Research in Science Education

, Volume 48, Issue 3, pp 515–532 | Cite as

Assessment of Understanding: Student Teachers’ Preparation, Implementation and Reflection of a Lesson Plan for Science

Article
First Online:
  • 162 Downloads

Abstract

Research finds that student teachers often fail to make observable instructional goals, without which a secure bridge between instruction and assessment is precluded. This is one reason that recent reports state that teacher education needs to become better at helping student teachers to develop their thinking about and skills in assessing pupils’ learning. Currently in Europe, the Lesson Study method and the Content Representation tool, which both have a specific focus on assessment, have started to address this problem. This article describes and discusses an intervention in which Lesson Study was used in combination with Content Representation in student teachers’ field practice. Empirical materials from one group of student teachers were analyzed to illustrate how the student teachers worked with assessment during the planning of a lesson, how they implemented it in a research lesson, and how they used the gathered observations to make claims about assessment aims. The findings suggest that the student teachers placed greater emphasis on assessment through the intervention. However, it is also found that more attention should have been dedicated to the planning phase and that the group did not manage to keep a research focus throughout the Lesson Study process. This suggests that it properly would be beneficial with several planning sessions prior to the research lesson, as well as having an expert teacher leading the Lesson Study.

Keywords

Assessment Lesson Study Content Representation Teacher education Science Field practice 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Black, P., & Harrison, C. (2006). Science inside the black box. London: Granada Learning Limited.Google Scholar
  2. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boeije, H. R. (2009). Analysis in qualitative research. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  4. Bradbury, L. U., & Koballa, T. R. (2007). Mentor advice giving in an alternative certification program for secondary science teaching: opportunities and roadblocks in developing a knowledge base for teaching. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(6), 817–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bransford, J., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.) (2004). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  6. Campbell, C., & Evans, J. A. (2000). Investigation of preservice teachers’ classroom assessment practices during student teaching. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(6), 350–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cerbin, W., & Kopp, B. (2006). Lesson study as a model for building pedagogical knowledge and improving teaching. International Journal of Teaching & Learning, 18(3), 250–257.Google Scholar
  8. Chaona, S., & Inprasitha, N. (2013). Teacher’s assessment for students’ learning in classroom using lesson study and open approach. Psychology, 4(12), 1069–1072.Google Scholar
  9. DeLuca, C., & Bellara, A. (2013). The current state of assessment education aligning policy, standards, and teacher education curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(4), 356–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Doig, B., Groves, S., & Fujii, T. (2011). The critical role of task development in lesson study. In L. C. Hart, A. S. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 181–199). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dudley, P. (2013). Teacher learning in lesson study: what interaction-level discourse analysis revealed about how teachers utilised imagination, tacit knowledge of teaching and fresh evidence of pupils learning, to develop practice knowledge and so enhance their pupils’ learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 34, 107–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: a Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Fernandez, C., Cannon, J., & Chokshi, S. (2003). A US–Japan lesson study collaboration reveals critical lenses for examining practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 171–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Greenberg, J., & Walsh, K. (2012) What teacher preparation programs teach about K-12 assessment: a review. National Council on Teacher Quality.Google Scholar
  16. Heritage, M., Kim, J., Vendlinski, T., & Herman, J. (2009). From evidence to action: a seamless process in formative assessment? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 28(3), 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hume, A. (2011). Using collaborative CoRe design in chemistry education to promote effective partnerships between associate and student teachers. Chemistry Education in New Zealand, 125, 13–19.Google Scholar
  18. Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2013). Enhancing the practicum experience for pre-service chemistry teachers through collaborative CoRe design with mentor teachers. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 2107–2136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hume, A., & Coll, R. (2009). Assessment of learning, for learning, and as learning. Assessment in Education, 16(3), 269–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Juhler, M. (2016). The use of lesson study combined with content representation in the planning of physics lessons during field practice to develop pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 27(5), 533–553.Google Scholar
  21. Juhler, M., & Håland, B. (2016). The impact of lesson study and content representation on student teachers’ science teaching. In B. Hallås & G. Grimsæth (Eds.), Lesson Study i en nordisk kontekst (pp. 195–213). Gyldendal Akademisk.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis, C. (2002). A handbook of teacher-led instructional change. Philadelphia, PA: Research for Better Schools.Google Scholar
  23. Lewis, C., & Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson study step by step: how teacher learning communities improve instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  24. Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1999). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: how research lessons improve Japanese education. Improving Schools, 2(1), 48–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2012). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (2nd ed.). Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Meyer, H. (2004). Novice and expert teachers’ conceptions of learners’ prior knowledge. Science Education, 88(6), 970–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ministry of Education. (2010). National curriculum regulation for teacher education. Oslo.Google Scholar
  28. Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (Eds.) (2004). Assessing science understanding: a human constructivist view. Burlington, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  29. Morris, A. K. (2006). Assessing pre-service teachers’ skills for analyzing teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(5), 471–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mulhall, P., Berry, A., & Loughran, J. (2003). Frameworks for representing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 4(2), 1–25.Google Scholar
  31. Munthe, E., Helgevold, N., & Bjuland, R. (2015). Lesson study i utdanning og praksis. Oslo: Cappelen Damm.Google Scholar
  32. Murata, A. (2011). Introduction: conceptual overview of lesson study. In L. C. Hart, A. S. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 1–12). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  33. Nilsson, P. (2011). Uppleva, erfara och lära: Ett projekt om lärarstudenters utveckling av ämnesdidaktisk kunskap genom reflektion av undervisning. Kristianstad: Högskolan.Google Scholar
  34. Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2011). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 669–721.Google Scholar
  35. NVivo, [Computer Software]. (2014). (Version 10). Doncaster, AU: QSR.Google Scholar
  36. Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: critical reflections. London: King’s Collage.Google Scholar
  37. Radnor, H. A. (1994). The problems of facilitating qualitative formative assessment in pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 64(1), 145–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Furtak, E. M. (2007). Exploring teachers’ informal formative assessment practices and students’ understanding in the context of scientific inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(1), 57–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Scherer, M. (2007). Perspectives/an answer for the long term. Educational Leadership, 65 (4), 7.Google Scholar
  40. Schneider, R., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teachers learning progressions: a review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  43. Utdanningsdirektoratet (2010). Rundskriv Udir - 1 - 2010 - Individuell vurdering i grunnskolen og videregående opplæring etter forskrift til opplæringsloven kapittel 3. Oslo: Utdanningsdirektoratet.Google Scholar
  44. Utdanningsdirektoratet (2011). Nasjonal satsing på vurdering for læring (2010–2014). Oslo: Utdanningsdirektoratet.Google Scholar
  45. Weiland, I., Akerson, V. L., Rogers, M. P., & Pongsanon, K. (2010). Lesson study as a tool for engaging preservice teachers in reflective practice. Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  46. Yoshida, M., & Jackson, C. W. (2011). Ideas for developing mathematical pedagogical content knowledge through lesson study. In L. C. Hart, A. S. Alston, & A. Murata (Eds.), Lesson study research and practice in mathematics education (pp. 279–288). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of StavangerStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations