Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 811–832 | Cite as

“Romantic”, “Classic” and “Baroque” Views of Nature: An Analysis of Pictures About the Environment in Greek Primary School Textbooks—Diachronic Considerations

  • Rea Lemoni
  • Anastasia G. StamouEmail author
  • George P. Stamou
Article

Abstract

Taking the view that pictures are not a transparent but rather a deforming mirror of reality, shaping representations of the world bound up with the interests of the social institutions within which pictures are circulated and read, our aim is to explore what view of nature and of the human-nature relationship is built in Greek natural science school textbooks. The particular textbooks analysed have been recently introduced (in 2006 and 2007) into Greek education. The pictorial analysis suggests that a “baroque” view of nature and of the human-nature relationship predominantly emerges, according to which nature is constantly in motion, and therefore random and unpredictable natural change could be “normal”. Natural environments are viewed in materialistic terms, being transformed by humans and serving as a resource. A comparison with our analysis of the older textbooks written in the early 1980s (Korfiatis et al. 2004) seems to indicate important conceptual differences between the two series of textbooks. The “romantic” and “classic” views of nature in the old textbooks could express the vigour, the optimism and the innocence characterising industrial societies (or in the process of industrialisation) about human interventions in the environment. Conversely, the “baroque” view found in the new textbooks probably marks the scepticism of post-industrial societies about natural phenomena.

Keywords

Companion meanings Content analysis Greece Pictorial analysis School textbooks Views of nature 

Notes

Acknowledgements

All pictures from the Greek school textbooks are reproduced with the kind permission of the Greek Institute of Education.

References

  1. Arcury, T. A., Johnson, T. P., & Scollay, S. J. (1986). Ecological worldview and environmental knowledge: the “new environmental paradigm”. The Journal of Environmental Education, 17, 35–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baxter, B. (1999). Environmental ethics—values or obligations? A reply to O’Neill. Environmental Values, 8, 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1996). Reflexive modernisation: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  4. Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carvalho, G. S., Silva, R., & Clément, P. (2007). Historical analysis of Portuguese primary school textbooks (1920–2005) on the topic of digestion. International Journal of Science Education, 29(2), 173–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, G. (2001). Must there be a balance of nature? Biology and Philosophy, 16, 481–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuddington, K. (2001). The “balance of nature” metaphor and equilibrium in population ecology. Biology and Philosophy, 16, 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dimopoulos, K., Koulaidis, V., & Sklaveniti, S. (2003). Towards an analysis of visual images in school science textbooks and press articles about science and technology. Research in Science Education, 33, 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elgar, A. G. (2004). Science textbooks for lower secondary schools in Brunei: issues of gender equity. International Journal of Science Education, 26(7), 875–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eltinge, E. M., & Roberts, C. W. (1993). Linguistic content analysis: a method to measure science as inquiry in textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(1), 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: self and society in the late modern age. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  12. Hagen, J. (1989). Research perspectives and the anomalous status of modern ecology. Biology and Philosophy, 4, 433–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hartig, T. (1993). Nature experience in transactional perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning, 25, 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jax, K. (1998). Holocoen and ecosystem: On the origin and historical consequences of two concepts. Journal of the History of Biology, 31, 113–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, O. (2002). Naturally not! Childhood, the urban and romanticism. Human Ecology Review, 9(2), 17–30.Google Scholar
  16. Kaplan, S., & Kaplan, R. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Knain, E. (2001). Ideologies in school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 319–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Korfiatis, K. J., Stamou, A. G., & Paraskevopoulos, S. (2004). Images of nature in Greek primary school textbooks. Science Education, 88, 72–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Krippendorff, K. (1980). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology. London: The Sage Commtext Series, Sage Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
  21. Kwa, C. (2002). Romantic and baroque conceptions of complex wholes in the sciences. In J. Law & A. Mol (Eds.), Complexities: Social studies of knowledge practices (pp. 23–52). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Law, J. (2004). And if the global were small, and noncoherent? Method, complexity and the baroque. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 15, 731–756.Google Scholar
  25. Law, J., & Hassard, J. (Eds.). (1999). Actor network theory and after. Oxford & Keele: Blackwell and the Sociological Review.Google Scholar
  26. Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Levins, R., & Lewontin, R. (1985). The dialectical biologist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Myers, G. (1995). Words and pictures in a biology textbook. In T. Miller (Ed.), Functional approaches to written text: Classroom applications (pp. 113–126). Paris: TESOL.Google Scholar
  29. Ninnes, P. (2000). Representations of indigenous knowledges in secondary school science textbooks in Australia and Canada. International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 603–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Neill, O. (1997). Environmental values, anthropocentrism and speciesism. Environmental Values, 6, 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Östman, L. (1998). How companion meanings are expressed by science education discourse. In D. A. Roberts & L. Östman (Eds.), Problems of meaning in science curriculum (pp. 54–70). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  32. Peeck, J. (1993). Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated texts. Learning and Instruction, 3, 227–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pickering, A. (1984). Constructing quarks: A sociological history of particle physics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Pickett, S. T., Kolasa, J., & Jones, C. G. (1994). Ecological understanding: The nature of theory and the theory of nature. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  35. Potter, E. F., & Rosser, S. V. (1992). Factors in life science textbooks that may deter girls’ interest in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(7), 669–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Powell, R. R., & Garcia, J. (1985). The portrayal of minorities and women in selected elementary science series. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(6), 519–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pozzer, L. L., & Roth, W. M. (2003). Prevalence, function and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(10), 1089–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pozzer, L. L., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Making sense of photographs. Science & Education, 89, 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Robottom, I., & Hart, P. (1993). Research in environmental education: Engaging the debate. Geelong: Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Roth, W. M., Bowen, G. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1999). Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 977–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ruskey, A., Wilke, R., & Beasley, T. (2001). A survey of the status of state-level environmental education in the United States. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32, 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schizas, D. G., & Stamou, G. P. (2005). Network rethinking of nature and society. Ludus Vitalis, 24, 55–82.Google Scholar
  43. Searle, J. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free.Google Scholar
  44. Short, J. (1991). Imagined country: Society, culture and environment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Stylianidou, F., & Ogborn, J. (2002). Analysis of science textbook pictures about energy and pupils’ reading of them. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 257–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Taylor, P. (1988). Technocratic optimism, H.T.Odum, and the partial transformation of ecological metaphor after World War II. Journal of the History of Biology, 21, 213–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Titscher, S., Meyer, M., Wodak, R., & Vetter, E. (2000). Methods of text and discourse analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Urry, J. (2005). The complexities of the global. Theory, Culture & Society, 22(5), 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van den Born, R., Lenders, R., Groot, W., & Huijsman, E. (2001). The new biophilia: an exploration of visions of nature in western countries. Environmental Conservation, 25, 65–75.Google Scholar
  50. Van Koppen, C. S. A. (2000). Resource, arcadia, lifeworld: nature concepts in environmental sociology. Sociologia Ruralis, 40, 300–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu, H. K., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Inscriptional practices in two inquiry-based classrooms: a case study of seventh graders’ use of data tables and graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 63–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rea Lemoni
    • 1
  • Anastasia G. Stamou
    • 2
    Email author
  • George P. Stamou
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Natural Resources ManagementUniversity of Ioannina, GreeceIoanninaGreece
  2. 2.Department of Early Childhood EducationUniversity of Western MacedoniaFlorinaGreece
  3. 3.School of Biology, Department of EcologyAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations