Research in Science Education

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 651–671 | Cite as

Children’s Teleological Intuitions: What Kind of Explanations Do 7–8 Year Olds Give for the Features of Organisms, Artifacts and Natural Objects?

  • Kostas Kampourakis
  • Vasiliki Pavlidi
  • Maria Papadopoulou
  • Eirini Palaiokrassa
Article

Abstract

Research has shown that children usually provide teleological explanations for the features of organisms from a very early age (3–4 years old). However, it is not clear if teleology is applied selectively for organisms, or if it is generally applied to other objects as well (artifacts and non-living natural objects). The present study examined whether 7–8 year old students provided teleological explanations for particular organisms, artifacts and natural objects. We investigated whether children's familiarity with these objects influenced the types of explanations they gave. Finally, we also investigated correlations between 'teleology' and 'usefulness' in children's explanations. The results indicate that 7–8 year olds are able to distinguish between living and non-living entities, as well as that they provide teleological explanations mostly for organisms and artifacts. This may have important implications for biological education, since teleological explanations in classrooms are likely to pose important conceptual obstacles to the development of a scientific understanding of evolution.

Keywords

Artifacts Elementary students Evolution education Organisms Natural objects Teleology 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Dimitra Tsetsou and Vassiliki Zerva for their assistance in data collection and data coding. We also thank Aggeliki Zacharaki, Dora Christodoulou and Sofia Batskini for their assistance in data collection. Finally, we are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for providing useful suggestions.

References

  1. Ariew, A. (2003). Ernst Mayr’s ‘Ultimate/Proximate’ distinction reconsidered and reconstructed. Biology and Philosophy, 18, 553–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ariew, A. (2007). Teleology. In D. Hull & M. Ruse (Eds.), Cambridge companion to the philosophy of biology (pp. 160–181). Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  3. Avise, J. C. (2010). Inside the human genome: A case for non-intelligent design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloom, P., & Weisberg, D. S. (2007). Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science, 316, 996–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Branch, G., & Scott, E. C. (2009). The latest face of Creationism. Scientific American, 300(1), 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carey, S. (2000). Science education as conceptual change. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Curry, A. (2009). Creationist beliefs persist in Europe. Science, 323, 1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DiYanni, C., & Kelemen, D. (2005). Time to get a new mountain? The role of function in children’s conceptions of natural kinds. Cognition, 97, 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elder, C. L. (2007). On the place of artifacts in ontology. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (Eds.), Creations of the mind: Theories of artifacts and their representation (pp. 33–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Evans, E. M. (2008). Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: A developmental analysis. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 263–294). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Graebsch, A., & Schiermeier, Q. (2006). Anti-evolutionists raise their profile in Europe. Nature, 444, 406–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greif, M., Kemler-Nelson, D., Keil, F. C., & Guiterrez, F. (2006). What do children want to know about animals and artifacts?: Domain-specific requests for information. Psychological Science, 17(6), 455–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hubbard, R. S., & Power, B. M. (2003). The art of classroom inquiry. A handbook for teachers—researchers. Portsmouth: Heinmann.Google Scholar
  15. Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2008). Students’ intuitive explanations of the causes of homologies and adaptations. Science & Education, 17(1), 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2009). Preliminary evolutionary explanations: a basic framework for conceptual change and explanatory coherence in evolution. Science & Education, 18(10), 1313–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. Keil, F. C. (1992). The origins of an autonomous biology. In M. R. Gunnar & M. Maratsos (Eds.), Modularity and constraints in language and cognition. Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology (Vol. 25) (pp. 103–138). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. Keil, F. C. (1994). The birth and nurturance concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234–254). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Keil, F. C. (1995). The growth of causal understanding of natural kinds. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. J. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multi-disciplinary debate (pp. 234–262). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kelemen, D. (1999a). Function, goals and intention: children’s teleological reasoning about objects. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(12), 461–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelemen, D. (1999b). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition, 70, 241–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kelemen, D. (1999c). Why are rocks pointy?: children’s preference for teleological explanations of the natural world. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1440–1452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lennox, J. G. (1992). Teleology. In E. F. Keller & E. A. Lloyd (Eds.), Keywords in evolutionary biology (pp. 324–333). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lewens, T. (2004). Organisms and artifacts: Design in nature and elsewhere. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  26. Mayr, E. (1961). Cause and effect in biology. Science, 134, 1501–1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meijer, P. C., Korthagen, F. A. J., & Vasalos, A. (2009). Supporting presence in teacher education: the connection between the personal and professional aspects of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(2), 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313(5788), 765–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Numbers, R. (2009). That Creationism is a uniquely American phenomenon. In R. Numbers (Ed.), Galileo goes to jail, and other myths about science and religion (pp. 215–223). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Smith, M. U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. pedagogical issues. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 539–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sommers, T., & Rosenberg, A. (2003). Darwin’s nihilistic idea: evolution and the meaninglessness of life. Biology and Philosophy, 18, 653–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Southerland, S. A., Abrams, E., Cummins, C. L., & Anselmo, J. (2001). Understanding. students’ explanations of biological phenomena: conceptual frameworks or p-prims? Science Education, 85, 328–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walsh, D. (2008). Teleology. In M. Ruse (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology (pp. 113–137). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Williams, G. C. (2001/1996). Plan and purpose in nature: The limits of Darwinian evolution. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kostas Kampourakis
    • 1
  • Vasiliki Pavlidi
    • 1
  • Maria Papadopoulou
    • 1
  • Eirini Palaiokrassa
    • 1
  1. 1.Geitonas SchoolVari AttikisGreece

Personalised recommendations