Research in Science Education

, Volume 47, Issue 2, pp 257–281 | Cite as

Primary School Teachers’ Understanding of Science Process Skills in Relation to Their Teaching Qualifications and Teaching Experience

  • Edy H. M. Shahali
  • Lilia Halim
  • David F. Treagust
  • Mihye Won
  • A. L. Chandrasegaran
Article

Abstract

This study investigated the understanding of science process skills (SPS) of 329 science teachers from 52 primary schools selected by random sampling. The understanding of SPS was measured in terms of conceptual and operational aspects of SPS using an instrument called the Science Process Skills Questionnaire (SPSQ) with a Cronbach’s alpha reliability of 0.88. The findings showed that the teachers’ conceptual understanding of SPS was much weaker than their practical application of SPS. The teachers’ understanding of SPS differed by their teaching qualifications but not so much by their teaching experience. Emphasis needs to be given to both conceptual and operational understanding of SPS during pre-service and in-service teacher education to enable science teachers to use the skills and implement inquiry-based lessons in schools.

Keywords

Science process skills Primary school science Primary science teachers 

References

  1. ACARA. (2012). Australian curriculum: science. Sydney: Australian Curriculum, Assessment, and Reporting Authority.Google Scholar
  2. Aiello-Nicosia, M. L., Sperandeo, R. M., & Valenza, M. A. (1984). The relationship between science process abilities of teachers and science achievement of students: an experimental study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(8), 853–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: what research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bati, K., Erturk, G., & Kaptan, F. (2010). The awareness level of pre-school education teachers regarding science process skill. Innovation and Creativity in Education, 2(2), 1993–1999.Google Scholar
  5. Britner, S. L., & Finson, K. D. (2005). Preservice teachers’ reflections on their growth in an inquiry oriented science pedagogy course. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 17(1), 39–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brotherton, P. W., & Preece, P. F. W. (1996). Teaching science process skills. International Journal of Science Education, 18(1), 65–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Colvill, M., & Pattie, I. (2002). Science skills—the building blocks for scientific literacy. Investigating: Australian Primary and Junior Science Journal, 18(3), 20–22.Google Scholar
  9. Downing, J.E., Filer, J.D., & Chamberlain, R.A., (1997). Science process skills and attitudes of preservice elementary teachers. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Mid-South Educational Research Association, Memphis, TN. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED416191).Google Scholar
  10. Ebru, M., & Deniz, S. (2010). Pre-service science teachers’ competence to design an inquiry based laboratory lesson. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 4255–4259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emereole, H. U. (2009). Learners’ and teachers’ conceptual knowledge of science process: the case of Botswana. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 1033–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farsakoglu, O. F., Sahin, C., Karsli, F., Akpinar, M., & Ultay, N. (2008). A study on awareness levels of prospective science teachers on science process skills in science education. World Applied Sciences Journal, 4, 174–182.Google Scholar
  13. Gillies, R. M., & Nichols, K. (2014). How to support primary teachers’ implementation of inquiry: teachers’ reflections on teaching cooperative inquiry-based science. Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-014-9418-x.Google Scholar
  14. Gyllenpalm, J., Wickman, P., & Holmgren, S. (2010). Teachers’ language on scientific inquiry: methods of teaching or method of inquiry? International Journal of Science Education, 32(9), 1151–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harlen, W. (1999). Purpose and procedures for assessing science process skills. Assessment in Education: principles, policy & practice, 6(1), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88(1), 28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karsli, F., Sahin, C., & Ayas, A. (2009). Determining science teachers’ ideas about the science process skills: a case study. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 1, 890–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kenny, J. D. (2012). University-school partnerships: pre-service and in-service teachers working together to teach primary science. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 57–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kim, M. (2007). The challenges of teaching science as inquiry process: searching for the emergence of collective knowledge. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2(4), 829–834.Google Scholar
  21. Koray, O., Koksal, M. S., Ozdemir, M., & Presley, A. I. (2007). The effect of creative and critical thinking based laboratory applications on academic achievement and science process skills. Elementary Education Online, 6(3), 377–389.Google Scholar
  22. Lee, A. T., Hairston, R. V., Thames, R., Lawrence, T., & Herron, S. S. (2002). Using a computer simulation to teach science process skills to college biology and elementary education majors. Computer Simulations Bioscene, 28(4), 35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Meador, K. S. (2003). Thinking creatively about science suggestions for primary teachers. Gifted Child Today, 26(1), 25–29.Google Scholar
  24. Metz, K. E. (1995). Reassessment of developmental constraints on children’s science instruction. Review of Educational Research, 65, 93–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2003). Science year 6: integrated curriculum for primary schools: curriculum specifications. Kuala Lumpur: Curriculum Development Centre.Google Scholar
  26. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  27. Nevin, K. Ç., & Mustafa, S. (2010). An evaluation of science process skills of the science teaching majors. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1592–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oliveria, A. W. (2009). From professional development to classroom instruction: addressing issues related to science inquiry discourse. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(4), 865–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ong, S. L., Ismail, Z., & Fong, S. F. (2006). Development and validation of test for integrated science processes. Proceedings of International Conference on Measurement and Evaluation in Education, 149–156.Google Scholar
  30. Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rose, A. A. R. (2004). Inculcating & encouraging science process skills among Form Two students in a Malaysian Smart School. PhD Thesis: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Google Scholar
  32. Scanlon, E., Morris, E., Di Paolo, T., & Cooper, M. (2002). Contemporary approaches to learning science: technology-mediated practical work. Studies in Science Education, 38, 73–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Settlage, J., & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Teaching science to every child: using culture as a starting point. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  34. Shahali, E. H. M., & Halim, L. (2010). Development and validation of a test of integrated science process skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 142–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tan, M. T. (2000). Investigating science procedural skills among PKPG teachers after 14 weeks courses in Batu Lintang Teacher Training Institution. Retrieved November 28, 2012, from http://www.ipbl.edu.my/BM/penyelidikan/2001/2001_tan.pdf
  36. Temiz, B. K. (2007). Assessing science process skills in physics teaching. Retrieved September 28, 2012, from http://www.tused.org/thesissummary/default.asp? islem=detaylar&id =119.
  37. Tseng, C.-H., Tuan, H.-L., & Chin, C.-C. (2013). How to help teachers develop inquiry teaching: perspectives from experienced science teachers. Research in Science Education, 43(2), 809–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Windschitl, M. (2008). What is inquiry? A framework for thinking about authentic scientific practice in the classroom. In J. Luft, R. L. Bell, & J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.), Science as inquiry in the secondary setting (pp. 1–20). Arlington: NSTA Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wu, H.-K., & Wu, C.-L. (2011). Exploring the development of fifth graders’ practical epistemologies and explanation skills in inquiry-based learning classrooms. Research in Science Education, 41(3), 309–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edy H. M. Shahali
    • 1
  • Lilia Halim
    • 1
  • David F. Treagust
    • 2
  • Mihye Won
    • 2
  • A. L. Chandrasegaran
    • 2
  1. 1.Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaBangiMalaysia
  2. 2.Science and Mathematics Education CentreCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations