Does sorry work? The impact of apology laws on medical malpractice

Article

Abstract

Physicians’ apologies for adverse medical events are acknowledged as a factor in patients’ decisions to litigate. Apology laws which render physicians’ apologies inadmissible in court are written to encourage patient-physician communication and to overcome the physicians’ disinclination to apologize because apologies could invite lawsuits. We present a novel model of apologies and malpractice in order to examine whether state-level apology laws have an impact on malpractice lawsuits and settlements. Using a difference-in-differences estimation, we find that apology laws could expedite the resolution process. We also find that apology laws result in the greatest reduction in average payment size and settlement time in cases involving severe patient outcomes.

Keywords

Apologies Apology laws Medical malpractice Litigation 

JEL Classification

K13 K32 

References

  1. American Tort Reform Association (2009). ATRA tort reform record. Electronic Version: ATRA.Google Scholar
  2. Baicker, K., & Chandra, A. (2006). The labor market effects of rising health insurance premiums. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 609–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boothman, M., Blackwell, A., Campbell, D., Commiskey, E., & Anderson, S. (2009). A better approach to medical malpractice claims? The University of Michigan experience. J Health Life Sci Law, 2(2), 125–159, Jan.Google Scholar
  5. Born, P., Viscusi, W. K., & Baker, T. (2009). The effects of tort reform on medical malpractice insurers’ ultimate losses. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 76(1), 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandra, A., Nundy, S., & Seabury, S. A. (2005). The growth of physician medical malpractice payments: evidence from the national practitioner data bank. Health Affairs (Millwood). Suppl Web Exclusives: W5-240-W5-249. PubMed PMID:15928255, Jan-Jun.Google Scholar
  7. Currie, J., & MacLeod, W. B. (2008). First do no harm? Tort reform and birth outcomes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 795–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Daughety, A., & Reinganum, J. (2000). On the economics of trials: adversarial process, evidence, and equilibrium bias. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 16(2), 365–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Division of Practitioner Data Banks, Bureau of Health Professions, Health Resources and Services Administration (2004). National practitioner data bank public use data file.Google Scholar
  10. Durrance, C. P. (2009). Noneconomic damage caps and medical malpractice claim frequency: a policy endogeneity approach. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 26(3), 569–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Farber, H. S., & White, M. J. (1994). A comparison of formal and informal dispute resolution in medical malpractice. The Journal of Legal Studies, 23(2), 777–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finkelstein, D. M., Moore, D. F., & Schoenfeld, D. A. (1993). A proportional hazards model for truncated AIDS data. Biometrics, 49(3), 731–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gibson, R. B., & Del Vecchio, L. A. (2006). Does “sorry” work? effects of “full disclosure” on litigation. For the Defense, 48, 41.Google Scholar
  14. Hannan, T. H., & McDowell, J. M. (1984). The determinants of technology adoption: the case of the banking firm. The Rand Journal of Economics, 15(3), 328–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hickson, G. B., Clayton, E. W., Githens, P. B., & Sloan, F. A. (1992). Factors that prompted families to file medical malpractice claims following perinatal injuries. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267(10), 1359–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ho, B. (2011). Apologies as signals: with evidence from a trust game. Management Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  17. Ho, B., & Liu, E. (2011). What’s an apology worth? Difference-in-differences analysis of state apology laws on medical malpractice payouts. Journal of Empirical Leagl Studies, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  18. Kachalia, A., Kaufman, S. R., Boothman, R., Anderson, S., Welch, K., Saint, S., et al. (2010). Liability claims and costs before and after implementation of a medical error disclosure program. Annals of Internal Medicine, 153(4), 213–221.Google Scholar
  19. Kraman, S. S., & Hamm, G. (1999). Risk management: extreme honesty may be the best policy. Annals of Internal Medicine, 131(12), 963–967.Google Scholar
  20. Lamb, R. M., Studdert, D. M., Bohmer, R., Berwick, D. M., & Brennan, T. (2003). Hospital disclosure practices: results of a national survey. Health Affairs, 22, 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Liebman, C. B., & Hyman, C. S. (2004). A mediation skills model to manage disclosure of errors and adverse events to patients. Health Affairs, 23(4), 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liebman, C. B., & Hyman, C. S. (2005). Medical error disclosure, mediation skills, and malpractice litigation: A demonstration project in Pennsylvania. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  23. Matsa, D. A. (2007). Does malpractice liability keep the doctor away? Evidence from tort reform damage caps. The Journal of Legal Studies, 36(S2), S143–S182.Google Scholar
  24. Mazor, K. M., Simon, S. R., Yood, R. A., Martinson, B. C., Gunter, M. J., Reed, G. W., et al. (2004). Health plan members’ views about disclosure of medical errors. Annals of Internal Medicine, 140(6), 409–418.Google Scholar
  25. McDonnell, W. M., & Guenther, E. (2008). Narrative review: do state laws make it easier to say “I’m sorry?”. Annals of Internal Medicine, 149(11), 811–815.Google Scholar
  26. Morse, M. A. (2009). Medical apology laws, mandatory reporting, and adverse event reporting under the PSQIA. Caesars Palace Las Vegas, NV.Google Scholar
  27. Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., & Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Polinsky, A. M., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1988). The deterrent effects of settlements and trials. International Review of Law and Economics, 8(1), 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robbennolt, J. K. (2003). Apologies and legal settlement: an empirical examination. Michigan Law Review, 102(3), 460–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sloan, F. A., & Hsieh, C. R. (1995). Injury, liability, and the decision to file a medical malpractice claim. Law & Society Review, 29(3), 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Spier, K. E. (1992). Incomplete contracts and signalling. The Rand Journal of Economics, 23(3), 432–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Spier, K. E. (2002). Settlement with multiple plaintiffs: the role of insolvency. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 18(2), 295–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vincent, C., Phillips, A., & Young, M. (1994). Why do people sue doctors? A study of patients and relatives taking legal action. The Lancet, 343(8913), 1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Viscusi, W. K., & Born, P. H. (2005). Damages caps, insurability, and the performance of medical malpractice insurance. The Journal of Risk and Insurance, 72(1), 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wu, A. W. (1999). Handling hospital errors: is disclosure the best defense? Annals of Internal Medicine, 131(12), 970–972.Google Scholar
  36. Wu, A., Huang, I., Stokes, S., & Pronovost, P. (2009). Disclosing medical errors to patients: it’s not what you say, it’s what they hear. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24(9), 1012–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.University of HoustonHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations