The Examination of a Pullout STEM Program for Urban Upper Elementary Students
- 1.1k Downloads
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a pullout STEM program (STARBASE) makes reading and math scores decrease and examine its impact on urban fourth, fifth, and sixth grade students’ attitudes and perceptions regarding STEM education and careers. We employed a mixed-methods, case study approach that involved two published and one indigenous instrument composed of Likert scales, semantic differential scales, and open-ended items, along with structured interviews. Results indicate that it is possible for reading, math, and social studies scores to be unaffected when implementing a STEM pullout program, as adjusted trends (for ethnicity and socioeconomic status) are not statistically different from those of non-STARBASE school divisions in the area. Additionally, the Black/White achievement gap, as measured by standardized test scores, was substantially closed over the last decade within STARBASE schools. Quantitative measures revealed few differences in student attitudes from pre- to posttest. Student qualitative responses were overwhelmingly positive. Students wanted more STARBASE time in the regular school year. Students, particularly Black students, also wanted an increase in career education opportunities. Implications regarding curricular changes aimed at STEM education and model adoption are addressed.
KeywordsSTEM STEM education Underrepresented populations Urban Achievement gap Testing Standardized tests
- Anderson, E. & Kim, D. (2006). Increasing the success of minority students in science and technology. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
- Auger, R. W., & Blackhurst, A. E. (2005). The development of elementary-aged children’s career aspirations and expectations. American School Counselor Association Journal, 8(4), 322–329.Google Scholar
- Bayer Corporation. (2010). Planting the seeds for a diverse U.S. STEM pipeline: a compendium of best practice K-12 STEM education programs. http://www.bayerus.com/MSMS/web_docs/COMPENDIUM.pdf. Retrieved 8 Oct 2013.
- Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: an introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- Byars-Winston, A., Estrada, Y., & Howard, C. (2008). Increasing STEM retention for underrepresented students: factors that matter. http://www.cew.wisc.edu/docs/resource_collections/CEW_InSTEMRetention_UWMadison.pdf. Retrieved 8 Oct 2013.
- Bybee, R., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Carlson, J., Westbrook, A., Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: origins and effectiveness. Colorado Springs: BSCS.Google Scholar
- Custer, R.L. & Daugherty, J.L. (2009). The nature and status of STEM professional development: Effective practices for secondary level engineering education. http://digitalcommons.usu.edu/ncete_cstudies/11/. Retrieved 8 Oct 13.
- Eccles, J.S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(4), 585–609.Google Scholar
- Fairweather, J. (2008). Linking evidence and promising practices in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) undergraduate education: a status report for The National Academies National Research Council Board of Science Education. http://sites.nationalacademies.org/DBASSE/BOSE/DBASSE_071087. Retrieved 8 Oct 2013.
- Fratt, L. (2002). Less is more: triming the overstuffed curriculum. District Administration, 38(3), 56–60.Google Scholar
- Hayden, K., Ouyang, Y., Scinski, L., Olszewski, B., & Bielefeldt, T. (2011). Increasing student interest and attitudes in STEM: professional development and activities to engage and inspire learners. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1). http://www.citejournal.org/vol11/iss1/science/article1.cfm. Retrieved 8 Oct 13.
- Henson, K. T. (2006). Curriculum planning: Integrating multiculturalism, constructivism, and education reform. Long Grove: Waveland Press.Google Scholar
- Herrera, F. A. & Hurtado, S. (2012). Maintaining initial interests: Developing science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) career aspirations among underrepresented racial minority students. http://heri.ucla.edu/nih/downloads/AERA%202011%20-%20Herrera%20and%20Hurtado%20-%20Maintaining%20Initial%20Interests.pdf. Retrieved 8 Oct 2013.
- Hoachlander, G., & Yanofsky, D. (2011). Making STEM real. Educational Leadership, 68(6), 60–65.Google Scholar
- International Communications Research. (2011). Bayer facts of science education XV: a view from the gatekeepers—STEM department chairs at America’s top 200 research universities on female and underrepresented minority undergraduate STEM students. Media: Author.Google Scholar
- International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (2007). Standards for technological literacy. Reston: Author.Google Scholar
- Jennings, J., & Rentner, D. (2006). Ten big effects of the no child left behind act on public schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 88(2), 110–113.Google Scholar
- Johnson, J. Rochkind, J. & Ott, A. (2010). Are we beginning to see the light? Public Agenda. http://www.publicagenda.org/pages/math-and-science-ed-2010. Retrieved 8 Oct 2013.
- Kersaint, G., Borman, K. M., Lee, R., & Boydston, T. L. (2001). Balancing the contradictions between accountability and systemic reform. Journal of School Leadership, 11(3), 217–240.Google Scholar
- Massachusetts Biotechnology Education Foundation. (2012). 500 Massachusetts high school students spend a day in biotech laboratories. Massachusetts Biotechnology Council. http://www.massbio.org/news/290-500_massachusetts_high_school_students_spend_a/news_detail. Retrieved 8 Oct 2013.
- McMillian, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: evidence-based inquiry. Boston: Pearson/Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- McMurrer, J. (2008). Instructional time in elementary schools: a closer look at changes for specific subjects. Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy (CEP).Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- National Science and Technology Council. (2011). The federal science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education portfolio (Pub. L. No. 111–358). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
- National Science Foundation. (2012). Education discoveries. http://www.nsf.gov/discoveries/index.jsp?prio_area=7. Retrieved 10 Aug 2012.
- Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Perlstein, L. (2007). Tested: one American school struggles to make the grade. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
- Pillai, S., & Lightle, K. (2009). Opening the door to STEM careers. Middle Ground, 13(1), 28–29.Google Scholar
- Saka, Y. (2007). Exploring the interaction of personal and contextual factors during the induction period of science teachers and how this interaction shapes their enactment of science reform (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Database. (UMI No. 3312780)Google Scholar
- Sanders, M. (2009). STEM, STEM education, STEM mania. Technology Teacher, 68(4), 20–26.Google Scholar
- Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
- STARBASE Victory. (2010). STARBASE victory: launching futures, one child at a time. http://www.starbasevictory.org/. Retrieved 8 Oct 2013.
- Tyler-Wood, T., Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2010). Instruments for assessing interest in STEM content and careers. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(2), 341–363.Google Scholar
- UMass Donahue Institute Research & Evaluation Group. (2011). Increasing student interest in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM): Massachusetts STEM pipeline fund programs using promising practices. http://digits.us.com/wp-content/themes/digits/Student-Interest-Programs-Using-Promising-Practices(P3).pdf. Retrieved 8 Oct 2013.
- Virginia Department of Education. (2012). Statistics & Reports: School Report Card, (2001–2011) [Data file]. Available from the Virginia Department of Education site, http://www.doe.virginia.gov/statistics_reports/school_report_card/. 24 Jan 2013.
- Wang, H., Moore, T. J., Roehrig, G. H., & Park, M. S. (2011). STEM integration: teacher perceptions and practice. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 1(2), 1–13.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar