Research in Science Education

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 235–268

Pedagogical Content Knowledge Development and Pre-Service Physics Teacher Education: A Case Study

Article

Abstract

This paper addresses the question of how to develop prospective teachers' pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in science teacher education. The main focus is on the knowledge transformation process and on the cognitive strategies used to shift prospective teachers' explanations within the domain of modelling thermal physical phenomena. This study investigates the development of PCK within a group of 28 pre-service physics teachers during the first semester of their two-year post-graduate teacher education program. It focuses on the central issue of the relationships between observable phenomena, like macroscopic thermal properties of matter and their interpretation and/or explanation in terms of corpuscular characteristics and/or thermodynamics theory. The strategy is based on the consideration that knowledge transformation is not a one-way process from subject matter knowledge to pedagogical content knowledge, as literature suggests, but a bidirectional process involving deepening of subject matter knowledge and increasing awareness of pedagogical issues.

Key Words

modelling pedagogical content knowledge science teachers' professional knowledge science teaching and learning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiello-Nicosia, M. L., & Sperandeo-Mineo, R. M. (2000). Educational reconstruction of the physics content to be taught and pre-service teacher training. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1085–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Clement, J. (2000). Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1041–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dillon, C. (1994). Qualitative reasoning about physical systems – an overview. Studies in Science Education, 23, 39–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duit, R., & Komorek, M. (1997). Understanding the basic ideas of chaos theory in a study of limited predictability. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 247–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duit, R., Roth, W. M., Komorek, M., & Wilbers, J. (1998). Conceptual change cum discourse analysis to understand cognition in a unit on chaotic systems: Towards an integrative perspective on learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1059–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engel-Clough, E., & Driver, R. (1985). Secondary students' conceptions of conduction of heat: Bringing together personal and scientific views. Physics Education, 69, 176–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. A new area of cognitive development inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gentner, D., & Stevens, A. L. (1983). Mental models. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Giere, R. (1990). Explaining science: A cognitive approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations: Part 1, horses for courses? International Journal of Science Education, 20, 83–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hestenes, D. (1992). Modelling games in the Newtonian world. American Journal of Physics, 60, 732–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Linder, C. J., McIntyre, C. L., Marshall, D., & Nvhodu, M. R. (1997). Physics tutors' metalearning development through an extension of Schön's reflective practice. International Journal of Science Education, 19, 821–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lijnse, P. (1995). Developmental research as a way to an empirically based ‘didactical structure of the science. Science Education, 79, 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Linn, M. C., & Songer, N. (1991). Teaching thermodynamics to middle school students: What are appropriate cognitive demands? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28, 885–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loughran, J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R., & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge through pap-ers. Research in Science Education, 31, 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources and development of pedagogical content knowledge. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  17. Marton, F. (1988). Describing and improving learning. In R. R. Schmeck (Ed.), Learning strategies and learning styles (pp. 53–82). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  18. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  19. McKinnon, A. M., & Erickson, G. L. (1988). Taking Schön's ideas to a science teaching practicum. In P. P. Grimmet & G. L. Erickson (Eds.), Reflection in teacher education (pp. 125–141). New York: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  20. Mellado, V. (1998). The classroom practice of preservice teachers and their conceptions of teaching and learning science. Science Education, 82, 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  22. Niess, M. L., & Scholz, J. M. (1999). Incorporating subject matter specific teaching strategies into secondary science teacher preparation. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge (pp. 257–276). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  23. Posner, G. L., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conceptions: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66, 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Raghaven, K., & Glaser, R. (1995). Model based analysis and reasoning in science: The MARS curriculum. Science & Education, 79, 37–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16(9), 13–20.Google Scholar
  26. Rozier, S., & Viennot, L. (1991). Students' reasoning in thermodynamics. International Journal of Science Education, 13, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scardamalia, M., Bereiter, C., & Lamon, M. (1996). The CSILE project: Trying to bring the classroom into world 3. In K. McGilly (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 201–228). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Schecker, H. (1993). Learning physics by making models. Physics Education, 28, 102–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189–215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Schön, D. A. (1988). Coaching reflective thinking. In P. P.Grimmet & G. L. Erickson (Eds.), Reflection in teacher education (pp. 113–137). New York: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  31. Shulman, L. S. (1986a). Paradigms and research programs in the study of teaching: A contemporary perspective. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 3–36). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Shulman, L. S. (1986b). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4–14.Google Scholar
  33. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  34. Shymansky, J. A., Woodworth, G., Norman, O., Dunkhase, J., Matthews, C., & Liu, C. T. (1993). A study of changes in middle school teachers' understanding of selected ideas in science as a function of an in-service program focusing on student preconceptions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 737–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Simons, P. R. J. (1996). Metacognitive strategies: Teaching and assessing. In L. W. Anderson (Ed.), International encyclopaedia of teaching and teacher education (pp. 325–342). Oxford: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  36. Sprinthall, N. A., Reiman, A. J., & Thies-Sprinthall, L. (1996). Teacher professional development. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teacher education (pp. 667–703). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Tiberghien, A., Jossem, E. L., & Barojas, J. (1998). Connecting research in physics education with teacher education. (International Commission on Physics Education Book: http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~jossem/ICPE/TOC.html)
  41. van Driel, J., De Jong, O., & Verloop, N. (2002). The development of pre service chemistry teachers' pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 86, 572–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Viennot, L. (1996). Raisonner en physique, la part du sens commun. Bruxelles: De Boeck.Google Scholar
  43. von Glasersfeld, E. (1994). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 18–27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  44. Watts, M., & Jofili, Z. (1998). Toward critical constructivistic teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 159–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. White, B. Y., Shimoda, T. A., & Fredericksen, J. R. (1999). Enabling students to construct theories of collaborative inquiry and reflective learning: Computer support for metacognitive development. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10(2), 151–182.Google Scholar
  46. Zeidler, D. L. (2002). Dancing with maggots. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13(1), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zuckerman, J. T. (1999). Student science teachers constructing practical knowledge from inservice science supervisors' stories. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(3), 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. M. Sperandeo-Mineo
    • 1
  • C. Fazio
    • 1
  • G. Tarantino
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Fisica e Tecnologie RelativeUniversitá di PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations