The role of aesthetic experiences for learning was examined in elementary school science. Numerous authors have argued for a science education also involving aesthetic experiences, but few have examined what this means empirically. Recordings of children’s talk with each other and with the teacher during hands-on activities in nine different science units were made. How the children and teachers used aesthetic judgements and how these judgements were part of aesthetic experiences of the science assignments were analysed. For the analysis a pragmatist perspective was used, especially drawing on Dewey and the later Wittgenstein. The results showed how aesthetic judgements occurred in moments of anticipation and moments when the science activities were brought to fulfilment. In this way children used aesthetic judgements normatively about what belonged in science class and what to include and exclude. In this way aesthetic judgements were an important part of learning how to proceed in science class. In using aesthetic judgements the children also talked about their own place in science class and whether they belonged there or not. In this way aesthetic experience is tightly related to learning science as participation. Learning science also meant learning a special kind of aesthetics, that is, learning how to distinguish the science context from other contexts. The fact that children liked or disliked something outside school did not necessarily mean that it was experienced aesthetically in the same way in school, but needed to be re-learnt. What these results mean for science education is discussed at length. The connection between aesthetics and learning to observe is also briefly discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
“Carbonic acid” [kolsyra] is a literal translation of the words children used to describe this phenomenon. We have chosen this literal translation because the everyday expression that is used in Swedish to say that a beverage is “carbonated” is to say that it is “with carbonic acid.” So it is natural for Swedish children to name bubbles that appear in water as “carbonic acid,” although the term has no meaning as to the chemical composition of the bubbles.
The original Swedish word Nicolai used was “pyssla,” which has a connotation of tinkering in a cosy way. We have found no corresponding word in English.
Alsop, S., & Watts, M. (2003). Science education and affect. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1043–1047.
Bloom, J. D. (1992). The development of scientific knowledge in elementary school children: A context of meaning perspective. Science Education, 76, 399–413.
Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
Brickhouse, N. W., Lowery, P., & Schultz, K. (2000). What kind of a girl does science? The construction of school science identities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 441–458.
Cobern, W. W., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1998). Cultural aspects of learning science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Dewey, J. (1934/1980). Art as experience. New York: Perigee Books.
Dewey, J. (1938/1997). Experience & education. New York: Touchstone.
Gardner, H. (1971). Problem-solving in the arts and sciences. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 5, 93–113.
Girod, M., & Wong, D. (2002). An aesthetic (Deweyan) perspective on science learning: Case studies of three fourth grades. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 199–224.
Jakobson, B., & Wickman, P.-O. (2007). Transformation through language use: Children’s spontaneous metaphors in elementary school science. Science & Education (in press).
Lave, J. (1996). The practice of learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lemke, J. L. (2001). Articulating communities: Sociocultural perspectives on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 296–316.
Lidar, M., Lundqvist, E., & Östman, L. (2006). Teaching and learning in the science classroom: The interplay between teachers’ epistemological moves and students’ practical epistemology. Science Education, 90, 148–163.
McClure, A. A., & Zitlow, C. S. (1991). Not just the facts: Aesthetic response in elementary content area studies. Language Arts, 68, 27–33.
Mortimer, E. F., & Scott, P. H. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
Novak, J. D. (2002). Meaningful learning: The essential factor for conceptual change in limited or inappropriate propositional hierarchies leading to empowerment of learners. Science Education, 86, 548–571.
Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accomodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Root-Bernstein, R. S. (1989). Discovering. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Roth, W.-M., & Lucas, K. B. (1997). From “truth” to “invented reality”: A discourse analysis of high school physics students’ talk about scientific knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 145–179.
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1992). A revisionist theory of conceptual change. In R. A. Duschl & R. J. Hamilton (Eds.), Philosophy of science, cognitive psychology and educational theory and practice (pp. 147–176). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Szybek, P. (1999). Staging science. Some aspects of the production and distribution of science knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Säljö, R., & Bergqvist, K. (1997). Seeing the light: Discourse and practice in the optics lab. In L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, & B. Burge (Eds.), Discourse, tools, and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 385–405). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Tauber, A. I. (Ed.) (1996). The elusive synthesis: Aesthetics and science. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Wertsch, J. V. (1995). The need for action in sociocultural research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
West, L. H. T., & Pines, A. L. (1983). How “rational” is rationality? Science Education, 67, 37–39.
Wickman, P.-O. (2004). The practical epistemologies of the classroom: A study of laboratory work. Science Education, 88, 325–344.
Wickman, P.-O. (2006). Aesthetic experience in science education: Learning and meaning-making as situated talk and action. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002a). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86, 601–623.
Wickman, P.-O., & Östman, L. (2002b). Induction as an empirical problem: How students generalize during practical work. International Journal of Science Education, 24, 465–486.
Wittgenstein, L. (1966). Lectures and conversations on aesthetics, psychology and religious belief. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Wong, D., Pugh, K., & the Dewey Ideas Group at Michigan State University. (2001). Learning science: A Deweyan perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 317–336.
About this article
Cite this article
Jakobson, B., Wickman, P. The Roles of Aesthetic Experience in Elementary School Science. Res Sci Educ 38, 45–65 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9039-8
- Aesthetic experience
- Elementary school
- Science learning