‘You Actually Feel like You’re Actually Doing Some Science’: Primary Students’ Perspectives of Their Involvement in the MyScience Initiative
MyScience is a primary science education initiative in which being in a community of practice (CoP) is integral to the learning process. Stakeholder groups—primary teachers, primary students and scientist mentors—interact around the CoP domainof investigating scientifically and learn from each other through participation. This paper is the fifth in a series and reports 27 year 5/6 students’ (from three schools) perceptions of how their views were influenced through their involvement in a MyScience CoP. Semi-structured interviews, guided by a phenomenographic framework, were the substantive data source. Primary students’ perceptions about science, science learning and science teaching were analysed using attributes associated with both communities of practice and the nature of science. Findings reveal that students’ perceptions of what it means to be doing science’ were transformed through their participation and students were able to identify some of the contributing factors. Where appropriate, students’ views were compared with the published views of their participating scientist mentors and teachers from earlier papers. Implications for science teaching and learning in primary school community of practice settings are discussed.
KeywordsCommunity of practice Primary/elementary school Primary/elementary student Nature of science
- ACARA (2016). National science curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/science/curriculum/f-10?layout=1
- Aikenhead, G.S. (1996). Science Education: Border Crossing into the Subculture of Science. Studies in Science Education 27(1), 1-52.Google Scholar
- Anfara, V., Brown, K., & Mangione, T. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28–38. doi: 10.3102/0013189X031007028.
- ASTA: Australian Science Teachers’ Association (2014). Primary school science teaching survey report June 2014. Retrieved from <asta.edu.au/generic/file-widget/download/id/693>.
- Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Borg, T. (2009). The tenacity of teachers: the evolution of a teacher community of practice. Bathurst: Unpublished doctoral thesis. Charles Sturt University, Australia.Google Scholar
- Connor, R. (2007). NSW science and technology K–6 literature review. Retrieved from http://educonv.com/docs/23948/index-4214.html.
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2008). Strategies of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching: a project of the American Educational Research Association (3rd ed., pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Fensham, P. (2008). Science education policy-making: eleven emerging issues: UNESCO. Retrieved December 10, 2013 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001567/156700e.pdf.
- Fitzgerald, A., & Schneider, K. (2013). What teachers want: supporting primary school teachers in teaching science. Teaching Science, 59(2), 7–10.Google Scholar
- Forbes, A., & McCloughan, G. (2010). Increasing student participation in science investigations in primary schools: the MyScience initiative. Teaching Science, 56(2), 24–30.Google Scholar
- Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
- Hackling, M. (2005). Working scientifically: implementing and assessing in science. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.Google Scholar
- Harlen, W. (2008). Science as a key component of the primary curriculum: a rationale with policy implications. Perspectives on Education 1 (Primary Science), pp. 4–18. Retrieved from www.wellcome.ac.uk/perspectives
- Harlen, W. (Ed.). (2011). ASE guide to primary science education. Association for Science Education: Hatfield, Herts.Google Scholar
- Hodson, D. (2014). Learning Science, Learning about Science, Doing Science: Different goals demand different learning methods. International Journal of Science Education, 36(15), 2534-2553.Google Scholar
- Howitt, C., Rennie, L., Heard, M., & Yuncken, L. (2009). The scientists in schools project. Teaching Science, 55(1), 35–38.Google Scholar
- Lederman, N., & Lederman, J. (2014). Research on teaching and learning of the nature of science. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education, volume 2 (pp. 600–620). Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
- Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
- Logan, M., & Skamp, K. (2008). Engaging students in science across the primary secondary interface: Listening to the students’ voice. Research in Science Education, 38(4), 501–527. doi:10.1007/s11165-007-9063-8.
- Morgan, A. (2012). Teaching science in the primary school: surveying teacher wellbeing and planning for survival. Teaching Science, 58(3), 14–21.Google Scholar
- Murphy, C., Varley, J., & Veale, O. (2012). I’d rather they did experiments with us…. than just talking: Irish children’s views of primary school science. Research in Science Education, 42(3), 415–438. doi:10.1007/s11165-010-9204-3.
- NAPLAN: National Assessment Program—Literacy and Numeracy (2013). Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au.
- Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Rennie, L. J. (2012). ‘A very valuable partnership’. Evaluation of the Scientists in Schools Project 2011–2012. Dickson: CSIRO Education. Retrieved from www.scientistsinschools.edu.au/downloads/SiSEvaluationReport2011-2012.pdf.
- Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture and Activity, 1(4), 209–229.Google Scholar
- Roth, K. (2014). Elementary science teaching. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 361–394). Routledge: New York.Google Scholar
- Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. K. S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 31–56). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Skamp, K. (2007). Conceptual learning in the primary and middle years: the interplay of heads, hearts and hands-on science. Teaching Science, 53(3), 18–22.Google Scholar
- Skamp, K., & Preston, C. (Eds.). (2015). Teaching primary science constructively (5th ed.). Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.Google Scholar
- Stringer, E. (2015). Action research (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: engaging students in science for Australia's future. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved from www.acer.edu.au/documents/AER51_ReimaginingSciEdu.pdf.
- Tytler, R. (2014). Attitudes, identity and aspirations towards science. In N. Lederman & S. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 82–103). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience (2nd ed.). London, Ontario: The Althouse Press.Google Scholar
- Wenger-Trayner, E. (2013). What is a community of practice? Retrieved from http://wenger-trayner.com/resources/what-is-a-community-of-practice/
- Yates, C., Partridge, H. L., & Bruce, C. S. (2012). Exploring information experiences through phenomenography. Library and Information Research, 36(112), 96–119.Google Scholar
- Zoller, U. & Nahum, T. (2012). From teaching to KNOW to learning to THINK in science education. In B.J. Fraser et al. (eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education. Springer, 209-229. doi: 10.1007%2F978-1-4020-9041-7_16.Google Scholar