Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 67–92

Does insurance fraud in automobile theft insurance fluctuate with the business cycle?



Financial institutions face various cyclical risks, but very few studies have analyzed the cyclicality of operational risk. External fraud is an important operational risk faced by insurers. In this research, we analyze the empirical relationship between insurance fraud and the business cycle and we concentrate our study on two insurance contracts that may create an incentive to defraud. We find that residual insurance fraud exists both in the contract with replacement cost endorsement and the contract with no-deductible endorsement in the Taiwan automobile theft insurance market. These results are consistent with previous literature on the relationship between fraud activity and non-optimal insurance contracting. We also show that the severity of insurance fraud is countercyclical. Fraud is stimulated during periods of recession and mitigated during periods of expansion. Although this last result seems intuitive, our contribution is the first to measure its significance.


Operational risk Insurance fraud Replacement cost endorsement No-deductible endorsement Automobile theft insurance Business cycle 

JEL Classifications

G22 G20 D80 D81 


  1. Allen, L., & Bali, T. (2007). Cyclicality in catastrophic and operational risk measurements. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 1191–1235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Artis, M., Ayuso, M., & Guillen, M. (2002). Detection of automobile insurance fraud with discrete choice models and misclassified claims. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 69, 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates, L. J., Mukherjee, K., & Santerre, R. E. (2010). Medical insurance coverage and health production efficiency. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 77, 211–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bond, E. W., & Crocker, K. J. (1997). Hardball and soft touch: the economics of optimal insurance contracts with costly state verification and endogenous monitoring costs. Journal of Public Economics, 63, 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyer, M. M. (2001). Mitigating insurance fraud: lump-sum awards, premium subsidies, and indemnity taxes. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 68, 403–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boyer, M. M. (2004). Overcompensation as a partial solution to commitment and renegotiation problems: the cost of ex post moral hazard. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 71, 559–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chernobai, A., Jorion, P., & Yu, F. (2011). The determinants of operational risk in U.S. financial institutions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 68, 1683–1725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chiappori, P. A., & Salanié, B. (2012). Asymmetric information in insurance markets: Empirical assessments. In G. Dionne (Ed.), Handbook of insurance (second edition). Springer, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  9. Crocker, K. J., & Morgan, J. (1998). Is honesty the best policy? curtailing insurance fraud through optimal incentive contracts. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 355–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crocker, K. J., & Tennyson, S. (1999). Costly state falsification or verification? theory and evidence from bodily injury liability claims. In C. Laberge-Nadeau & G. Dionne (Eds.), Automobile insurance: Road safety, new drivers, risks, insurance fraud and regulation (pp. 119–130). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Derrig, R. (2002). Insurance fraud. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 69, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dionne, G. (2012). The empirical measure of information problems with emphasis on insurance fraud and dynamic data. In G. Dionne (Ed.), Handbook of insurance (second edition). Springer, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  13. Dionne, G., & Gagné, R. (2001). Deductible contracts against fraudulent claims: evidence from automobile insurance. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dionne, G., & Gagné, R. (2002). Replacement cost endorsement and opportunistic fraud in automobile insurance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 24, 213–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dionne, G., Gouriéroux, C., & Vanasse, C. (2001). Testing for evidence of adverse selection in the automobile insurance market: a comment. Journal of Political Economy, 109(2), 444–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dionne, G., Giuliano, F., & Picard, P. (2009). Optimal auditing with scoring: theory and application to insurance fraud. Management Science, 22, 58–70.Google Scholar
  17. Dionne, G., Michaud, P. C., Dahchour, M. (2011). Separating moral hazard from adverse selection and learning in automobile insurance: longitudinal evidence from France. Journal of the European Economic Association (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  18. Husted, B. W. (1999). Wealth, culture, and corruption. Journal of International Business Studies, 30, 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Picard, P. (1996). Auditing claims in the insurance market with fraud: the credibility issue. Journal of Public Economics, 63, 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Picard, P. (2012). Economic analysis of insurance fraud. In G. Dionne (Ed.), Handbook of insurance (second edition). Springer, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  21. Weiss, M. A., Tennyson, S., & Regan, L. (2010). The effect of regulated premium subsidies on insurance costs: an empirical analysis of automobile insurance. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 77, 597–624.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Canada Research Chair in Risk Management, HEC MontrealMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Department of InsuranceTamkang UniversityTamsuiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations