Research in Science Education

, Volume 45, Issue 3, pp 395–423 | Cite as

The Nature and Influence of Teacher Beliefs and Knowledge on the Science Teaching Practice of Three Generalist New Zealand Primary Teachers

  • Dayle AndersonEmail author


Students’ negative experiences of science in the primary sector have commonly been blamed on poor teacher content knowledge. Yet, teacher beliefs have long been identified as strong influences on classroom practice. Understanding the nature of teacher beliefs and their influence on primary science teaching practice could usefully inform teacher development initiatives. In science education, teacher beliefs about teaching and learning have been proposed as key influences in the development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. This paper uses a multiple qualitative case study design to examine the nature and influence of beliefs on the practice and knowledge development of three generalist primary teachers during the implementation of a unit of work in science. Data for each case study included observations and transcripts of recordings of the lessons forming each science unit, together with multiple interviews with the teacher throughout its implementation. Findings support those of other researchers suggesting that beliefs about purposes of science education, the nature of science, and science teaching and learning strongly influence teacher practice and knowledge. Beliefs about the purposes of science education were found to be a particularly strong influence on practice in the observed cases. However, beliefs about students and the teachers’ aims for education generally, as well as teachers’ notions concerning vertical science curriculum, were also crucially influential on the type of science learning opportunities that were promoted. Beliefs were found to additionally influence the nature of both subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for science developed by the teachers.


Teacher beliefs Teacher knowledge Primary science education Subject matter knowledge Pedagogical content knowledge 


  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abell, S. K. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 1105–1149). Mahweh: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, D., & Clark, M. (2012). Development of syntactic subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for science by a generalist elementary teacher. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 18(3), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, D., & Moeed, A. (2013). Working with scientists: impacts of a novel approach to professional development on primary teachers’ beliefs about science teaching. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association Conference, Nicosia.Google Scholar
  5. Appleton, K. (2002). Science activities that work: perceptions of primary school teachers. Research in Science Education, 32, 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward and understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Appleton, K. (2006). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: international perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 31–54). Mahwah: Association for Science Teachers and Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  8. Appleton, K. (2007). Elementary science teaching. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 493–595). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Bartholomew, R., Moeed, A., & Anderson, D. (2010). Changing science teaching practice in early career secondary teaching graduates. Eurasian Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology, 7(1), 5–17.Google Scholar
  10. Beyer, C. J., & Davis, E. A. (2009). Using educative curriculum materials to support preservice elementary teachers’ curricular planning: a comparison between two different forms of support. Curriculun Inquiry, 39(5), 679–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blake, A., Donald, C., Datt, A., & Xiaoyan, B. (2011). Cross-cultural learning design: past the head and the hands to the HEART of the matter. Paper presented at the 11th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Athens, Georgia.Google Scholar
  12. Bryan, L. (2003). Nestedness of beliefs: examining a prospective elementary teacher’s belief system about science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 835–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bryan, L. (2012). Research on teacher beliefs. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 1, pp. 477–498). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bull, A., Gilbert, J., Barwick, R., Hipkins, R., & Baker, R. (2010). Inspired by science. A paper commissioned by the Royal Society of New Zealand and the Prime Minister’s Chief Science Advisor. Retrieved June 27, 2011, from
  15. Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709–725). New York: Simon & Shuster Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. Chamberlain, M., & Caygill, R. (2012). Key findings from New Zealand’s participation in the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) and Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) in 2010/11. Retrieved March 25, 2013, from
  17. Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: an integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (Vol. 7). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: new roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 916–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis, E. A. (2004). Knowledge integration in science teaching: analysing teachers’ knowledge development. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 21–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Donald, C., Anderson, D., & Barker, M. (2013). Broadening the frame: towards reconciling teacher beliefs and practice in primary school science teaching. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Conference, Nicosia.Google Scholar
  22. Donald, C., Blake, A., Girault, I., Datt, A., & Ramsay, E. (2009). Approaches to learning design: past the head and the hands to the HEART of the matter. Distance Education, 30(2), 179–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Education Review Office (2010). Science in Years 5 to 8: Capable and competent teaching. Retrieved June 6, 2010, from
  24. Education Review Office (2012).Science in the New Zealand Curriculum Years 5 to 8. Retrieved December 13, 2013, from
  25. Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Feldman, A. (2002). Multiple perspectives for the study of teaching: knowledge, reason, understanding, and being. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39, 1032–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fitzgerald, A., Dawson, V., & Hackling, M. (2013). Examining beliefs and practices of four effective Australian primary science teachers. Research in Science Education, 43, 981–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Friedrichsen, P., Van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95(2), 358–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Friedrichsen, P. M., & Dana, T. M. (2005). Substantive-level theory of highly regarded biology teachers’ science teaching orientations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 218–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gess-Newsome, J. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge: an introduction and orientation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 3–16). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  31. Gess-Newsome, J. (2013). The PCK summit consensus model and definition of pedagogical content knowledge. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association Conference, Nicosia.Google Scholar
  32. Goodrum, D., & Rennie, L. (2007). Australian School Science Education National Action Plan 2008–2012. Volume 1. The National Action Plan. Retrieved December 12, 2009, from:
  33. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: a reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 273–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Heap, R. (2006). Myth busting and tenet building: primary and early childhood teachers’ understanding of the nature of science. Auckland: Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  36. Hodson, D. (2008). Towards scientific literacy: a teacher’s guide to the history, philosophy and sociology of science. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  37. Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science. Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  38. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: a review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 331–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lotter, C., Harwood, W. S., & Bonner, J. J. (2007). The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers’ use of inquiry teaching practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(9), 1318–1347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  43. Mansour, N. (2009). Science teachers’ beliefs and practices: issues, implications and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 4(1), 25–48.Google Scholar
  44. Mansour, N. (2013). Consistencies and inconsistencies between science teachers’ beliefs and practices. International Journal of Science Education, 35(7), 1230–1275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McEwan, H., & Bull, B. (1991). The pedagogic nature of subject matter knowledge. American Educational Research Journal, 28(2), 316–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Merriam, S. B. (2001). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (Vol. 2). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Ministry of Education. (1993). Science in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  49. Ministry of Education. (2001). Making better sense of the material world. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  50. Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  51. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nolan, P., & Brown, M. (2001). Educating the students in the middle: getting it right with or without the middle schools. Set, 3, 25–28.Google Scholar
  53. Pajares, M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pimentel, D. S., & McNeill, K. L. (2013). Conducting talk in secondary science classrooms: investigating instructional moves and teachers’ beliefs. Science Education, 97(3), 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: the role of educative materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(3), 221–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schwab, J. J. (1964). The structure of the disciplines: meaning and significance. In G. W. Ford & L. Pugno (Eds.), The structure of knowledge and the curriculum (pp. 31–49). Chicago: Rand Mc Nally.Google Scholar
  57. Scott, D., & Usher, R. (2011). Researching education: data methods and theory in educational inquiry (Vol. 2). London: Continuum International.Google Scholar
  58. Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sikka, A., Nath, J., & Cohen, M. (2007). Practicing teachers’ beliefs and uses of assessment. International Journal of Case Method Research and Application, 19(3), 239–253.Google Scholar
  61. Smith, D. C. (1999). Changing our teaching: the role of pedagogical content knowledge in elementary science. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 163–197). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  62. Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
  63. Starkey, L. (2010). Teachers’ pedagogical reasoning and action in the digital age. Teachers and Teaching, 16(2), 233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tiplady, G. M. (2004). Pedagogical content knowing in primary science teaching. Unpublished master’s thesis, Auckland College of Education, Auckland, New Zealand.Google Scholar
  65. Traianou, A. (2006). Teachers’ adequacy of subject knowledge in primary science: assessing constructivist approaches from a sociocultural perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 827–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tsai, C. (2002). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers’ beliefs of teaching, learning, and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 771–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Turner-Bisset, R. (1999). The knowledge bases of the expert teacher. British Educational Research Journal, 25(1), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Australian Education Review. Victoria, Australia: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  69. Waters-Adams, S. (2006). The relationship between understanding of the nature of science and practice: the influence of teachers’ beliefs about education, teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 919–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationVictoria University of WellingtonWellingtonNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations