Student Agency in Negotiating the Relationship Between Science and Religion
Research examining the relationship between science and religion has often painted a narrative of conflict for students with various religious beliefs. The purpose of this paper is to present a counter-narrative based on a study carried out in Singapore, which provides a unique multi-ethnic and multi-religious environment and geopolitical context to study the phenomenon. Informed by the theories of collateral learning, situated cognition and agency, the study examined how a group of high school biology students viewed and negotiated the relationship between biological evolution and their beliefs in Christianity. Case study methodology and semi-structured interviews were used to generate thick descriptions of their views. Findings from the study illustrate how the students exhibited agency in deliberately creating multiple resolution mechanisms as they recognised and negotiated the conceptual and social tensions between the worldviews of evolution and creationism. The findings suggest that the students exhibited more agency in resolving the perceived conflict between science and religion than we tend to ascribe based on previous interpretative accounts that emphasised confrontation, alienation and marginalisation. The implication is that students’ agency in negotiating the differing worldviews between science and religion should be seen as a resource for the learning of evolution, rather than a hindrance.
KeywordsAgency Religion Evolution Multi-culturalism
We wish to express our gratitude to the students and teachers who participated in this study as well as Aik-Ling Tan and Yew-Jin Lee for their useful comments on an earlier version of this paper. The views expressed in this paper are the authors’ and do not represent the views of their affiliations.
- Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
- Bell, B. (1995). Interviewing: a technique for assessing science knowledge. Learning science in the schools: research reforming practice, 347–364.Google Scholar
- Clancey, W. J. (1997). Situated cognition: on human knowledge and computer representations. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
- Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 420–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Denzin, N. K. (2002). Interpretive interactionism (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Department of Statistics. (2010). Census of population 2010. Singapore Retrieved from http://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/publications-and-papers/cop2010/census10_stat_release1.
- Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (p. 1071). New York: Macmillan Library Reference USA.Google Scholar
- Heron, A. H. (2003). A study of agency: multiple constructions of choice and decision-making in an inquiry-based summer school program for struggling school readers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 46(7), 568–579.Google Scholar
- Hinchman, K. A., Alvermann, D. E., Boyd, F. B., Brozo, W. G., & Vacca, R. T. (2004). Supporting older students’ in- and out-of-school literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 47, 304–310.Google Scholar
- Holland, D., Lachicotte, W., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Hung, D., Looi, C.-K., & Koh, T.-S. (2004). Situated cognition and communities of practice: first-person ‘lived experiences’ vs. third-person perspectives. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 193–200.Google Scholar
- Lee, H. (2006). How to stay an oasis in a troubled world. The Straits Times.Google Scholar
- McCrory, C., & Murphy, C. (2009). The growing visibility of creationism in Northern Ireland: are new science teachers equipped to deal with the issues? Evolution: Education and Outreach, 2(3), 372–385.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Education. (2015). Biology GCE ordinary level 2017 (Syllabus 5158) Retrieved from http://www.seab.gov.sg/content/syllabus/olevel/2017Syllabus/5158_2017.pdf.
- Ministry of Education. (2016). Biology syllabus pre-university higher 2 syllabus 9744. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/docs/default-source/document/education/syllabuses/sciences/files/pre-university-h2-biology---2016.pdf.
- Moje, E. B., & Lewis, C. (2007). Examining opportunities to learn literacy: the role of critical sociocultural literacy research. In E. B. Moje, C. Lewis, & P. Enciso (Eds.), Reframing sociocultural research on literacy; identity, agency, and power (pp. 15–48). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Moore, R. (2007). The history of the creationism/evolution controversy and likely future developments. In L. Jones & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Teaching about scientific origins: taking account of creationism (pp. 11–29). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: critical reflections: London: The Nuffield Foundation. Vol. 13.Google Scholar
- Pazza, R., Penteado, P. R., & Kavalco, K. F. (2010). Misconceptions about evolution in Brazilian freshmen students. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 3(1), 107–113.Google Scholar
- Perry, K. (2007). Sharing stories, linking lives: literacy practices among Sudanese refugees. I. In V. Purcell-Gates (Ed.), Cultural practices of literacy: case studies of language, literacy, social practice, and power (pp. 169–178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..Google Scholar
- Popper, K. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rappa, N. A., & Tang, K. S. (2017). Student agency: An analysis of students’ networked relations across the informal and formal learning domains. Research in Science Education, 47(3), 673–684.Google Scholar
- Reiss, M. J. (2008). Creationism, Darwinism and ID: what are biology teachers supposed to do? Biologist, 55, 28–32.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research Newbury Park, CA: Sage. (Vol. 15).Google Scholar
- Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing science education: constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science Springer Science & Business Media. Vol. 37.Google Scholar
- Tang, K. S. (2011). Hybridizing cultural understandings of the natural world to foster critical science literacy. (Doctoral dissertation), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database (UMI No. 3476796).Google Scholar
- Wallace, C. S. (2004). Framing new research in science literacy and language use: authenticity, multiple discourses, and the Third Space. Science Education, 88(6).Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: design and methods (5th ed.). Washington D.C.: Sage.Google Scholar