Research in Science Education

, Volume 47, Issue 3, pp 473–496 | Cite as

Using Mobile Devices to Connect Teachers and Museum Educators

  • Ibrahim DelenEmail author
  • Joseph Krajcik


The use of mobile devices is increasing rapidly as a potential tool for science teaching. In this study, five educators (three middle school teachers and two museum educators) used a mobile application that supported the development of a driving question. Previous studies have noted that teachers make little effort to connect learning experiences between classrooms and museums, and few studies have focused on creating connections between teachers and museum educators. In this study, teachers and museum educators created an investigation together by designing a driving question in conjunction with the research group before field trips. During field trips, students collected their own data using iPods or iPads to take pictures or record videos of the exhibits. When students returned to the school, they used the museum data with their peers as they tried to answer the driving question. After completing the field trips, five educators were interviewed to investigate their experiences with designing driving questions and using mobile devices. Besides supporting students in data collection during the field trip, using mobile devices helped teachers to get the museum back to the classroom. Designing the driving question supported museum educators and teachers to plan the field trip collaboratively.


Field trips Mobile application Teachers Museum educators Science education 



We thank Dr. Tali Tal for providing valuable comments when writing the paper; and Dr. Kongju Mun, Dr. Steven McGee, Myunghwan Shin, and Jennifer Duck for their help in the coding process. This work was supported by NSF Grant DRL 1020027.


  1. Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2002). Nature-based excursions: school students’ perceptions of learning in natural environments. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 11(3), 218–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton, A. C., & Osborne, M. D. (2001). Urban girls participation in informal science settings: playing with identities and borders. Curriculum and Teaching, 16(2), 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39(4), 395–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A., & Feder, M. (Eds.). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: people, places and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bielaczyc, K. (2006). Designing social infrastructure: critical issues in creating learning environments with technology. Journal of Learning Sciences, 15, 301–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B. J., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149–164.Google Scholar
  7. Cabrera, J. S., Frutos, H. M., Adrian, G. S., Avouris, N., Dimitriadis, Y., Fiotakis, G., & Liveri, K. D. (2005). Mystery in the museum: collaborative learning activities using handheld devices. In Tscheligi, M., Bernhaupt, R. & Mihalic, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services (pp. 315-318). Salzburg, Austria.Google Scholar
  8. Cahill, C., Kuhn, A., Schmoll, S., Lo, W. T., McNally, B., & Quintana, C. (2011). Mobile learning in museums: how mobile supports for learning influence student behavior. In Moher, T., Quintana, C. & Price, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 21-28). Ann Arbor, USA.Google Scholar
  9. Creswell, J. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Delen, I. (2014). Supporting Students’ Scientific Explanations: A Case Study Investigating The Synergy Focusing On A Teacher’s Practices When Providing Instruction And Using Mobile Devices (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA.Google Scholar
  11. Dillon, J., Rickinson, M., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Young Choi, M.-Y., Sanders, D., et al. (2006). The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere. School Science Review, 87, 107–111.Google Scholar
  12. Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira.Google Scholar
  13. Fido, S. H., & Gayford, G. C. (1982). Field work and the biology teacher: a survey in secondary schools in England and Wales. Journal of Biology Education, 16, 27–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fraser, D.S., Smith, H., Tallyn, E., Kirk, D., Benford, S.,Rowland, D., Paxton, M., Price, S. & Fitzpatrick, G. (2005). The SENSE Project: A Context-Inclusive Approach to Studying Environmental Science within and across Schools. In Koschmann, T., Suthers, D., Chan, T.W. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (pp.155–159). Taipei, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  15. Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. The Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. Public Schools: Fall 2008 (NCES 2010-034). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  17. Griffin, J. (1998). Learning science through practical experiences in museums. International Journal of Science Education, 20(6), 655–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Griffin, J., & Symington, D. (1997). Moving from task-oriented to learning oriented strategies on school excursions to museums. Science Education, 81, 763–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glesne, C. (2011). Becoming qualitative researchers: an introduction (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.Google Scholar
  20. Gupta, P., Adams, J., Kisiel, J., & Dewitt, J. (2010). Examining the complexities of school-museum partnerships. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(3), 685–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hsi, S. (2003). A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 308–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kisiel, J. (2005). Understanding elementary teacher motivations for science field trips. Science Education, 89(6), 936–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kisiel, J. F. (2006a). More than lions and tigers and bears: creating meaningful field trip lessons. Science Activities, 43(2), 7–10.Google Scholar
  24. Kisiel, J. (2006b). Making field trips work. Science Teacher, 73(1), 46–48.Google Scholar
  25. Kisiel, J. (2010). Exploring a school-aquarium collaboration: an intersection of communities of practice. Science Education, 94, 95–121.Google Scholar
  26. Kisiel, J. F. (2014). Clarifying the complexities of school–museum interactions: perspectives from two communities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 342–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klopfer, E., Yoon, S., & Perry, J. (2005). Using palm technology in participatory simulations of complex systems: a new take on ubiquitous and accessible mobile computing. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 285–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model forhelping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The elementary school journal, 94, 483–497.Google Scholar
  29. Krajcik, J. S., & Starr, M. (2001). Learning science content in a project-based environment.In Tinker, R. F. & Krajcik, J. S. (Eds.) (2001). Portable Technologies: Science Learning in Context (pp. 103–119).  Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Maldonado, H., & Pea, R. D. (2010). LET’s GO! to the Creek: Co-design of water quality inquiry using mobile science collaboratories. In Hoppe, U., Pea, R. & Liu., C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International IEEE Conference on Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technologies in Education (WMUTE 2010) (pp. 81–87). Kaohsiung, Taiwan.Google Scholar
  31. McKenzie, G., Utgard, R., & Lisowski, M. (1986). The importance of field trip, a geological example. Journal of College Science Teaching, 16, 17–20.Google Scholar
  32. Mirka, G. D. (1970). Factors which influence elementary teachers use of out-of-doors? (unpublished master’s thesis). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
  33. Morag, O., & Tal, T. (2012). Assessing learning in the outdoors with the field trip in natural environments (FiNE) framework. International Journal of Science Education, 34(5), 745–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Orion, N. (1993). A model for the development and implementation of field trips as an integral part of the science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 93, 325–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Quintana, C. (2012). Pervasive science: using mobile devices and the cloud to support science education. Interactions, 19(4), 76–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rennie, L. J. (2007). Learning science outside of school. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 125–167). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  37. Rogers, Y., Price, S., Fitzpatrick, G., Fleck, R., Harris, E., Smith, H., Randell, C., Weal, M. (2004). Ambient wood: Designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors. In Druin, A., Hourcade, J. P., Kollet, S. (Eds.), Proceedings of 2004 conference on Interaction design and children: building a community (pp. 3-10). Maryland, USA.Google Scholar
  38. Russell, M., Bebell, D., O’Dwyer, L., & O’Connor, K. (2003). Examining teacher technology use implications for preservice and inservice teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 54(4), 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Singer, J., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J., & Clay Chambers, J. (2000). Constructing extended inquiry projects: Curriculum materials for science education reform. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 165–178.Google Scholar
  40. Stainfield, J., Fisher, P., Ford, B., & Solem, M. (2000). International virtual field trips: a new direction? Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 24(2), 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sung, Y., Hou, H., Liu, C., & Chang, K. (2010). Mobile guide system using problem-solving strategy for museum learning: a sequential learning behavioural pattern analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(2), 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Tal, R., Bamberger, Y., & Morag, O. (2005). Guided school visits to natural history museums in Israel: teachers’ roles. Science Education, 89(6), 920–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tal, T., & Steiner, L. (2006). Patterns of teacher museum staff relationships: school visits to the educational centre of a science museum. Canadian Journal of Math, Science & Technology Education, 6(1), 25–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tran, L. U. (2007). Teaching science in museums: the pedagogy and goals of museum educators. Science Education, 91, 278–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vavoula, G., Sharples, M., Rudman, P., Meek, J., & Lonsdale, P. (2009). Myartspace: design and evaluation of support for learning with multimedia phones between classrooms and museums. Computers & Education, 53(2), 286–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zhang, M., & Quintana, C. (2012). Scaffolding strategies for supporting middle school students’ online inquiry processes. Computers & Education, 58(1), 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Education, Usak UniversityUsakTurkey
  2. 2.College of Education, Michigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA

Personalised recommendations