Secondary Science Teachers’ and Students’ Involvement in a Primary School Community of Science Practice: How It Changed Their Practices and Interest in Science
MyScience is a primary science education initiative in which being in a community of practice is integral to the learning process. In this initiative, stakeholder groups—primary teachers, primary students and mentors—interact around the ‘domain’ of ‘investigating scientifically’. This paper builds on three earlier publications and interprets the findings of the views of four secondary science teachers and five year 9 secondary science students who were first-timer participants—as mentors—in MyScience. Perceptions of these mentors’ interactions with primary students were analysed using attributes associated with both ‘communities of practice’ and the ‘nature of science’. Findings reveal that participation in MyScience changed secondary science teachers’ views and practices about how to approach the teaching of science in secondary school and fostered primary–secondary links. Year 9 students positively changed their views about secondary school science and confidence in science through participation as mentors. Implications for secondary science teaching and learning through participation in primary school community of science practice settings are discussed.
KeywordsCommunity of practice Science education Secondary school Secondary science teacher Secondary science student Views of science Confidence in science Interest in science
- Anfara, V., Brown, K., & Mangione, T. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28–38. doi:10.3102/0013189X031007028.
- Borg, T. (2009). The tenacity of teachers: the evolution of a teacher community of practice. Bathurst: Unpublished doctoral thesis. Charles Sturt University, Australia.Google Scholar
- Feasey, R. (2012). Thinking and working scientifically. In K. Skamp (Ed.), Teaching primary science constructively (4th ed., pp. 55–98). Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.Google Scholar
- Fensham, P. (2008). Science education policy-making: eleven emerging issues: UNESCO. Retrieved December 10, 2013 from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001567/156700e.pdf.
- Forbes, A., & McCloughan, G. (2010). Increasing student participation in science investigations in primary schools: the MyScience initiative. Teaching Science, 56(2), 24–30.Google Scholar
- Goodrum, D. & Rennie, L. (2007). Australian school science education: national action plan 2008–2012, Volume 1, The National Action Plan. Department of Education, Science and Training, Canberra. Retrieved January 16, 2014 from http://www.academia.edu/1157498/Australian_School_Science_Education_National_Action_Plan_2008-2012_Volume_1_The_national_action_plan.
- Hackling, M. (2005). Working scientifically: implementing and assessing in science. Perth: Education Department of Western Australia.Google Scholar
- Hackling, M. (2014). The status of STEM education in Australia: challenges and opportunities. Paper presented at the Australasian Science Education Conference, Melbourne.Google Scholar
- Hume, A. (2009). Authentic scientific inquiry and school science. Teaching Science, 55(2), 35–41.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2013). PISA 2015. Draft Science Framework. Retrieved June 20, 2014 from: http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/Draft%20PISA%202015%20Science%20Framework%20.pdf.
- Office of the Chief Scientist. (2012). Mathematics, engineering and science in the national interest. Retrieved January 17, 2014 from http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/Office-of-the-Chief-Scientist-MES-Report-8-May-2012.pdf.
- Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Rennie, L. (2005). Science awareness and scientific literacy. Teaching Science, 51(1), 10–14.Google Scholar
- Rennie, L. J. (2007). Learning science outside of school. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 125–167). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Rennie, L. J. (2010). Evaluation of the science by doing stage one professional learning approach. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
- Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 31–56). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Skamp, K. (2007). Conceptual learning in the primary and middle years. The interplay of heads, hearts and hand-on science: more than just a mantra. Teaching Science, 53(3), 18–22.Google Scholar
- Skamp, K. (2012). Teaching primary science: trial teacher feedback on the implementation of primary connections and the 5E model. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science.Google Scholar
- Stringer, E. (2013). Action research (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research. Retrieved January 17, 2014 from www.acer.edu.au/documents/AER51_ReimaginingSciEdu.pdf.
- Van Manen, M. (1997). Researching lived experience (2nd ed.). Canada: The Althouse.Google Scholar
- Watkins, R. (2010). Primary-secondary transfer: a science perspective. Primary Science, 111, 33–34.Google Scholar
- Wenger-Trayner, E. (2013). What is a community of practice? Retrieved January 17, 2014 from http://wenger-trayner.com/resources/what-is-a-community-of-practice/.