Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

, Volume 40, Issue 3, pp 197–218 | Cite as

How do people value extended warranties? Evidence from two field surveys

  • Marieke Huysentruyt
  • Daniel Read


Extended warranties are popular but expensive. This paper examines how consumers value these warranties, and asks whether economic considerations alone can account for their popularity. Results from two field surveys show that consumers greatly overestimate both the likelihood and the cost of product breakdown. However, these biases alone do not explain their willingness to buy warranties. In fact, we find evidence of probability neglect, in which warranty purchase decision depends on the magnitude of the possible consequences of not having insurance and not on the probability of having to suffer these consequences. The expected emotional benefits from having a warranty was the best predictor of purchase decision and willingness to pay. We also found that people with higher cognitive skills are less likely to overestimate the economic determinants of warranty value, yet are still highly influenced by emotional considerations when deciding whether to purchase a warranty.


Personal finance Warranty Cognitive skills 


D14 M30 D81 


  1. Akerlof, G. (1970). The market for lemons: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron, J., Hershey, J. C., & Kunreuther, H. (2000). Determinants of priority for risk reduction: the role of worry. Risk Analysis, 20(4), 413–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benjamin, D., Brown, S. A., & Shapiro, J. (2006). Does cognitive ability reduce psychological bias? mimeo, Harvard University and University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Berner, R. (2004). “The warranty windfall,” Business Week 12/20/2004.Google Scholar
  5. Camerer, C., Issacharoff, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (2003). Regulation for conservatives: behavioral economics and the case for ‘asymmetric paternalism’. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 151, 1211–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caplin, H., & Healy, J. (2001). Psychological expected utility theory and anticipatory feelings. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 55–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cawley, J. P., Heckman, J., & Vytlacil, E. (2001). Three observations on wages and measured cognitive ability. Labour Economics, 8, 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen, T., Kalra, A., & Sun, B. (2009). Why do consumers buy extended service contracts? Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 611–623.Google Scholar
  9. Competition Commission (2003). Extended warranties on domestic electrical goods: A report on the supply of extended warranties on domestic electrical goods within the UK. Inquiry Report: Competition Commission.Google Scholar
  10. Competition Commission. (2005). The supply of extended warranties on domestic electrical goods order 2005 regulatory impact assessment. Evaluation Reports.Google Scholar
  11. Consumer Reports. (2005). Extended warranties: say yes, sometimes. Consumer Reports, January 2005.Google Scholar
  12. Cutler, D., & Zeckhauser, R. (2003). Extending the theory to meet the practice of insurance. mimeo, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  13. Eisner, R., & Strotz, R. H. (1961). Flight insurance and the theory of choice. Journal of Political Economy, 69, 350–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fang, H., Keane, M., & Silverman, D. (2008). Sources of advantageous selection: evidence from the Medigap insurance market. Journal of Political Economy, 116(2), 303–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Finucane, M., Slovic, P., Hibbard, J., Peters, E., Mertz, C., & MacGregor, D. (2002). Aging and decision-making competence: an analysis of comprehension and consistency skills in older versus younger adults considering health-plan options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15, 141–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42.Google Scholar
  17. Gabaix, X., & Laibson, D. (2006). Shrouded attributes, consumer myopia, and information suppression in competitive markets. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 505–539.Google Scholar
  18. Hogarth, R., & Kunreuther, H. (1995). Decision making under ignorance: arguing with yourself. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 10, 15–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hsee, C. K., & Kunreuther, H. (2000). The affection effect in insurance decision. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20(2), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huber, O., Beutter, C., Montoya, J., & Huber, O. W. (2001). Riskdefusing behaviour: Towards an understanding of risky decision making. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13, 409–426.Google Scholar
  21. Johnson, E., Hershey, J., Meszaros, J., & Kunreuther, H. (1993). Framing, probability distortions and insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 7, 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kovalchik, S., Camerer, C., Grether, D., Plott, C., & Allman, J. (2005). Aging and decision making: a broad comparative study of decision behaviour in neurologically healthy elderly and young individuals. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 58, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kunreuther, H., Novemsky, N., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Making low probabilities useful. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23, 103–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., & Combs, B. (1978). Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 551–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. J. Davidson, R. K. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Loewenstein, G. F., Hsee, C. K., Weber, E. U., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lusardi, A. (2008). Financial literacy: An essential tool for informed consumer choice? Working Paper, Dartmouth College.Google Scholar
  29. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2007a). Baby boomer retirement security: the role of planning, financial literacy, and housing wealth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54, 205–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lusardi, A., & Mitchell, O. S. (2007b). Financial literacy and retirement preparedness: Evidence and implications for financial education. Business Economics, 35–44.Google Scholar
  31. Malester, J. (2004). Harvey reports slightly lower sales. Business News, 3/23/2004.Google Scholar
  32. O’Brien, K. J. (2009). Google’s strength may be part of Microsoft defense strategy. New York Times, May 7, 2009.
  33. Peters, E., Vastfjall, D., Slovic, P., Mertz, C. K., Mazzocco, K., & Dickert, S. (2006). Numeracy and decision making. Psychological Science, 17(5), 407–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rabin, M., & Thaler, R. H. (2001). Risk Version. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15, 219–232.Google Scholar
  35. Rottenstreich, Y., & Hsee, C. K. (2001). Money, kisses, and electric shocks: on the affective psychology of risk. Psychological Science, 12, 185–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stanovich, R. E., & West, F. (1998). Cognitive ability and variation in selection task performance. Thinking and Reasoning, 4(3), 193–230.Google Scholar
  38. Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Terrorism and probability neglect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26(2/3), 121–136.Google Scholar
  39. Trumbull, G. (2006). Consumer capitalism: politics, product markets, and firm strategy in France and Germany. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Warranty Week. (2005). Extended warranty income. Warranty Week, October 25, 2005,
  41. Warranty Week. (2006). Extended warranty pricing. Warranty Week, October 26, 2006.
  42. Williamson, J., Ranyard, R., & Cuthbert, L. (2000). Risk management in everyday insurance decisions: evidence from a process tracing study. Risk Decision and Policy, 5, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementLondon School of EconomicsLondonUK
  2. 2.SITEStockholm School of EconomicsStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Durham Business SchoolDurham UniversityDurhamUK
  4. 4.Yale School of ManagementNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations