Advertisement

Research on Language and Computation

, Volume 4, Issue 2–3, pp 203–228 | Cite as

Alignment as the Basis for Successful Communication

  • Martin J. Pickering
  • Simon Garrod
Article

Abstract

Pickering and Garrod (2004) argued that alignment is the basis of successful communication in dialogue. In other words, successful communication goes hand-in-hand with the development of similar representations in the interlocutors. But what exactly does this mean? In this paper, we attempt to define alignment, contrasting alignment of situation models with alignment of linguistic representations. We then speculate on how these notions are related and why they lead to conversational success

Keywords

dialogue alignment situation model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aijmer K. (1996). Conversational Routines in English: Convention and Creativity. Longman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Altmann G.T.M., Kamide Y. (1999). Incremental Interpretation at Verbs: Restricting the Domain of Subsequent Reference. Cognition 73:247–264Google Scholar
  3. Branigan H.P., Pickering M.J., Cleland A.A. (2000). Syntactic Coordination in Dialogue. Cognition 75:B13–B25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan S.E., Clark H.H. (1996) Conceptual Pacts and Lexical Choice in Conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22:1482–1493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks P., Tomasello M. (1999) Young Children Learn to Produce Passives with Nonce Verbs. Developmental Psychology 35:29–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chartrand T.L., Bargh J.A. (1999) The Chameleon Effect: The Perception-behavior Link and Social Interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76:893–910CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark E.V. (1993). The Lexicon in Acquisition. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark H.H. (1996). Using Language. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark H. H., Marshall C. R. (1981) Definite Reference and Mutual Knowledge. In Joshi A., Webber B., Sag I. A. (eds.), Elements of Discourse Understanding. Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark H.H., Schaefer E.F. (1987). Concealing One’s Meaning from Overhearers. Journal of Memory and Language 26:209–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clark H.H., Wilkes-Gibbs D. (1986). Referring as a Collaborative Process. Cognition 22:1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cleland A.A., Pickering M.J. (2003). The Use of Lexical and Syntactic Information in Language Production: Evidence from the Priming of Noun-phrase Structure. Journal of Memory and Language 49:214–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Danet B. (1980). ‘Baby’ or ‘Fetus?’ Language and the Construction of Reality in a Manslaughter Trial. Semiotica 32:187–219Google Scholar
  14. Ericsson K.A., Kintsch W. (1995). Long-term Working Memory. Psychological_ Review 102:211–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fadiga L., Craighero G., Buccino G., Rizzolatti G. (2002). Speech Listening Specifically Modulates the Excitability of Tongue Muscles: A TMS study. European Journal of Neuroscience 15:399–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fodor J.A., Bever T.G., Garrett M.F. (1974). The Psychology of Language. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Fowler C.A., Brown J., Sabadini L., Weihing J. (2003). Rapid Access to Speech Gestures in perception: Evidence from Choice and Simple Response Time Tasks. Journal of Memory and Language. 49:296–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garrod S., Anderson A. (1987). Saying What You Mean in Dialogue: A Study in Conceptual and Semantic Co-ordination. Cognition 27:181–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garrod S., Doherty G. (1994). Conversation, Coordination and Convention: An Empirical Investigation of how Groups Establish Linguistic Conventions. Cognition 53: 181–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garrod S., Pickering M.J. (2004). Why is Conversation So Easy?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:8–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garrod S., Pickering M. J. (in press) Automaticity in Language Production in Monologue and Dialogue. In Wheeldon L., Meyer A. (eds.), Language and Executive Processes. Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Goldinger S.A. (1998) Echoes of echoes? An Episodic Theory of Lexical Access. Psychological Review 105:251–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Greenwald A.G., Banaji M.R. (1995) Implicit Social Cognition: Attitudes, Self Esteem, and Stereotypes. Psychological Review 102: 4–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gries S.T. (2005) Syntactic Priming: A Corpus-based Approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34:365–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hartsuiker R. J., Pickering M. J., Veltkamp E. (2004) Is Syntax Separate or Shared Between Languages? Crosslinguistic Syntactic Priming in Spanish/English Bilinguals. Psychological Science, 15, pp. 409–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haywood S. L., Pickering M. J., Branigan H. P. (2005) Do Speakers Avoid Ambiguities During Dialogue? Psychological Science, 16, pp. 362–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A Framework for Perception and Action Planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24:849–937CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Horton W. S., and Keysar B. (1996) When Do Speakers Take into Account Common Ground? Cognition, 59, pp. 91–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Horton W.S., Gerrig R.J. (2005) Conversational Common Ground and Memory Processes in Language Production. Discourse Processes 40:1–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hurley S., Chater N. (eds) (2005). Perspectives on Imitation, 2 Vols. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  31. Isaacs E.A., Clark H.H. (1987). References in Conversations between Experts and Novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 116:26–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jackendoff R. (1999). Parallel Constraint-based Generative Theories of Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3:393–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jackendoff R. (2002). Foundations of Language. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jefferson G. (1987). On Exposed and Embedded Corrections in Conversation. In: Button G., Lee J.R.E. (eds). Talk and Social Organisation. Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, pp. 86–100Google Scholar
  35. Johnson-Laird P.N. (1983). Mental models: Toward a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference and Consciousness. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuiper K. (1996). Smooth Talkers: The Linguistic Performance of Auctioneers and Sportscasters. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  37. Levelt W.J.M. (1989). Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  38. Levelt W.J.M., Kelter S. (1982). Surface Form and Memory in Question Answering. Cognitive Psychology 14:78–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Levinson S. C. (2003) Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  40. Lewis D.K. (1969). Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  41. Meltzoff A., Moore M.K. (1977). Imitation of Facial and Manual Gestures by Human Neonates. Science 198:75–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nunberg G., Sag I.A., Wasow T. (1994). Idioms. Language 70:491–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pickering M.J., Garrod S. (2004). Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27: 169–225Google Scholar
  44. Pickering M.J., Garrod S. (2005) Establishing and Using Routines During Dialogue: Implications for Psychology and Linguistics. In: Cutler A. (eds). Twenty-First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 85–101Google Scholar
  45. Rizzolatti G., Arbib M.A. (1998). Language within Our Grasp. Trends in Neurosciences 21:188–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sanford A.J., Garrod S.C. (1981). Understanding Written language. Wiley, Chichester, UKGoogle Scholar
  47. Schober M. F. (1993). Spatial Perspective Taking in Conversation. Cognition, 47, pp. 1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schober M. F. (1995) Speakers, Addressees, and Frames of Reference: Whose Effort is Minimized in Conversations about Locations? Discourse Processes, 20, pp. 219–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schoonbaert S., Hartsuiker R. J., Pickering M. J. (in press) The Representation of Lexical and Syntactic Information in bilinguals: Evidence from Syntactic Priming. Journal of Memory and Language Google Scholar
  50. Szmrecsanyi B. (2005) Creatures of Habit: A Corpus-Linguistic Analysis of Persistence in Spoken English. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1, pp. 113–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tannen D. (1989). Talking voices: Repetition, Dialogue, and Imagery in Conversational Discourse. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Tabor W., Juliano C., Tanenhaus M.K. (1997). Parsing in a Dynamical System: An Attractor-based Account of the Interaction of Lexical and Structural Constraints in Sentence Processing. Language and Cognitive Processes 12:211–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Watson M. E., Pickering, M. J., Branigan H. P. (2004) Alignment of Reference Frames in Dialogue. Proceedings of the 26th Cognitive Science Meeting Mahwah, NJ, ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  54. Zwaan R.A., Radvansky G.A. (1998) Situation Models in Language Comprehension and Memory. Psychological Bulletin 123:162–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK

Personalised recommendations