Research in Science Education

, Volume 39, Issue 5, pp 661–680 | Cite as

Australian Secondary Students’ Views About Global Warming: Beliefs About Actions, and Willingness to Act



A 44-item questionnaire was constructed to determine secondary students’ views about how useful various specific actions might be at reducing global warming, their willingness to undertake the various actions, and the extent to which these two might be linked. Responses (n = 500) were obtained from students in years 7 to 10 in three schools in NSW, Australia. For some pro-environmental actions, the degree to which students professed a willingness to act was greater than might be expected from the extent to which they believed the action to be useful. Such actions are those that involve minimal inconvenience such as switching off un-used electrical appliances, or those that are becoming well embedded in social practice, such as recycling. For other pro-environmental actions, the degree to which students were willing to act seemed less than might be expected, given the extent to which they believed the action to be useful. Actions concerning personal transport, such as buying smaller cars or using public rather than private transport, and obtaining more electricity from nuclear power stations, fell into this category. Here, there are disincentives to acting in a pro-environmental manner relating to personal inconvenience, or concern about nuclear power. The data were also explored to determine the strength of the relationships, for each action, between students’ professed willingness to act and their belief that an action would be effective. This suggested a measure of the potential effectiveness of education about that action. For some actions, this relationship was weak; in such cases, altering belief about the usefulness of the action might not be expected to produce major changes in behaviour. Issues concerning public transport were of this type; clearly, for issues such as these, other approaches and/or inducements may be needed to persuade people to adopt pro-environmental behaviour patterns. For other actions the relationship was stronger, so that in these areas environmental education could well be effective, especially if a large proportion of the population are not already willing to undertake that action.


Global warming Environmental education Secondary students’ beliefs Secondary students’ actions 


  1. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1981). Self referent thought: A development analysis of self-efficacy. In J. H. Flavell, & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development frontiers and possible futures (pp. 200–239). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1993). The ‘greenhouse effect’: children’s perceptions of causes, consequences, and cures. International Journal of Science Education, 15(5), 531–552. doi:10.1080/0950069930150507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (1997). Children’s models of understanding of two major global issues (ozone layer and greenhouse effect). Research in Science & Technological Education, 15(1), 19–28. doi:10.1080/0263514970150102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2001). Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose? School students’ ideas about the ‘greenhouse effect’ a decade on. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6, 77–101.Google Scholar
  6. Boyes, E., Stanisstreet, M., Skamp, K., Rodriguez, M., Fortner, R., & Malandrakis, G. (2008, April). Sustainable development: Doing what you believe to be helpful for global warming. Paper to the American Education Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  7. Brody, M. (2005). Learning in nature. Environmental Education Research, 11(5), 603–621. doi:10.1080/13504620500169809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carrington, B., & Troyna, B. (1988). Children and controversial issues: Strategies for the early and middle years. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clover, D. (2002). Traversing the gap: concientizacion. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 315–323. doi:10.1080/13504620220145465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Courtenay-Hall, P., & Rogers, L. (2002). Gaps in mind: problems in environmental education knowledge/behaviour modelling research. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 283–297. doi:10.1080/13504620220145438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devine-Wright, P., Devine-Wright, H., & Fleming, P. (2004). Situational influences upon children’s beliefs about global warming and energy. Environmental Education Research, 10(4), 493–505. doi:10.1080/1350462042000291029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dietz, T., & Stern, P. (Eds.). (2002). New tools for environmental protection: Education, information and voluntary measures. Washington, DC: US National Academy of Science.Google Scholar
  13. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  14. Fortner, R., Lee, J., Corney, J., Romanello, S., Bonnell, J., Luthy, B., et al. (2000). Public understanding of climate change: certainty and willingness to act. Environmental Education Research, 6(2), 127–141. doi:10.1080/713664673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Henderson, K., & Tilbury, D. (2004). Whole-school approaches to sustainability: An international review of whole-school sustainability programs. Report prepared by Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability for the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australian Government. Retrieved September 17, 2007, from
  16. Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hudson, P., Skamp, K., & Brookes, L. (2005). Development of an instrument: mentoring for effective primary science teaching. Science Education, 89(4), 657–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (1997). Executive Summary of the North American Chapter on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2001). Third Assessment Report. Retrieved May 23, 2007, from
  20. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) Retrieved November 15, 2007, from
  21. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. New York: IPCC/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. International Union for Health Promotion and Education (2000). The evidence of health promotion effectiveness: A report to the European Commission (2nd ed.). Brussels: ECSC-EC-EAEC.Google Scholar
  23. Jenkins, E., & Pell, R. (2006). Me and the environmental challenges: a survey of English secondary school students’ attitudes towards the environment. International Journal of Science Education, 28(7), 765–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jensen, R. (2002). Knowledge, action and pro-environmental behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaiser, F., Wolfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kalinowski, C. M. (2006). Recycling as a reflection of balanced self-interest. Environment and Behaviour, 38(3), 333–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lenzen, M., & Murray, J. (2001). The role of equity and lifestyles in education about climate change: experiences from a large-scale teacher development program. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(Spring), 32–51.Google Scholar
  29. Lenzen, M., & Smith, S. (1999/2000). Teaching responsibility for climate change: three neglected issues. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 15/16, 65–76.Google Scholar
  30. Metzger, T., & McEwen, D. (1999). Measurement of environmental sensitivity. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(4), 38–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. NSW Council for EE (NSW CEE) (2006). Learning for sustainability. Sydney: NSW Council for Environmental Education.Google Scholar
  32. NSW Department of Environment and Conservation. (2006). Sydney: NSW DEC. Retrieved September 19, 2007, from
  33. Nutbeam, D., & Harris, E. (2004). Theory in a nutshell. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  34. Posch, P. (1993). Research issues in environmental education. Studies in Science Education, 21, 21–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pruneau, D., Doyon, A., Langis, J., Vasseur, L., Ouellet, E., McLaughlin, E., et al. (2007). When teachers adopt environmental behaviours in the aim of protecting the climate. Journal of Environmental Education, 37(3), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rajecki, D. W. (1982). Attitudes: Themes and advances. Sunderland, MA: Sinnauer.Google Scholar
  37. ROSE Project. (2004). Relevance of Science Education project. Retrieved June 10, 2006, from http://www/
  38. Rye, J. A., Rubba, P. A., & Weisenmayer, R. L. (1997). An investigation into middle school students’ alternative conceptions of global warming. International Journal of Science Education, 19(5), 527–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schreiner, C., Henriksen, E., & Kirkeby Hansen, P. (2005). Climate education: empowering today’s youth to meet tomorrow’s challenges. Studies in Science Education, 41, 3–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scott, W., & Gough, N. (2003). Sustainable development and learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  41. Silvek, D. J., & Hungerford, H. (1989). Predictors of responsible behaviour in members of three Wisconsin conservation organisations. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(2), 35–40.Google Scholar
  42. Skamp, K., Bergmann, I., Taplin, R., & Cooke, K. (2007). A review of air quality community education. Sydney: ARIES.Google Scholar
  43. Smyth, J. (2006). Environment and education: a view of a changing scene. Environmental Education Research, 12(3), 247–264 (Reprinted from Environmental Education on Research, 1(1), 3–20).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sterling, S. (2004). Linking thinking. Perthshire, Scotland: World Wildlife Fund-Scotland.Google Scholar
  45. Stern, N. (2006). What is the economics of climate changes? Retrieved June 20, 2007, from
  46. Summers, M., Childs, A., & Corney, G. (2005). Education for sustainable development in initial teacher training: issues for interdisciplinary collaboration. Environmental Education Review, 11(5), 623–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. The NSW Greenhouse Office. (2005). NSW greenhouse plan. Sydney: NSW Government. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from
  48. Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J., & Novak, J. (1995). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  49. Whitehouse, H. (2006). Climate change—a burning curriculum issue. Primary and Middle Years Educator, 4(2), 30–34.Google Scholar
  50. Wylie, J., Sheehy, N., McGuinness, C., & Orhard, G. (1998). Children’s thinking about air pollution: a systems theory analysis. Environmental Education Research, 4(2), 117–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yencken, D. (2000). Young people and the environment: The implications for environmentaliam. In D. Yencken, J. Fien, & H. Sykes (Eds.),Environment, education and society in the Asia-Pacific: Local traditions and global discourses (pp. 212–250). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward Boyes
    • 2
  • Keith Skamp
    • 1
  • Martin Stanisstreet
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Children and Young People, School of EducationSouthern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia
  2. 2.Environmental Education Research UnitUniversity of LiverpoolLiverpoolUK

Personalised recommendations