Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 49, Issue 5, pp 1213–1229 | Cite as

Grade Level Differences in High School Students’ Conceptions of and Motives for Learning Science

  • Ya-Ling WangEmail author
  • Chin-Chung TsaiEmail author
Article

Abstract

Students’ conceptions of learning science and their relations with motive for learning may vary as the education level increases. This study aimed to compare the quantitative patterns in students’ conceptions of learning science (COLS) and motives for learning science (MLS) across grade levels by adopting two survey instruments. A total of 768 high school students were surveyed in Taiwan, including 204 eighth graders, 262 tenth graders, and 302 12th graders. In the current research, memorizing, testing, and calculating and practicing were categorized as reproductive conceptions of learning science, while increase of knowledge, applying, understanding and seeing-in-a-new-way were regarded as constructivist conceptions. The results of multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) revealed that conceptions of learning science are more constructivist as education level increases. Both tenth graders and 12th graders endorsed understanding, seeing-in-a-new-way, and the constructivist COLS composite more strongly than the eighth graders did. In addition, the results of multigroup structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis indicated that the positive relations between testing and reproductive COLS were stronger as the grade level increased, while the negative relations between reproductive COLS and deep motive were tighter with the increase in grade level.

Keywords

Conceptions of learning science Motives for learning science Grade level differences 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper is supported by Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under grant number MOST 103-2511-S-011-003-MY3.

References

  1. Amrein, A. L., & Berliner, D. C. (2003). The effects of high-stakes testing on student motivation and learning. Educational Leadership, 60(5), 32–38 Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000180735100007.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1996). Reform by the book: what is—or might be—the role of curriculum materials in teacher learning and instructional reform. Educational Researcher, 25(9), 6–8 14.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos: basic concepts, applications, and programming. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  5. Chin, C., & Brown, D. E. (2000). Learning in science: a comparison of deep and surface approaches. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(2), 109–138. doi: 10.1002/(Sici)1098-2736(200002)37:2<109::Aid-Tea3>3.0.Co;2-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dart, B. C., Burnett, P. C., Purdie, N., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campbell, J., & Smith, D. (2000). Students’ conceptions of learning, the classroom environment, and approaches to learning. Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 262–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965pli1104_01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Donche, V., Coertjens, L., & Van Petegem, P. (2010). Learning pattern development throughout higher education: a longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 256–259. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guvercin, O., Tekkaya, C., Sungur, S. (2010). A cross age study of elementary students’ motivation towards science learning. Hacettepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi-Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 39, 233–243.Google Scholar
  10. Hargrove, T. Y., Jones, M. G., Jones, B. D., Hardin, B., Chapman, L., & Davis, M. (2000). Unintended consequences of high-stakes testing in North Carolina: teacher perceptions. ERS Spectrum, 18(4), 21–25.Google Scholar
  11. Kember, D., Biggs, J., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2004). Examining the multidimensionality of approaches to learning through the development of a revised version of the Learning Process Questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 261–279. doi: 10.1348/000709904773839879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lee, M.-H., Johanson, R. E., & Tsai, C.-C. (2008). Exploring Taiwanese high school students’ conceptions of and approaches to learning science through a structural equation modeling analysis. Science Education, 92(2), 191–220. doi: 10.1002/sce.20245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lepper, M. R., Corpus, J. H., & Iyengar, S. S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liang, J.-C., & Tsai, C.-C. (2010). Relational analysis of college science-major students’ epistemological beliefs toward science and conceptions of learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(17), 2273–2289. doi: 10.1080/09500690903397796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin, C. L., Tsai, C. C., & Liang, J. C. (2012). An investigation of two profiles within conceptions of learning science: an examination of confirmatory factor analysis. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27(4), 499–521. doi: 10.1007/s10212-011-0092-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lin, T. J., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Identifying Taiwanese university students’ physics learning profiles and their role in physics learning self-efficacy. Research in Science Education, 45(4), 605–624. doi: 10.1007/s11165-014-9440-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Marton, F., Dall’Alba, G., & Beaty, E. (1993). Conceptions of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(3), 277–299.Google Scholar
  18. McNeill, K. L., Pimentel, D. S., & Strauss, E. G. (2013). The impact of high school science teachers’ beliefs, curricular enactments and experience on student learning during an inquiry-based urban ecology curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 35(15), 2608–2644. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.618193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 results (volume II): policies and practices for successful schools. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264267510-en.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Puntambekar, S., Stylianou, A., & Goldstein, J. (2007). Comparing classroom enactments of an inquiry curriculum: lessons learned from two teachers. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 81–130. doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls1601_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roth, W. M., & Bowen, G. M. (1995). Knowing and interacting: a study of culture, practices, and resources in a grade 8 open-inquiry science classroom guided by a cognitive apprenticeship metaphor. Cognition and Instruction, 13(1), 73–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Säljö, R. (1979). Learning in the learner’s perspective, 1: some commonsense conceptions. Cothenburg: Sweden Institute of Education, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  23. Säljö, R. (1987). The edrucational construction of learning. In J. T. E. Richardson, M. W. Eysenk, & D. W. Piper (Eds.), Student learning: Research in education and cognitive psychology (pp. 101–108). Milton Keynes: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Säljö, R. (1991). Introduction: culture and learning. Learning and Instruction, 1(3), 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Senler, B., & Sungur, S. (2009). Parental influences on students’ self-concept, task value beliefs, and achievement in science. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 12(1), 106–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sheldon, K. M., & Biddle, B. J. (1998). Standards, accountability, and school reform: perils and pitfalls. Teachers College Record, 100(1), 164–180 Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000076699300010.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, M. L., & Rottenberg, C. (1991). Unintended consequences of external testing in elementary schools. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 10(4), 7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tsai, C.-C. (1999). “Laboratory exercises help me memorize the scientific truths”: a study of eighth graders’ scientific epistemological views and learning in laboratory activities. Science Education, 83(6), 654–674. doi: 10.1002/(Sici)1098-237x(199911)83:6<654::Aid-Sce2>3.0.Co;2-Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tsai, C.-C. (2003). Taiwanese science students’ and teachers’ perceptions of the laboratory learning environments: exploring epistemological gaps. International Journal of Science Education, 25(7), 847–860. doi: 10.1080/0950069032000052054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsai, C.-C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: a phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1733–1750. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000230776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tsai, C. C., & Kuo, P. C. (2008). Cram school students’ conceptions of learning and learning science in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 30(3), 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Urdan, T., & Midgley, C. (2003). Changes in the perceived classroom goal structure and pattern of adaptive learning during early adolescence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28(4), 524–551. doi: 10.1016/S0361-476x(02)00060-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Bragt, C. A. C., Bakx, A. W. E. A., Van der Sanden, J. M. M., & Croon, M. A. (2007). Students’ approaches to learning when entering higher education: differences between students with senior general secondary and senior secondary educational backgrounds. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(1), 83–96. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Vîrban, P. S. (2014). Gender and educational level differences in the conceptions of learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 812–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2012). An exploration of elementary school students’ conceptions of learning: a drawing analysis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(3), 610–617.Google Scholar
  36. Wong, R. M. H. (2014). Motivation to learn English and school grade level: the case of newly arrived Hong Kong students. Porta Linguarum, 21, 37–50.Google Scholar
  37. Yager, R. E., Choi, A., Yager, S. O., & Akcay, H. (2009). Comparing science learning among 4th-, 5th-, and 6th-grade students: STS versus textbook-based instruction. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Adult and Continuing EducationNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Program of Learning Sciences, National Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations