Advertisement

Journal of Risk and Uncertainty

, Volume 35, Issue 3, pp 285–305 | Cite as

Behavior towards health risks: An empirical study using the “Mad Cow” crisis as an experiment

  • Jérôme AddaEmail author
Article

Abstract

The paper exploits the “Mad Cow” crisis as a natural experiment to gain knowledge on the behavioral effect of new health information. The analysis uses a detailed data set following a sample of households through the crisis. The paper disentangles the effect of non-separable preferences across time from the effect of previous exposure. It shows that new health information interacts in a non-monotonic way with disease susceptibility. Individuals at low or high risk of infection do not respond to new health information. The results show that individual behavior partly offsets the effect of new health information.

Keywords

Health risks Health behavior Intra-household decision 

JEL Classification

D1 D8 C3 

References

  1. Adda, Jérôme and Francesca Cornaglia. (2006). “Taxes, Cigarette Consumption and Smoking Intensity,” American Economic Review 96(4), 1013–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antoñanzas, Fernando, W. Kip Viscusi, Joan Rovira, Francisco J. Braña, Portillo Fabiola, and Iirineu Carvalho. (2000). “Smoking Risks in Spain: Part I Perception of Risks to the Smoker,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 21(2/3), 161–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker, Gary S. and Casey B. Mulligan. (1997). “The Endogenous Determination of Time Preference,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(3), 729–758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, Gary S. and Kevin M. Murphy. (1988). “A Theory of Rational Addiction,” Journal of Political Economy 96(4), 675–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourguignon, François. (1999). “The Cost of Children: May the Collective Approach to Household Behavior Help?” Journal of Population Economics 12(4), 503–521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Browning, Martin and Pierre-André Chiappori. (1998). “Efficient Intra-Household Allocations: A General Characterization and Empirical Tests,” Econometrica 66(6), 1241–1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chesher, Andrew. (1997). “Diet Revealed? Semiparametric Estimation of Nutrient Intake-Age Relationships,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 160(3), 389–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deaton, Angus and John Muellbauer. (1980). “An Almost Ideal Demand System,” American Economic Review 70(3), 312–326.Google Scholar
  9. Ehrlich, Isaac and Hiroyuki Chuma. (1990). “A Model of the Demand for Longevity and the Value of Life Extension,” Journal of Political Economy 98(4), 761–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Farrell, Phillip and Victor Fuchs. (1982). “Schooling and Health: The Cigarette Connection,” Journal of Health Economics 1, 217–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Green, Peter J. and Bernard W. Silverman. (1994). Nonparametric Regression and Generalised Linear Models: A Roughness Penalty Approach. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
  12. Gruber, Jonathan. (2001). “Risky Behavior among Youth: An Economic Analysis.” In Jonathan Gruber (ed), Risky Behavior Among Youth: An Economic Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hurd, Michael, Daniel MacFadden, and Angela Merrill. (2001). “Predictions of Mortality among the Elderly.” In David Wise (ed), Themes in the Economics of Aging. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hurd, Michael D. and Kathleen McGarry. (1995). “Evaluation of the Subjective Probabilities of Survival in the Health and Retirement Study,” Journal of Human Resources 30(0), S268–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hurd, Michael D. and Kathleen McGarry. (2002). “The Predictive Validity of Subjective Probabilities of Survival,” Economic Journal 112(482), 966–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Khwaja, Ahmed, Frank Sloan, and Sukyung Chung. (2006). “The Effects of Spousal Health on the Decision to Smoke: Evidence on Consumption Externalities, Altruism and Learning within the Household,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 32(1), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McElroy, Marjorie. (1990). “The Empirical Content of Nash Bargained Household Behavior,” Journal of Human Resources 25, 559–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nichèle, Véronique and Jean-Marc Robin. (1995). “Simulation of Indirect Tax Reforms Using Pooled Micro and Macro French Data,” Journal of Public Economy 56, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pollak, Robert A. (1970). “Habit Formation and Dynamic Demand Functions,” Journal of Political Economy 78(4), 745–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Viscusi, W. Kip and Joni Hersch. (2001). “Cigarette Smokers as Job Risk Takers,” Review of Economics and Statistics 83(2), 269–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Viscusi, W. Kip (1990). “Do Smokers Underestimate Risks?” Journal of Political Economy 98(6), 1253–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Viscusi, W. Kip (1993). “The Value of Risks to Life and Health,” Journal of Economic Literature 31, 1912–1946.Google Scholar
  23. Viscusi, W. Kip (1997). “Alarmist Decisions with Divergent Risk Information,” The Economic Journal 107, 1657–1670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Viscusi, W. Kip, Welsey A. Magat, and Joel Huber. (1987). “An Investigation of the Rationality of Consumer Valuations of Multiple Health Risks,” Rand Journal of Economics 18(4), 465–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Viscusi, W. Kip and Michael J. Moore. (1989). “Rates of Time Preference and Valuations of the Duration of Life,” Journal of Public Economics 38, 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Institute for Fiscal StudiesLondonUK

Personalised recommendations