Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Ultimate Beneficiaries of Continuing Professional Development Programs: Middle School Students’ Nature of Science Views

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effective continuing professional development (CPD) programs primarily aim to have an impact on teachers’ knowledge bases, beliefs, and views and their classroom practices, which rationally lead most of the researchers to investigate those changes on teachers primarily. Although neglected, the interrelationship between CPD programs and students is considered complex, and CPDs ultimately aim to have an impact on students’ views, too. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to survey the changes of middle school students’ views of the nature of science (NOS) by providing a large-scale CPD to their teachers and, in other words, identify the impact of CPD on ultimate beneficiaries, namely students. In this study, 10 science teachers’ data and, in the first phase, 481 and, in the second phase, 422 students’ data and the changes in their NOS views were analyzed. Results showed that the students’ and teachers’ NOS views changed positively. For the impact of teachers on the students’ views, the teachers’ prior NOS knowledge, years of experience, and the number of implemented activities were found to be the influential factors for the transmission of NOS views.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2004). Over and over and over again: college students’ views of nature of science. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 389–425). Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82(4), 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education., 22(7), 665–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. S. (2005). “How should I know what scientists do? I’m just a kid”: fourth-grade students’ conceptions of NOS. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V., & Donnelly, L. A. (2010). Teaching nature of science to K-2 students: what understandings can they attain? International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 97–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., & Hanuscin, D. L. (2007). Teaching nature of science through inquiry: results of a 3-year professional development program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(5), 653–680.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Influence of a reflective explicit activity-based approach on elementary teachers’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 295–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Cullen, T. A., & Hanson, D. L. (2009). Fostering a community of practice through a professional development program to improve elementary teachers’ views of nature of science and teaching practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(10), 1090–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V. L., Buck, G. A., Donnelly, L. A., Nargund-Joshi, V., & Weiland, I. S. (2011). The importance of teaching and learning nature of science in the early childhood years. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 537–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerson, V., Nargund-Joshi, V., Weiland, I., Pongsanon, K., & Avsar, B. (2014). What third-grade students of differing ability levels learn about nature of science after a year of instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 36(2), 244–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1989). Project 2061, science for all Americans. Washington, D.C.

  • Barnea, N., Dorı, Y.J, Fınegold, M. (1995). Model perception among pre- and in-service chemistry teachers. Paper Presented at The Annual Association For Research in Science Teaching Conference. San Francisco, April.

  • Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (2003). Understandings of the nature of science and decision making on science and technology based issues. Science Education, 87(3), 352–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini, J. A., & Colburn, A. (2000). Teaching the nature of science through inquiry to prospective elementary teachers: a tale of two researchers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 177–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank, R. K., & Alas, N. (2009). Effects of teacher professional development on gains in student achievement: how meta-analysis provides scientific evidence useful to education leaders. In Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness. Washington, ABD: The Council of Chief State School Officers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickhouse, N. W. (1990). Teachers’ beliefs about the nature of science and their relation-ship to classroom practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broad, K., & Evans, M. (2006). A review of literature on professional development content and delivery modes for experienced teachers. University of Toronto, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.

  • Cakmakci, G. (2012). Promoting pre-service teachers’ ideas about nature of science through educational research apprenticeship. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(2), 114–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakmakci, G., & Yalaki, Y. (2012). Promoting student teachers’ ideas about nature of science through popular media. Trondheim: S-TEAM/NTNU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capps, D. K., & Crawford, B. A. (2013). Inquiry-based professional development: what does it take to support teachers in learning about inquiry and nature of science? International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 1947–1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capps, D. K., Crawford, B. A., & Constas, M. A. (2012). A review of empirical literature on inquiry professional development: alignment with best practices and a critique of the findings. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(3), 291–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S., Evans, R., Honda, M., Jay, E., & Unger, C. (1989). ‘An experiment is when you try it and see if it works’: a study of grade 7 students’ understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 514–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cerbin, W., & Kopp, B. (2006). Lesson study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and improving teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 250–257 ISSN 1812-9129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (2001). Beyond certainty: taking an inquiry stance on practice. In Teachers caught in the action: professional development that matters (pp. 45–58).

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching for high standards: what policymakers need to know and be able to do (CPRE Joint Report Series, JRE-04). Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education and the National Commission on Teaching & America’s Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1999). Investing in teaching as a learning profession: policy problems and prospects. In Teaching as the learning profession: handbook of policy and practice (pp. 376–411).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dass, P. M., & Yager, R. E. (2009). Professional development of science teachers: history of reform and contributions of the STS-Based Iowa Chautauqua program. Science Education Review, 8(3), 99–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, F., Chen, D. T., Tsai, C. C., & Chai, C. H. (2011). Students’ views of the nature of science: a critical review of research. Science Education, 95(6), 961–999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, N. (2011). What went wrong? Literature students are more informed about the nature of science than science students. Education and Science, 36(159), 219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, N., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2008). Turkish grade 10 students’ and science teachers’conceptions of nature of science: a national study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 45(10), 1083–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, N., & Özcan, B. (2010). Influence of historical perspective approach on 7th grade students’ views about nature of science. Ahi Evran Univ. Kirsehir Education Faculty Journal, 11(4), 187–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, N., Çakiroglu, J., Çavus, S., Bilican, K., & Arslan, O. (2011). Developing science teachers’ nature of science views: the effect of in-service teacher education program. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 40, 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, N, Çakmakçi, G., Irez, S., Yalaki Y., Erdas, E., Kaya, G., Han Tosunoglu, Ç., Bala, V.G., Özer, F., Ertugrul, G., Sardag, M., Altiner, Z.B., Köylü, N.Z. & Günsever, G. (2016). Etkinliklerle bilimin dogasinin ögretimi. Y. Yalaki (Ed.). Extended 2nd Edition. Ankara: Pegem Academic Publishing. http://www.pegem.net/kitabevi/191701-Etkinliklerle-Bilimin-Dogasinin-Ogretimi-e-kitap-kitabi.aspx. Accessed 20 May 2016.

  • Erdas, E. (2015). Supporting the teachers’ professional development through the process about teaching NOS: a continuing professional development program model. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Abant İzzet Baysal University.

  • Farmer, B. (1994). From science teacher to technology facilitator: a case study of Katharine. Research in Science Education, 24, 68–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers’ College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, J. J. (1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garet, M.S., Cronen, S., Eaton, M., Kurki, A., Ludwig, M., Jones, W., Uekawa, K., Falk, A. (2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Educational Sciences Report, NCEE 2008–4030, Sep. 2008.

  • Grek, S. (2009). Governing by numbers: the PISA ‘effect’ in Europe. Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930802412669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. (1994). Professional development in education: in search of the optimal mix. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: new paradigms and practices (pp. 114–132). New York: Teachers College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guskey, T. (2000). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95, 145–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: a new consensus. In Teaching as the learning profession: handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–150).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, J. I., Daehler, K. R., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L. W. (2012). Differential effects of three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, D., Thomas, K., & Lawrenz, F. (2003). Relationship between professional development, teachers’ instructional practices, and the achievement of students in science and mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 103(8), 378–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irez, S. (2006). Are we prepared?: an assessment of preservice science teacher educators’ beliefs about nature of science. Science Education, 90(6), 1113–1143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R. (2008). The development of seventh graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 470–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khishfe, R., & Lederman, N. (2006). Teaching nature of science within a controversial topic: integrated versus nonintegrated. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4), 395–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilic, K., Sungur, S., Cakiroglu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2005). Ninth grade students’ understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 28(2005), 127–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. Y., & Irving, K. E. (2010). History of science as an instructional context: student learning in genetics and nature of science. Science & Education, 19(2), 187–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kırıkkaya, E. B., & Güllü, D. (2008). Fifth grade students’ misconceptions about heat temperature and evaporation—boiling. Elementary Education Online, 7(1), 15–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koray, Ö., Özdemir, M., & Tatar, N. (2005). Primary school student’s misconceptions about “units”: example of mass and weigh. Elementary Education Online, 4(2), 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. A. J. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubitskey, B., Fishman, B., & Marx, R. (2003). The relationship between professional development and student learning: exploring the link through design research. In Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL. Retrieved November (Vol. 12, p. 2003).

  • Lauer, A. P., Christopher, D. E., Firpo-Triplett, R., & Buchting, F. (2014). The impact of short-term professional development on participant outcomes: a review of the literature. Professional Development in Education, 40(2), 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G. (2007a). Nature of science: past, present and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 31–79). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum.

  • Lederman, N. G. (2007b). Nature of science: past, present, and future. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 771–790.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman J. S., & Holliday G. (2011). Young children’s views of science scoring guide. Unpublished paper: Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL.

  • Lederman, J. S., & Khishfe, R. (2002). Views of nature of science, form D. Unpublished paper. Chicago: Illinois Institute of Technology.

  • Lederman, J.S., & Lederman, N.G. (2004). Early elementary students’ and teachers’ understanding of nature of science and scientific inquiry: lessons learned from Project ICAN. Paper presented at the NARST 2004, Annual Conference, Vancouver.

  • Lederman, J. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of nature of science. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. II, pp. 600–620). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L. (1987). Science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: do they realty influence teaching behavior? Science Education, 71(5), 721–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. Y., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). Taiwanese gifted students’ views of nature of science. School Science and Mathematics, 102(3), 114–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loucks-Horsley, S., & Matsumoto, C. (1999). Research on professional development for teachers of mathematics and science: the state of the scene. School Science and Mathematics, 99(5), 258–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: a further appraisal. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (Ed.). (1998). The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer (Springer) Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F. (Ed.). (2002). The nature of science in science education: rationales and strategies. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of National Education (MONE). (2013). Science curricula for middle schools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2000). The aging mind: Opportunities in cognitive research. National Academies Press

  • Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Öz, A. (2012). The contribution of religious education and moral education teachers to the professional development of the religious education classes held in the Ministry of Education: Istanbul province sample. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Marmara University, Istanbul.

  • Özer, F. (2014). The effects of a professional development program on middle school students’ views of NOS. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Abant Izzet Baysal University.

  • Özer, F., Dogan, N., Yalaki, Y., Irez, S. & Cakmakci, G. (2015). Investigation of the Link between Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Programs and Students’ NOS Views. NARST (National Association for Research in Science Teaching) Annual Conference 2015, Chicago, IL., USA.

  • Özer, F., Dogan, N., Yalaki, Y., Irez, S., & Cakmakci, G. (2017). A contextualized nature of science classroom activity: junk food! Journal of Inquiry-Based Activities (JIBA), 7(2), 93–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavez, J. M., Vergara, C. A., Santibañez, D., & Cofré, H. (2016). Using a professional development program for enhancing Chilean biology teachers’ understanding of nature of science (NOS) and their perceptions about using history of science to teach NOS. Science & Education, 25(3–4), 383–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posnanski, T. J. (2010). Developing understanding of the nature of science within a professional development program for in-service elementary teachers: project nature of elementary science teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21, 589–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001). Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice. Newcastle upon Tyne: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, F. J., & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, K., Gross, K., Vossen, R., Richert, A., & Jeschke, S. (2016). Preparing for industry 4.0–collaborative virtual learning environments in engineering education. In Automation, communication and cybernetics in science and engineering 2015/2016 (pp. 417–427). Manila City: Springer International.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. S., & Lederman, N. G. (2002). “It’s the nature of the beast”: the influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: an explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education, 88(4), 610–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22 (pp. 212–216). New York: Routledge.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, J. J. A., & Finegold, M. (1995). Models in physics: perceptions held by final-year prospective physical science teachers studying at South African universities. International Journal of Science Education, 17(5), 621–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, D. (2002). Designing powerful professional development for teachers and principals. Oxford: National Staff Development Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiles, K. E., Loucks-Horsley, S., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (Eds.). (1998). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & LaMaster, S. U. (1995). Relationships between metaphors, beliefs, and actions in a context of science curriculum change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(3), 225–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., Butler Kahle, J., & Fraser, B. (1990). Windows into Classrooms. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, C. (2005). Traveling the road to differentiation in staff development. Journal of Staff Development, 26(8), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Topçu, M. S., & Pekmez, E. Ş. (2009). Turkish middle school students’ difficulties in learning genetics concepts. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(2), 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. (Ed.). (2009). Teacher quality (education policy white paper). Washington, DC: National Academy of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, K. S., Duncan, T., Lee, S. W. Y., Scarloss, B., Shapley, K. L. (2007). Reviewing the evidence on how teacher professional development affects student achievement. Issues & Answers. REL 2007-No. 033. Regional Educational Laboratory Southwest (NJ1).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the TUBITAK, MONE, and BIDOMEG project team for their support.

Funding

This study was supported by the TUBITAK (the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey) under the grant number 111K527.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ferah Özer

  2. Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Bolu, Turkey

    Nihal Doğan

  3. Department of Primary Education, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

    Yalçın Yalaki

  4. Department of Secondary Biology Education, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Serhat Irez

  5. Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey

    Gültekin Çakmakci

Authors
  1. Ferah Özer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nihal Doğan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yalçın Yalaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Serhat Irez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gültekin Çakmakci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferah Özer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Özer, F., Doğan, N., Yalaki, Y. et al. The Ultimate Beneficiaries of Continuing Professional Development Programs: Middle School Students’ Nature of Science Views. Res Sci Educ 51 (Suppl 2), 757–782 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9824-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9824-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation