Australian Secondary Students’ Views About Global Warming: Beliefs About Actions, and Willingness to Act
A 44-item questionnaire was constructed to determine secondary students’ views about how useful various specific actions might be at reducing global warming, their willingness to undertake the various actions, and the extent to which these two might be linked. Responses (n = 500) were obtained from students in years 7 to 10 in three schools in NSW, Australia. For some pro-environmental actions, the degree to which students professed a willingness to act was greater than might be expected from the extent to which they believed the action to be useful. Such actions are those that involve minimal inconvenience such as switching off un-used electrical appliances, or those that are becoming well embedded in social practice, such as recycling. For other pro-environmental actions, the degree to which students were willing to act seemed less than might be expected, given the extent to which they believed the action to be useful. Actions concerning personal transport, such as buying smaller cars or using public rather than private transport, and obtaining more electricity from nuclear power stations, fell into this category. Here, there are disincentives to acting in a pro-environmental manner relating to personal inconvenience, or concern about nuclear power. The data were also explored to determine the strength of the relationships, for each action, between students’ professed willingness to act and their belief that an action would be effective. This suggested a measure of the potential effectiveness of education about that action. For some actions, this relationship was weak; in such cases, altering belief about the usefulness of the action might not be expected to produce major changes in behaviour. Issues concerning public transport were of this type; clearly, for issues such as these, other approaches and/or inducements may be needed to persuade people to adopt pro-environmental behaviour patterns. For other actions the relationship was stronger, so that in these areas environmental education could well be effective, especially if a large proportion of the population are not already willing to undertake that action.
KeywordsGlobal warming Environmental education Secondary students’ beliefs Secondary students’ actions
- Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behaviour. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1981). Self referent thought: A development analysis of self-efficacy. In J. H. Flavell, & L. Ross (Eds.), Social cognitive development frontiers and possible futures (pp. 200–239). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Boyes, E., & Stanisstreet, M. (2001). Plus ca change, plus c’est la meme chose? School students’ ideas about the ‘greenhouse effect’ a decade on. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6, 77–101.Google Scholar
- Boyes, E., Stanisstreet, M., Skamp, K., Rodriguez, M., Fortner, R., & Malandrakis, G. (2008, April). Sustainable development: Doing what you believe to be helpful for global warming. Paper to the American Education Research Association (AERA) Annual Meeting, New York, NY.Google Scholar
- Carrington, B., & Troyna, B. (1988). Children and controversial issues: Strategies for the early and middle years. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
- Dietz, T., & Stern, P. (Eds.). (2002). New tools for environmental protection: Education, information and voluntary measures. Washington, DC: US National Academy of Science.Google Scholar
- Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
- Henderson, K., & Tilbury, D. (2004). Whole-school approaches to sustainability: An international review of whole-school sustainability programs. Report prepared by Australian Research Institute in Education for Sustainability for the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Australian Government. Retrieved September 17, 2007, from http://www.aries.mq.edu.au/pdf/international_review.pdf.
- IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (1997). Executive Summary of the North American Chapter on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2001). Third Assessment Report. Retrieved May 23, 2007, from http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc_tar.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) Retrieved November 15, 2007, from http://www.ipc.ch/.
- International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001). Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. New York: IPCC/Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- International Union for Health Promotion and Education (2000). The evidence of health promotion effectiveness: A report to the European Commission (2nd ed.). Brussels: ECSC-EC-EAEC.Google Scholar
- Lenzen, M., & Murray, J. (2001). The role of equity and lifestyles in education about climate change: experiences from a large-scale teacher development program. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6(Spring), 32–51.Google Scholar
- Lenzen, M., & Smith, S. (1999/2000). Teaching responsibility for climate change: three neglected issues. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 15/16, 65–76.Google Scholar
- NSW Council for EE (NSW CEE) (2006). Learning for sustainability. Sydney: NSW Council for Environmental Education.Google Scholar
- NSW Department of Environment and Conservation. (2006). Sydney: NSW DEC. Retrieved September 19, 2007, from http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/whocares/whocares2006.htm.
- Nutbeam, D., & Harris, E. (2004). Theory in a nutshell. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Rajecki, D. W. (1982). Attitudes: Themes and advances. Sunderland, MA: Sinnauer.Google Scholar
- ROSE Project. (2004). Relevance of Science Education project. Retrieved June 10, 2006, from http://www/ils.uio.no/forskning/rose.
- Scott, W., & Gough, N. (2003). Sustainable development and learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
- Silvek, D. J., & Hungerford, H. (1989). Predictors of responsible behaviour in members of three Wisconsin conservation organisations. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(2), 35–40.Google Scholar
- Skamp, K., Bergmann, I., Taplin, R., & Cooke, K. (2007). A review of air quality community education. Sydney: ARIES.Google Scholar
- Sterling, S. (2004). Linking thinking. Perthshire, Scotland: World Wildlife Fund-Scotland.Google Scholar
- Stern, N. (2006). What is the economics of climate changes? Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/media/213/42/What_is_the_Economics_of_Climate_Change.pdf.
- The NSW Greenhouse Office. (2005). NSW greenhouse plan. Sydney: NSW Government. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from http://www.greenhouseinfo.nsw.gov.au.
- Wandersee, J., Mintzes, J., & Novak, J. (1995). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Whitehouse, H. (2006). Climate change—a burning curriculum issue. Primary and Middle Years Educator, 4(2), 30–34.Google Scholar
- Yencken, D. (2000). Young people and the environment: The implications for environmentaliam. In D. Yencken, J. Fien, & H. Sykes (Eds.),Environment, education and society in the Asia-Pacific: Local traditions and global discourses (pp. 212–250). London: Routledge.Google Scholar