Learning from mistakes: What do inconsistent choices over risk tell us?
- 939 Downloads
We implement a risk experiment that allows for judgment errors to investigate who makes mistakes and whether it matters. The experiments are conducted with a random sample of the adult population in Rwanda, and data on financial decisions are collected. We find a high proportion of inconsistent choices, with over 50% of the participants making at least one mistake. Importantly, errors are informative. While risk aversion alone does not explain financial decisions, risk aversion and inconsistent choices interact in significant and sensible ways. As we would expect, risk-averse individuals are more likely to belong to a savings group and less likely to take out an informal loan. For those more likely to make mistakes, however, as they become more risk averse, they are less likely to belong to a savings group and more likely to take up informal credit, suggesting that mistakes correlate with less than optimal behavior.
KeywordsRisk preferences Inconsistent choices Financial decisions Experiments
JEL ClassificationC91 D81
Petrie thanks the World Council of Credit Unions (WOCCU) for funding the survey and allowing us the use of the data. We also thank Marco Castillo, James Cox and Vjollca Sadiraj for the helpful comments. Suggestions from an anonymous referee and the editor greatly improved the paper.
- Bellemare, C., & Shearer, B. (2006). Sorting, incentives and risk preferences: evidence from a field experiment. IZA Working Paper No. 2227.Google Scholar
- Benjamin, D., Brown, S. A., & Shapiro, J. M. (2006). Who is ‘behavioral’? Cognitive ability and anomalous preferences. Working Paper, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
- Castillo, M., Ferraro, P., Jordan, J., & Petrie, R. (2008). The today and tomorrow of kids. Working Paper, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
- Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. (2005). Individual risk attitudes: new evidence from a large, representative, experimentally-validated survey. IZA Working Paper No. 1730.Google Scholar
- Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2007). Are risk aversion and impatience related to cognitive ability? IZA Discussion Paper No. 2735.Google Scholar
- Harrison, G., & Rutström, E. (2007). Risk aversion in the laboratory. Working Paper 07-03, Department of Economics, University of Central Florida.Google Scholar
- Holt, C. A. (1986). Preference reversals and the independence axiom. American Economic Review, 76, 508–515.Google Scholar
- Holt, C., & Laury, S. (2006). Further reflections on prospect theory. Working Paper, Georgia State University.Google Scholar
- Meier, S., & Sprenger, C. (2007). Impatience and credit behavior: evidence from a field experiment. Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Working Paper Series, No. 07-3.Google Scholar
- Petrie, R. (2002). Rwanda credit unions member & non-member survey 2002. World Council of Credit Unions, Research Monograph Series, No. 20.Google Scholar
- Ortmann, A., & Hertwig, R. (2006). Monetary incentives: usually neither necessary nor sufficient? CERGE-EI Working Paper 307, Prague.Google Scholar
- Prasad, K., & Salmon, T. C. (2007). Self selection and market power in risk sharing contracts. Working Paper, Florida State University.Google Scholar
- Segal, C. (2006). Misbehavior, education, and labor market outcomes. Working Paper, Universidad Pompeu Fabre.Google Scholar
- Stockman, C. (2006). Differences and similarities in health risk preferences across two subject cohorts. Working Paper, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
- Tanaka, T., Camerer, C. F., & Nguyen, Q. (2007). Risk and time preferences: experimental and household survey data from Vietnam. Working Paper, California Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Westen, D. (1996). Psychology: mind, brain and culture. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar