Abstract
This paper reports on a study undertaken with the primary aim of investigating the role of wonder in the learning process. The study was carried out by a 9th grade science teacher in collaboration with a university professor. The teacher taught two classrooms of 27 and 30 students respectively, by trying to evoke a sense of wonder only in one of them. To this end the teacher identified ideas and phenomena as potential sources of wonder and initiated the instruction through these ideas and phenomena. Observation and especially student optional journals were the main instruments of the research. A quantitative analysis of journal entries made by the students of both classrooms, provided evidence for higher involvement for the students—both males and females—of the classroom where the teacher evoked a sense of wonder. Also an analysis of students’ comments provided evidence that wonder, experienced as astonishment and a shock of awareness can help students change their outlook on natural phenomena. Moreover two paper-and-pencil tests administered at the end of the school year provided additional evidence that wonder had an effect on students’ ability to remember “wonder-full” ideas and also an effect on better understanding, of at least, three phenomena. This empirical evidence of better retention and understanding is evidence of the role of wonder as an attention catcher and generally of the role of affective factors in the learning process.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.
Aikenhead, G. (2002). Whose scientific knowledge? The colonized and the colonized. In W.-M. Roth & J. Desautels (Eds.), Science as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 151–166). New York: Peter Lang.
Berlyne, D. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Borg, W., & Gall, M. (1989). Educational research. New York: Longman.
Brickhouse, N. (1994). Bringing in the outsiders: the sciences of the future. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 131–142.
Brickhouse, N. (2001). Embodying science: a feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 282–295.
Brickhouse, N. (2003). Science for all? Science for girls? Which girls? In R. Cross (Ed.), A vision for science education (pp. 93–101). London & New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton.
Burke, E. (1990). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas. New York.
Chin, C., Brown, D., & Bruce, B. (2002). Student generated questions: a meaningful aspect of learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 521–549.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.
Costa, V. (1995). When science is “another world”: relationships between the worlds of family, friends, school and science. Science Education, 79, 313–333.
Dawkins, R. (1998). Unweaving the rainbow: Science, delusion, and the appetite for wonder. New York: Teachers College Press.
Drew, C., Hardman, C., & Hosp, J. (2008). Designing and conducting research in education. Los Angeles: Sage.
Egan, K. (1990). Romantic understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Egan, K. (1997). The educated mind. How cognitive tools shape our understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Egan, K. (2005). An imaginative approach to teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Eisley, L. (1978). The star thrower. New York: Times Books.
Feynman, R. (1964). The value of science. In A. Arons & A. Bork (Eds.), Science and ideas (pp. 3–12). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Feynman, R. (1968). What is science? Physics Teacher, 7, 313–320.
Girod, M. (2007). A conceptual overview of the role of beauty and aesthetics in science and science education. Studies in Science Education, 43, 38–61.
Goodwin, A. (2001). Wonder in science teaching and learning. School Science Review, 83, 69–73.
Green, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2001). The role of wonder and «romance» in early childhood science education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9, 63–69.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2005a). Inclusive practice in science education: Fulbright Project—Part I: Theoretical framework. Unpublished paper, Department of Curriculum & Instruction, University of Northern Iowa, summer 2005.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2005b). Romantic understanding and science education. Teaching Education, 16, 23–32.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2006). Exploring the possibilities for developing romantic understanding through storytelling. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning Science Through Storytelling. Deutsches Museum, Munich, July 4–7, 2006.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2007). Wonder: Why is it important and how can it be evoked in the science classroom? Paper presented in the 5th International Conference on Imagination and Education. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada, July 14–17, 2007.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2008a). Encouraging involvement with school science. Journal of Curriculum & Pedagogy, 5, 138–162.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2008b). Reclaiming the value of wonder in science education. Paper presented in the 2nd Summer Institute on Imaginative Education, Delta Vancouver Airport Hotel, Vancouver, Canada, July 7–9, 2008.
Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Garganourakis, V. (2010). Using Nikola Tesla’s story and experiments, as presented in the film “the prestige”, to promote scientific inquiry. Interchange, 41, 363–378.
Hein, H. (1996). The art of displaying science: Museum exhibitions. In A. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science (pp. 267–288). Boston: Kluwer.
Hove, P. (1996). The face of wonder. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 437–462.
Howe, A. (1971). A lost dimension in elementary science education. Science Education, 55, 143–146.
Jardine, D., Clifford, P., & Friesen, S. (2003). Back to the basics of teaching and learning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Jenkins, E., & Nelson, N. (2005). Important but not for me: students’ attitudes toward secondary school science in England. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23, 41–57.
Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 11, 613–623.
Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity. A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75–98.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000. Milton Keynes.
Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Opdal, P. M. (2001). Curiosity, wonder and education seen as perspective development. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20, 331–344.
Ormrod, J. (1999). Human learning. Upper Saddle River: Merrill.
Peters, R. (1973). Aims of education: A conceptual enquiry. In R. Peters (Ed.), The philosophy of education (pp. 1–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Polkinghorne, J. (1998). Beyond science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Postman, N. (1995). The end of education. New York: Knopf.
Pugh, K. (2004). Newton’s laws beyond the classroom walls. Science Education, 88, 182–196.
Root-Bernstein, R. (2002). Aesthetic cognition. International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 16, 61–77.
Santayana, G. (1995). The sense of beauty: Being the outline f an aesthetic theory. New York: Dover (Original work published 1896).
Schank, R. (2004). Making minds less well educated than our own. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Sears, P., & Kessen, W. (1964). Statement of purposes and objectives of science education in school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 1–4.
Silverman, M. (1989). Two sides of wonder: philosophical keys to the motivation of science learning. Synthese, 80, 43–46.
Stolberg, T. (2008). Whither the sense of wonder f pre-service primary teachers’ when teaching science? A preliminary study of personal experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 1958–1964.
Stone, R. (2006). Curiosity as the thief of wonder. Kronoscope, 6, 205–229.
Tauber, A. (Ed.). (1996). The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science. Boston and London: Kluwer.
Taylor, J. (1998). Poetic knowledge. The recovery of education. New York: SUNY Press.
Verhoven, C. (1972). The philosophy of wonder. New York: McMillan.
Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
Wickmann, P. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning making as situated talk and action. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Williams, C., Stanisstreet, M., Spall, K., Boyes, E., & Dickson, D. (2003). Why aren’t secondary students interested in physics? Physics Education, 38, 324–329.
Witz, K. (1996). Science with values and values for science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 597–612.
Woolgar, S. (1993). Science: The very idea. London: Routledge.
Acknowledgement
The author wishes to thank the three anonymous reviewers for their comments on the first draft of this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hadzigeorgiou, Y.P. Fostering a Sense of Wonder in the Science Classroom. Res Sci Educ 42, 985–1005 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9225-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9225-6