Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 48, Issue 6, pp 1107–1113 | Cite as

Towards an Understanding of Epistemic Insight: the Nature of Science in Real World Contexts and a Multidisciplinary Arena. [Editorial]

  • Berry Billingsley
  • Sharon FraserEmail author
Article
  • 138 Downloads
Our understanding of the nature of knowledge both within science and across disciplines continues to be of interest to the academic community. Research into the nature of science is plentiful, particularly in relation to views held by students (e.g. Deng et al. 2011) even though universal agreement amongst scholars about the nature of science has yet or may never be achieved (Lederman 2007). While scholars may not agree on every detail regarding the specifics of the nature of science, science educators use the phrase to:

describe the intersection of issues addressed by the philosophy, history, sociology, and psychology of science as they apply to and potentially impact science teaching and learning. As such, the nature of science is a fundamental domain for guiding science educators in accurately portraying science to students (McComas et al. 1998, p.5).

Science teachers, therefore, are required to understand how science knowledge is created and how to engage their learners...

Keywords

Epistemic insight Teacher knowledge Multidisciplinary perspectives Big questions Nature of science 

References

  1. Alexander, D. (2008). Creation or evolution: do we have to choose? Oxford: Monarch.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research and Critique. Revised Edition. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Billingsley, B., Taber, K. S., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2013). Secondary school students’ epistemic insight into the relationships between science and religion—a preliminary enquiry. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1715–1732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Deng, F., Chen, D.-T., Tsai, C.-C., & Tsai, C. S. (2011). Students’ views of the nature of science: a critical review of research. Science Education, 95, 961–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Department of Children, Schools and Families (DCSF) (2007). Guidance on creationism and intelligent design. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20071204131026/http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/docbank/index.cfm?id=11890.
  6. Erduran, S., & Dagher, Z. (2014). Reconceptualizing the nature of science for science education: Scientific knowledge, practices and other family categories. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Funk, G. (2017). Real numbers: mixed messages about public trust in science. Issues in Science and Technology, 34(1) Retrieved from: http://issues.org/34-1/real-numbers-mixed-messages-about-public-trust-in-science/.
  8. Havighurst, R. J. (1952). Human development and education . New York: Longmans, Green.
  9. Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In Abell, S.K. and Lederman, N.G. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education p. 831–880. New Jersey, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Antink, A. (2013). Nature of science and scientific inquiry as context for the learning of science and achievement of scientific literacy. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(3), 138–147.Google Scholar
  11. McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies, 3–39. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Office of the Chief Scientist (2012). Mathematics, engineering and science in the national interest. Canberra: Author. Retrieved from https://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/Office-of-the-Chief-Scientist-MES-Report-8-May-2012.pdf
  13. Reiss, M. J. (2012). What should be the role of religion in science education and bioethics? In S. A. Øyen, T. Lund-Olsen, & N. S. Vaage (Eds.), Sacred science? On science and its interrelations with religious worldviews (pp. 127–139). Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Scheufele, D. A., Corley, E. A., Shih, T.-j., Dalrymple, K. E., & Ho, S. S. (2008). Religious beliefs and public attitudes toward nanotechnology in Europe and the United States. Nature Nanotechnology, 4, 91–94.  https://doi.org/10.1038/NNANO.2008.361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011). Secondary students’ responses to perceptions of the relationship between science and religion: stances identified from an interview study. Science Education, 95, 1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of Christ Church CanterburyCanterburyUK
  2. 2.Faculty of EducationUniversity of TasmaniaLauncestonAustralia

Personalised recommendations