Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

, Volume 40, Issue 1, pp 57–83 | Cite as

Valuing fatal risks to children and adults: Effects of disease, latency, and risk aversion

  • James K. HammittEmail author
  • Kevin Haninger


We examine heterogeneity of willingness to pay (WTP) to reduce risks of fatal disease and trauma to adults and children. Using a stated-preference survey fielded to a large, nationally representative internet panel, we find that WTP to reduce fatal-disease risks (caused by consuming pesticide residues on foods) are similar for several types of cancer and non-cancer diseases and similar to WTP to reduce motor-vehicle crashes. WTP to reduce risk to one’s child is uniformly larger than to reduce risk to another adult or to oneself. Estimated values per statistical life are $6–10 million for adults and $12–15 million for children.


Value of statistical life Cancer Stated preference Pesticide Children 

JEL Classification

D61 D64 H43 I18 Q18 Q51 



This work was supported by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (R830824) and a Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Health & Society Scholars fellowship to Kevin Haninger. We thank the six physicians who reviewed the symptom descriptions for accuracy (John Ayanian, Atul Gawande, Lucian Leape, Grace Lee, Matthew Miller, Eric Schneider), Nicolas Treich who encouraged us to include a test for risk aversion in the survey (using the bonus-points lottery), Mary Evans who discussed an early version of the paper at the 2009 American Economic Association / Association of Environmental and Resource Economists annual meeting, Kip Viscusi and other conference participants at the Vanderbilt Law School Heterogeneity of the Value of Statistical Life conference, and participants at the University of Paris Descartes Health, Inequalities, Risk, and Public Policy conference, the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, Society for Risk Analysis, and European Group of Risk and Insurance Economists annual meetings, and seminar participants at Erasmus University School of Economics.


  1. Agee, M. D., & Crocker, T. D. (1996). Parental altruism and child lead exposure: inferences from the demand for chelation therapy. Journal of Human Resources, 31, 677–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberini, A. (1995). Efficiency vs bias of willingness-to-pay estimates: bivariate and interval-data models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alberini, A., Cropper, M., Krupnick, A., & Simon, N. B. (2004). Does the value of a statistical life vary with age and health status? Evidence from the US and Canada. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48, 769–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alberini, A., Cropper, M., Krupnick, A., & Simon, N. B. (2006). WTP for mortality risk reductions: does latency matter? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 32, 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aldy, J. E., & Viscusi, W. K. (2008). Adjusting the value of a statistical life for age and cohort effects. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 573–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barsky, R. B., Juster, F. T., Kimball, M. S., & Shapiro, M. D. (1997). Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the Health and Retirement Study. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 537–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blomquist, G. C., Miller, T. R., & Levy, D. T. (1996). Values of risk reduction implied by motorist use of protection equipment: new evidence from different populations. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 30, 55–66.Google Scholar
  8. Corso, P. S., Hammitt, J. K., & Graham, J. D. (2001). Valuing mortality-risk reduction: using visual aids to improve the validity of contingent valuation. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23, 165–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cropper, M. L., & Oates, W. E. (1992). Environmental economics: a survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 675–740.Google Scholar
  10. Cropper, M. L., & Sussman, F. G. (1990). Valuing future risks to life. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 19, 160–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dickie, M. T., & Gerking, S. (2006). Valuing children’s health: parental perspectives. In P. Scapecchi (Ed.), Economic valuation of environmental health risks to children. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  12. Dickie, M., & Messman, V. L. (2004). Parental altruism and the value of avoiding acute illness: are kids worth more than parents? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48, 1146–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Drèze, J. (1962). L’Utilité Sociale d’une Vie Humaine. Revue Française de Recherche Opérationelle, 6, 93–118.Google Scholar
  14. Eeckhoudt, L. R., & Hammitt, J. K. (2004). Does risk aversion increase the value of mortality risk? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47, 13–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. European Commission. (2000). Recommended interim values for the value of preventing a fatality in DG environment cost benefit analysis. Accessed 4 July 2009.
  16. EuroQol Group. (1990). EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy, 16, 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: a critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fuchs, V. R., & Zeckhauser, R. (1987). Valuing health—a ‘priceless’ commodity. American Economic Review, 77, 263–268.Google Scholar
  19. Hammitt, J. K. (2000). Evaluating contingent valuation of environmental health risks: the proportionality test. Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Newsletter, 20(1), 14–19. Reprinted in Stated Preference: What Do We Know? Where Do We Go? (Proceedings), Report number EE-0436, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, October.Google Scholar
  20. Hammitt, J. K., & Graham, J. D. (1999). Willingness to pay for health protection: inadequate sensitivity to probability? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 18, 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hammitt, J. K., & Haninger, K. (2007). Willingness to pay for food safety: sensitivity to duration and severity of illness. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 89, 1170–1175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hammitt, J. K., & Liu, J.-T. (2004). Effects of disease type and latency on the value of mortality risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 28, 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanemann, W. M., Loomis, J., & Kanninen, B. (1991). Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 73, 1255–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. HM Treasury. (2003). The green book: Appraisal and evaluation in Central Government, London. Accessed 4 July 2009.
  25. Jenkins, R. R., Owens, N., & Wiggins, L. B. (2001). Valuing reduced risks to children: the case of bicycle safety helmets. Contemporary Economic Policy, 19, 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johannesson, M., Johansson, P.-O., Kristom, B., & Gerdtham, U.-G. (1993). Willingness to pay for antihypertensive therapy—further results. Journal of Health Economics, 12, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones-Lee, M. W. (1974). The value of changes in the probability of death or injury. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 835–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones-Lee, M. W., Hammerton, M., & Philips, P. R. (1985). The value of safety: results of a national sample survey. Economic Journal, 95, 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kochi, I., Hubbell, B., & Kramer, R. (2006). An empirical Bayes approach to combining and comparing estimates of the value of a statistical life for environmental policy analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 34, 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li, C.-Z., & Mattson, L. (1995). Discrete choice under preference uncertainty: an improved structural model for contingent valuation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28, 256–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu, J.-T., Hammitt, J. K., Wang, J.-D., & Liu, J.-L. (2000). Mother’s willingness to pay for her own and her child’s health: a contingent valuation survey in Taiwan. Health Economics, 9, 319–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Magat, W. A., Viscusi, W. K., & Huber, J. (1996). A reference lottery metric for valuing health. Management Science, 42, 1118–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ng, Y.-K. (1992). The older the more valuable: divergence between utility and dollar values of life as one ages. Journal of Economics, 55, 1–16.Google Scholar
  34. Revesz, R. L. (1999). Environmental regulation, cost-benefit analysis, and the discounting of human lives. Columbia Law Review, 99, 941–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rothschild, M., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1970). Increasing Risk: 1. A definition. Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Savage, I. (1993). An empirical investigation into the effect of psychological perceptions on the willingness-to-pay to reduce risk. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shaw, J. W., Johnson, J. A., & Coons, S. J. (2005). US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Medical Care, 43, 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shepard, D. S., & Zeckhauser, R. J. (1984). Survival versus consumption. Management Science, 30, 423–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sunstein, C. R. (1997). Bad deaths. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sunstein, C. R. (2004). Valuing life: a plea for disaggregation. Duke Law Journal, 45, 385–445.Google Scholar
  41. U.S. Office of Management and Budget. (2008). 2009 discount rates for OMB Circular No. A-94. December 12.Google Scholar
  42. Van Houtven, G., Sullivan, M. B., & Dockins, C. (2008). Cancer premiums and latency effects: a risk-tradeoff approach for valuing reductions in fatal cancer risks. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 36, 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Viscusi, W. K. (1985). A Bayesian perspective on biases in risk perception. Economic Letters, 17, 59–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Viscusi, W. K. (1989). Prospective reference theory: toward an explanation of the paradoxes. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2, 235–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Viscusi, W. K., & Aldy, J. E. (2003). The value of a statistical life: a critical review of market estimates throughout the world. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27, 5–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Viscusi, W. K., Magat, W. A., & Huber, J. (1987). An investigation of the rationality of consumer valuations of multiple health risks. RAND Journal of Economics, 18, 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Viscusi, W. K., Magat, W. A., & Forrest, A. (1988). Altruistic and private valuations of risk reduction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 7, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Risk AnalysisHarvard UniversityBostonUSA
  2. 2.AAAS Science & Technology Policy FellowU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations