Research in Science Education

, Volume 38, Issue 4, pp 501–527 | Cite as

Engaging Students in Science Across the Primary Secondary Interface: Listening to the Students’ Voice

Article

Abstract

Most studies indicate primary students’ attitudes towards and interest in science decline as they progress into the secondary years. Longitudinal qualitative research exploring this phenomenon is rare as is research which focuses on the students’ voice as they cross the interface. In this study multiple qualitative data sources, supported by a ‘science interest’ composite scale, followed 20 students over 2 years. In contrast to baseline data on their peers these students, in general, maintained their interest in science. Apart from identifying the teacher’s pedagogical approach and classroom environment as two key issues in understanding these students’ journeys, the importance of listening to and heeding the students’ voice may be an even more critical concern in addressing the decline in students’ attitudes and interest in science.

Keywords

Attitudes towards science Interest in science Primary–secondary transition Students’ voice 

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science Education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andre, T., Whigham, M., Hendrickson, A., & Chambers, S. (1999). Competency beliefs, positive affect, and gender stereotypes of elementary students and their parents about science versus other school subjects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(6), 719–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anfara, V. A. J., Brown, K. M., & Mangione, T. L. (2002). Qualitative analysis on stage: Making the research process more public. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 28–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arnold, J. (2006). Science education in primary schools: A socio-cultural approach to a persistent problem. Unpublished paper presented at the 37th conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Canberra, ACT.Google Scholar
  5. Baird, J. R., Gunstone, R. F., Penna, C., Fensham, P. J., & White, R. T. (1990). Researching balance between cognition and affect in science teaching and learning. Research in Science Education, 20, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  7. Braund, M., & Driver, M. (2005). Pupils’ perceptions of practical science in primary and secondary school: implications for improving progression and continuity of learning. Educational Research, 47(1), 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Braund, M., & Hames, V. (2005). Improving progression and continuity from primary to secondary science: Pupils’ reactions to bridging work. International Journal of Science Education, 27(7), 781–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bybee, R. W., & DeBoer, G. E. (1995). Research on goals for the science curriculum. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research in science teaching and learning (pp. 357– 387). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  10. Cleaves, A. (2005). The formation of science choices in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 471–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colley, A., Comber, C., & Hargreaves, D. J. (1994). Gender effects in school subject preferences: A research note. Educational Research, 20(1), 13–18.Google Scholar
  12. Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Sydney, NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  13. Darby, L. (2005). Science students’ perception of engaging pedagogy. Research in Science Education, 35(4), 425–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ebenezer, J. V., & Zoller, U. (1993). Grade 10 students’ perceptions of and attitudes toward science teaching and school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 175–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feasey, R. (2004). Thinking and working scientifically. In K. Skamp (Ed.), Teaching primary science constructively (2nd ed.) (pp. 44–87). Melbourne, Victoria: Thomson.Google Scholar
  16. Ferguson, P. D., & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Student gender, school size and changing perceptions of science learning environments during the transition form primary to secondary school. Research in Science Education, 28(4), 387–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraser, B. J. (1995). Research on classroom and school climate. In D. Gabel (Ed.) Handbook of research in science teaching and learning (pp. 493–541). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  18. Gerber, B. L. (2001). Relationships among informal learning environments, teaching procedures and scientific reasoning ability. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 535–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. Vermont, VI: Longman.Google Scholar
  20. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. J. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. Canberra, ACT: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
  21. Greene, M. (1986). Philosophy and Teaching. In M. C. Wittrock. Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.) (pp. 479–501). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  22. Hand, B., Wallace, C., & Yang, E. M. (2004). Using a science writing heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh-grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 121–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanrahan, M. (2006a). Highlighting hybridity: A critical discourse analysis of teacher talk in science classrooms. Science Education, 90(1), 8–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanrahan, M. (2006b). The art and science of “recognition of difference” in junior secondary science classrooms. In W. Bokhorst-Heng, M. D. Osborne, & K. Lee (Eds.) Redesigning pedagogy: Reflections on theory and praxis (pp. 271–281). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Harlen, W. (2003). How high stakes testing impacts on motivation for learning. Science Teacher Education, 37, 2–7.Google Scholar
  26. Harlen, W., & Wake, R. (1999). Effective teaching of science: A review of 1999. Edinburgh, Scotland: The Scottish Council for Research in Education.Google Scholar
  27. Hasan, O. E. (1985). An investigation into factors affecting attitudes toward science of secondary school students in Jordan. Science Education, 69(1), 3–18.Google Scholar
  28. Hendley, D., Parkinson, J., Stables, A., & Tanner, H. (1995). Gender differences in pupil attitudes to the national curriculum foundation subjects of English, mathematics, science and technology in Key Stage 3 in South Wales. Educational Studies, 21(1), 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoffman, J., Hsin-Kai, W., Krajcik, J., & Solaway, E. (2003). The nature of middle school learners’ science content understandings with the use of online resources. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(3), 323–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hoppe, M., Wells, E., Morrison, D., Gillmore, M., & Wilsdon, A. (1995). Using focus groups to discuss sensitive topics with children. Evaluation Review, 19(1), 102–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jarman, R. (1990). Primary science–secondary science continuity: A new era? School Science Review, 71(257), 19–29.Google Scholar
  32. Jenkins, E. W., & Pell, R. G. (2006). The relevance of science education project (ROSE) in England: a summary of findings. Leeds, UK: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
  33. Jo, K., & Song, J. (2003). Why do you study science in school? The changes of students’ views throughout the middle school period. Unpublished paper presented at the Australasian Science Education Research Association Conference Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar
  34. Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in students’ experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84, 180–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jovanovic, J., & Steinbach King, S. (1998). Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: Who’s doing the performing? American Educational Research Journal, 35(3), 477–496.Google Scholar
  36. Keogh, B., Naylor, S., & Downing, B. (2007). Argumentation and primary science. Research in Science Education, 37(1), 17–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Keogh, B., Naylor, S., Downing, B., Maloney, J., & Simon, S. (2006). Puppets bring stories to life in science. Primary Science Review, 92, 26–28.Google Scholar
  38. Kobella, T. R. J. (1989). Changing and measuring attitudes in the science classroom. Research matters – To the Science Teacher, 8901. Retrieved July 5, 2003 from http://www.educ.sfu.ca/narstsite/publications/research/attitude.htm.
  39. Leach, J. (2002). Teachers’ views on the future of the secondary curriculum. School Science Review, 83(304), 43–50.Google Scholar
  40. Lindahl, B. (2003). Pupils’ responses to school science and technology? A longitudinal study of pathways to upper secondary school. Unpublished Summary of PhD thesis, University of Gothenburg, Kristianstad, Norway.Google Scholar
  41. Logan, M., & Skamp, K. (2005). Students’ interest in science across the middle-school years. Teaching Science, 51(4), 8–15.Google Scholar
  42. Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Smith, T. A., Chrostowski, S. J., et al. (2000). TIMSS 1999 International Science Report Findings from IEA’s Repeat of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study at the Eighth Grade: The International Study Center. Boston College, Lynch School of Education, The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Retrieved July 20, 2006 from Timms 1999 Publications: http://timss.bc.edu/timss1999i/science_achievement_report.html.
  43. McCrory Wallace, R. M., Kuppermann, J., & Krajcik, J. (2000). Science on the web: Students online in a sixth grade classroom. Journal of Learning Sciences, 9(1), 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  45. Metherell, M. (2006, July 19). Where are all the scientists? Sydney Morning Herald. Fairfax Digital. Retrieved September 19, 2006 from http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/where-are-all-the-scientists/2006/07/18/1153166381973.html.
  46. Millar, R., & Obsborne, J. (1998). Beyond 2000: Science education for the future. Report of a seminar series funded by the Nuffield Foundation. London: Kings College Press.Google Scholar
  47. Murphy, C. (2003). Report 5: Literature review in primary science and ICT. Belfast, Northern Ireland: Queen’s University.Google Scholar
  48. Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2003). Children’s perceptions of school science. School Science Review, 84(308), 109–116.Google Scholar
  49. Murray, I., & Reiss, M. (2005). The student review of the science curriculum. School Science Review, 87(318), 83–93.Google Scholar
  50. Neuman, W. (2000). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Sydney, NSW: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  51. Osborne, J., & Collins, S. (2000). Pupil’s and parents’ views of the school science curriculum. School Science Review, 82(928), 23–31.Google Scholar
  52. Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994–1020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Palmer, D. (1999). Students’ perceptions of high quality science teaching. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 45(3), 41–44.Google Scholar
  55. Pell, R. G., & Jarvis, T. (2001). Developing attitude to science scales for use with children aged from five to eleven years. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), 847–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Qualter, A. (1993). I would like to know more about that: A study of the interest shown by girls and boys in scientific topics. International Journal of Science Education, 15(3), 307–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ramsden, J. D. (1998). Mission impossible?: Can anything be done about attitudes to science? International Journal of Science Education, 20(2), 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reiss, M. (2000). Understanding science lessons. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Rennie, L. J., Goodrum, D., & Hackling, M. (2001). Science teaching and learning in Australian schools: Results of a national study. Research in Science Education, 31, 455–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rigano, D. L., & Ritchie, S. M. (2006). Merging science and literacy learning: Development of conceptual understanding. Unpublished paper presented at the annual conference of the Australian Science Education Research Association, Canberra, ACT.Google Scholar
  61. Rothapfel, J. (2004). The importance of switching our students onto science. Teaching Science, 50(2), 24–27.Google Scholar
  62. Simon, S. (Ed.). (2000). Students’ attitudes towards science. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Simpson, R. D., Koballa, T. R. J., Oliver, J. S., & Crawley, F. E. (1995). Research on the affective dimension of science learning. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research in science teaching and learning (pp. 211–234). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  64. Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1985). Attitude toward science and achievement motivation profiles of male and female science students in grades six through ten. Science Education, 69(4), 511–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education, 74(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith, M. (2003). Research methods in accounting. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  67. Speering, W., & Rennie, L. (1996). Students’ perceptions about science: The impact of transition from primary school to secondary school. Research in Science Education, 26(3), 283–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Talton, E. L., & Simpson, R. D. (1985). Relationships between peer and individual attitudes towards science among adolescent students. Science Education, 69(1), 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: Engaging students in science for Australia’s future. Camberwell, Victoria: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  70. White, R. T. (1988). Learning science. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Google Scholar
  71. Whitten, M., Tuck, B., & Haigh, M. (2003). Investigating student attitudes to science before and after transition from primary school to secondary school. Unpublished paper presented at the 34th annual conference of the Australasian Science Education Research Association, Melbourne, Victoria.Google Scholar
  72. Wolcott, H. (1992). Qualitative research in education. In M. LeCompte, W. Millroy, & J. Priessle (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 4–52). SanDiego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  73. Woolnough, B. E. (1994). Effective science teaching. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Southern Cross UniversityLismoreAustralia

Personalised recommendations