Research in Science Education

, Volume 38, Issue 3, pp 261–284 | Cite as

Revisiting the Conceptualisation of Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK): PCK as a Conceptual Tool to Understand Teachers as Professionals

  • Soonhye ParkEmail author
  • J. Steve Oliver


The purpose of this study was to rethink the conceptualization of pedagogical content knowledge based on our descriptive research findings and to show how this new conceptualization helps us to understand teachers as professionals. This study was a multiple case study grounded in a social constructivist framework. Data were collected from multiple sources and analysed using three approaches: (a) constant comparative method, (b) enumerative approach, and (c) in-depth analysis of explicit PCK. The results indicated that (a) PCK was developed through reflection-in-action and reflection-on-action within given instructional contexts, (b) teacher efficacy emerged as an affective affiliate of PCK, (c) students had an important impact on PCK development, (d) students’ misconceptions played a significant role in shaping PCK, and (e) PCK was idiosyncratic in some aspects of its enactment. Discussion centres on how these five aspects are related to teacher professionalism.


Knowledge for teaching Knowledge of student understanding Pedagogical content knowledge Reflection in/on action Teacher efficacy Teacher professionalism 



This research was supported by a grant from the Department of Education. However, the contents of this article do not necessarily represent the policy of the Department of Education, and you should not assume endorsement by the US Federal Government.


  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. Washington, DC: AAAS.Google Scholar
  2. Appleton, K. (2006). Science pedagogical content knowledge and elementary school teachers. In K. Appleton (Ed.), Elementary science teacher education: International perspectives on contemporary issues and practice (pp. 31–54). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that preservice teachers bring to teacher education. Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  6. Baxter, J. A., & Lederman, N. G. (1999). Assessment and measurement of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp.147–161). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  7. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. T. (1996). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Brookhart, S. M., & Freeman, D. J. (1992). Characteristics of entering teacher candidates. Review of Educational Research, 62(1), 37–60.Google Scholar
  9. Bullough, R. V., Jr. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge circa 1907 and 1987: A study in the history of an idea. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 655–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709–725). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Carter, K. (1990). Teachers’ knowledge and learning to teach. In W. R. Houston & M. H. J. Sikula (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 291–310). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. A. (1993). Pedagogical content knowledge: An integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44, 263–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  15. Dewey, J. (1902/1983). The child and the curriculum. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The middle works, 1899–1924: Vol. 2: 1902–1903. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Donnelly, J. F. (2001). School science teaching as a profession: Past, present, and future. School Science Review, 82(300), 31–39.Google Scholar
  17. Elbaz, F. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
  18. Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fernandez-Balboa, J. M., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Geddis, A. N., Onslow, B., Beynon, C., & Oesch, J. (1993). Transforming content knowledge: Learning to teach about isotopes. Science Education, 77(6), 575–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  22. Guskey, T. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hashweh, M. Z. (2005). Teacher pedagogical constructions: a reconfiguration of pedagogical content knowledge. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(3), 273–292.Google Scholar
  24. Janesick, V. J. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research design (pp. 209–219). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks Principle. Review of Educational Research, 60(3), 419–469.Google Scholar
  26. Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. LeCompte, M. D., & Preissle, J. (Eds.) (1993). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data. In Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed., pp. 234–278). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  28. Leinhardt, G., & Smith, D. (1985). Expertise in mathematics instruction: Subject matter knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 247–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Loughran, J., Berry, A., & Mulhall, P. (2006). Understanding and developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  30. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, L., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  31. Marks, R. (1990). Pedagogical content knowledge: From a mathematical case to a modified conception. Journal of Teacher Education, 41, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. National Research Council (NRC) (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  33. Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Novak, J. D. (1993). How do we learn our lessons? The Science Teacher, 60(3), 50–55.Google Scholar
  35. Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–332.Google Scholar
  36. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula, T. J. Buttery, & E. Guyton (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102–119). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Ross, J. A. (1995). Strategies for enhancing teachers’ beliefs in their effectiveness: Research on a school improvement hypothesis. Teachers College Record, 97, 227–251.Google Scholar
  38. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  39. Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4–14.Google Scholar
  41. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stein, M. K., & Wang, M. C. (1988). Teacher development and school improvement: The process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 171–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Tournaki, N., & Podell, D. M. (2005). The impact of student characteristics and teacher efficacy on teachers’ predictions of student success. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 299–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Veal, W. R., & MaKinster, J. G. (1999). Pedagogical content knowledge taxonomies. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 3(4). Retrieved February, 26, 2003, from
  48. Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, E. R. (1987). ‘150 different ways’ of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring teachers’ thinking (pp. 104–124). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  49. Woolfolk, A. E., Rosoff, B., & Hoy, W. K. (1990). Teachers’ sense of efficacy and their beliefs about managing students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 6, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Teaching and LearningUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  2. 2.Mathematics and Science EducationUniversity of GeorgiaAthensGreece

Personalised recommendations