Research in Science Education

, Volume 42, Issue 5, pp 985–1005 | Cite as

Fostering a Sense of Wonder in the Science Classroom

Article

Abstract

This paper reports on a study undertaken with the primary aim of investigating the role of wonder in the learning process. The study was carried out by a 9th grade science teacher in collaboration with a university professor. The teacher taught two classrooms of 27 and 30 students respectively, by trying to evoke a sense of wonder only in one of them. To this end the teacher identified ideas and phenomena as potential sources of wonder and initiated the instruction through these ideas and phenomena. Observation and especially student optional journals were the main instruments of the research. A quantitative analysis of journal entries made by the students of both classrooms, provided evidence for higher involvement for the students—both males and females—of the classroom where the teacher evoked a sense of wonder. Also an analysis of students’ comments provided evidence that wonder, experienced as astonishment and a shock of awareness can help students change their outlook on natural phenomena. Moreover two paper-and-pencil tests administered at the end of the school year provided additional evidence that wonder had an effect on students’ ability to remember “wonder-full” ideas and also an effect on better understanding, of at least, three phenomena. This empirical evidence of better retention and understanding is evidence of the role of wonder as an attention catcher and generally of the role of affective factors in the learning process.

Keywords

Science Wonder Learning Secondary education 

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. (1996). Science education: border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aikenhead, G. (2002). Whose scientific knowledge? The colonized and the colonized. In W.-M. Roth & J. Desautels (Eds.), Science as/for sociopolitical action (pp. 151–166). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  3. Berlyne, D. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borg, W., & Gall, M. (1989). Educational research. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  5. Brickhouse, N. (1994). Bringing in the outsiders: the sciences of the future. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 131–142.Google Scholar
  6. Brickhouse, N. (2001). Embodying science: a feminist perspective on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 282–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brickhouse, N. (2003). Science for all? Science for girls? Which girls? In R. Cross (Ed.), A vision for science education (pp. 93–101). London & New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  8. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  9. Burke, E. (1990). A philosophical enquiry into the origin of our ideas. New York.Google Scholar
  10. Chin, C., Brown, D., & Bruce, B. (2002). Student generated questions: a meaningful aspect of learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 521–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Costa, V. (1995). When science is “another world”: relationships between the worlds of family, friends, school and science. Science Education, 79, 313–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dawkins, R. (1998). Unweaving the rainbow: Science, delusion, and the appetite for wonder. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Drew, C., Hardman, C., & Hosp, J. (2008). Designing and conducting research in education. Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Egan, K. (1990). Romantic understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Egan, K. (1997). The educated mind. How cognitive tools shape our understanding. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Egan, K. (2005). An imaginative approach to teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Eisley, L. (1978). The star thrower. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
  19. Feynman, R. (1964). The value of science. In A. Arons & A. Bork (Eds.), Science and ideas (pp. 3–12). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  20. Feynman, R. (1968). What is science? Physics Teacher, 7, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Girod, M. (2007). A conceptual overview of the role of beauty and aesthetics in science and science education. Studies in Science Education, 43, 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goodwin, A. (2001). Wonder in science teaching and learning. School Science Review, 83, 69–73.Google Scholar
  23. Green, M. (1978). Landscapes of learning. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  24. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2001). The role of wonder and «romance» in early childhood science education. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9, 63–69.Google Scholar
  25. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2005a). Inclusive practice in science education: Fulbright Project—Part I: Theoretical framework. Unpublished paper, Department of Curriculum & Instruction, University of Northern Iowa, summer 2005.Google Scholar
  26. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2005b). Romantic understanding and science education. Teaching Education, 16, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2006). Exploring the possibilities for developing romantic understanding through storytelling. Paper presented at the 1st International Conference on Teaching and Learning Science Through Storytelling. Deutsches Museum, Munich, July 4–7, 2006.Google Scholar
  28. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2007). Wonder: Why is it important and how can it be evoked in the science classroom? Paper presented in the 5th International Conference on Imagination and Education. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, Canada, July 14–17, 2007.Google Scholar
  29. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2008a). Encouraging involvement with school science. Journal of Curriculum & Pedagogy, 5, 138–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2008b). Reclaiming the value of wonder in science education. Paper presented in the 2nd Summer Institute on Imaginative Education, Delta Vancouver Airport Hotel, Vancouver, Canada, July 7–9, 2008.Google Scholar
  31. Hadzigeorgiou, Y., & Garganourakis, V. (2010). Using Nikola Tesla’s story and experiments, as presented in the film “the prestige”, to promote scientific inquiry. Interchange, 41, 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hein, H. (1996). The art of displaying science: Museum exhibitions. In A. Tauber (Ed.), The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science (pp. 267–288). Boston: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hove, P. (1996). The face of wonder. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 437–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Howe, A. (1971). A lost dimension in elementary science education. Science Education, 55, 143–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jardine, D., Clifford, P., & Friesen, S. (2003). Back to the basics of teaching and learning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  36. Jenkins, E., & Nelson, N. (2005). Important but not for me: students’ attitudes toward secondary school science in England. Research in Science and Technological Education, 23, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change. Learning and Instruction, 11, 613–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity. A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000. Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
  40. Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Opdal, P. M. (2001). Curiosity, wonder and education seen as perspective development. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 20, 331–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ormrod, J. (1999). Human learning. Upper Saddle River: Merrill.Google Scholar
  43. Peters, R. (1973). Aims of education: A conceptual enquiry. In R. Peters (Ed.), The philosophy of education (pp. 1–35). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Polkinghorne, J. (1998). Beyond science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Postman, N. (1995). The end of education. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  46. Pugh, K. (2004). Newton’s laws beyond the classroom walls. Science Education, 88, 182–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Root-Bernstein, R. (2002). Aesthetic cognition. International Studies in Philosophy of Science, 16, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Santayana, G. (1995). The sense of beauty: Being the outline f an aesthetic theory. New York: Dover (Original work published 1896).Google Scholar
  49. Schank, R. (2004). Making minds less well educated than our own. Mahwah: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  50. Sears, P., & Kessen, W. (1964). Statement of purposes and objectives of science education in school. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Silverman, M. (1989). Two sides of wonder: philosophical keys to the motivation of science learning. Synthese, 80, 43–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stolberg, T. (2008). Whither the sense of wonder f pre-service primary teachers’ when teaching science? A preliminary study of personal experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(8), 1958–1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stone, R. (2006). Curiosity as the thief of wonder. Kronoscope, 6, 205–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tauber, A. (Ed.). (1996). The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science. Boston and London: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  55. Taylor, J. (1998). Poetic knowledge. The recovery of education. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  56. Verhoven, C. (1972). The philosophy of wonder. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
  57. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Wickmann, P. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning making as situated talk and action. New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  59. Williams, C., Stanisstreet, M., Spall, K., Boyes, E., & Dickson, D. (2003). Why aren’t secondary students interested in physics? Physics Education, 38, 324–329.Google Scholar
  60. Witz, K. (1996). Science with values and values for science. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28, 597–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Woolgar, S. (1993). Science: The very idea. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationUniversity of the AegeanRhodesGreece

Personalised recommendations