 451.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    J. Colonge, G. Descotes, and G. Frenay, Bull. Soc. Chim. France, 1963, 2264.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. T. S. D. Vasconcelos and A. A. S. C. Machado, Rev. Port. Quim., 1986, 28, 120.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Gans, A. Sabatini, and A. Vacca, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1985, 1195.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. A. Vshivkov, L. K. Neudachina, and V. P. Melkozerov, in Khimiya [Chemistry], Izd-vo MGU, Moscow, 1994, 96 (in Russian).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    G. M. Sheldrick, SHELX97, University of Gottingen, Germany, 1997.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. A. Azab, I. T. Ahmed, and M. R. Mahmoud, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 1995, 40, 523.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. Uhlig and D. Walther, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 1973, 397, 187.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yu. A. Skorik, E. V. Osintseva, N. V. Podberezskaya, G. V. Romanenko, L. K. Neudachina, and A. A. Vshivkov, Zh. Neorg. Khim., 2004, 49, 437 [Russ. J. Inorg. Chem., 2004, 49, 386 (Engl. Transl.)].Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. H. Lu, P. Chattopadhyay, F. L. Liao, and J. M. Lo, Anal. Sci., 2001, 17, 905.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    T. S. Shevchuk, A. F. Borina, I. I. Antipova-Karataeva, and A. K. Lyashchenko, Zh. Neorg. Khim., 1990, 35, 2955 [J. Inorg. Chem. USSR, 1990, 35 (Engl. Transl.)].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    A. W. Addison, T. W. Rao, J. Reedijk, J. van Rijn, and G. C. Verscher, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1984, 1349.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. S. Antsyshkina, G. G. Sadikov, A. L. Poznyak, and V. S. Sergienko, Zh. Neorg. Khim., 1998, 43, 241 [Russ. J. Inorg. Chem., 1998, 43, 187 (Engl. Transl.)].Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. Cremer and J. A. Pople, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1975, 97, 1354.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. I. Kitaigorodskii, Organicheskaya kristallokhimiya [Organic Crystal Chemistry], Izd-vo AN SSSR, Moscow, 1955, p. 15 (in Russian).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yu. A. Skorik
    • 1
  • E. V. Osintseva
    • 2
  • N. V. Podberezskaya
    • 3
  • A. V. Virovets
    • 3
  • L. K. Neudachina
    • 1
  • A. A. Vshivkov
    • 1
  1. 1.A. M. Gorky Ural State UniversityEkaterinburgRussian Federation
  2. 2.Ural Scientific Research Institute of MetrologyEkaterinburgRussian Federation
  3. 3.A. V. Nikolaev Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Siberian BranchRussian Academy of SciencesNovosibirskRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations