University and Department Influences on Scientists’ Occupational Outcomes
Over 50,000 Ph.D. degrees in Science and Engineering (S&E) are awarded annually by United States (U.S.) universities, but few studies have systematically considered how the various aspects of doctoral training can influence the occupational outcomes of S&E doctoral graduates. This inquiry draws from the National Science Foundation’s Scientists and Engineers Statistical Data System to investigate how the characteristics of U.S. degree-granting departments and institutions are associated with doctoral graduates’ entrance into different career sectors (i.e., academia, industry, government). The conceptual framework is based on the Scientific and Technical Human Capital theory (Bozeman et al. in Int J Technol Manag 22(7–8):716–740, 2001) as well as Berger and Milem’s (Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Agathon Press, New York, 2000) model of college impact. We find that a number of university and department factors are associated with the career choice of S&E doctoral graduates after finishing their Ph.D including: (a) structural characteristics, such as geographic location and faculty composition, (b) organizational behaviors, such as those symbolizing a program’s relative emphasis on traditional academic work versus activities valued in industry, and (c) peer group characteristics such as a department’s proportion of female and minority Ph.D. students. These results will be particularly informative for policy makers, faculty and administrators in S&E programs, and prospective doctoral students.
KeywordsSTEM Ph.D. students Occupational outcomes College impact Scientific and Technical Human Capital
The authors also would like to recognize additional support provided by Arizona State University’s Center for Organization Research and Design and Dr. Stuart Bretschneider.
This study was funded by the Institute for Social Science Research at Arizona State University.
- Antony, J. S., & Taylor, E. (2004). Theories and strategies of academic career socialization: Improving paths to the professoriate for black graduate students. In D. H. Wulff & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 92–114). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Ashcraft, C., & Breitzman, A. (2012). Who invents IT? Women’s participation in information technology patenting, 2012 update. Boulder, CO: National Center for Women & Information Technology.Google Scholar
- Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.Google Scholar
- Berger, J. & Milem, J. (2000). Organizational behavior in higher education and student outcomes. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. XV (pp. 268–338). Agathon Press: New York.Google Scholar
- Davis, G. (2005). Doctors without orders: Highlights of the Sigma Xi postdoc survey. American Scientist, 93 (3, Supplement).Google Scholar
- De Welde, K., & Laursen, S. (2011). The glass obstacle course: Informal and formal barriers for women Ph D students in STEM fields. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(3), 571–595.Google Scholar
- Facebook. (n.d.). Facebook fellowship program. Retrieved June 9, 2019 from https://research.fb.com/programs/fellowship/.
- Geuna, A. (Ed.). (2015). Global mobility of research scientists: The economics of who goes where and why. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Golde, C. (2006). Preparing the stewards of the discipline. In C. Golde & G. Walker (Eds.), Envisioning the future of doctoral education (pp. 3–21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Hottenrott, H., & Lawson, C. (2005). Flying the nest: How the home department shapes researchers’ career paths. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 1–19.Google Scholar
- Hottenrott, H., & Lawson, C. (2015). Flying the nest: How the home department shapes researchers’ career paths (No. 153 [rev.]). DICE Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
- Mayhew, M. J., Rockenbach, A. N., Bowman, N. A., Seifert, T. A., Wolniak, G. C., Pascarella, E. T., et al. (2016). How college affects students: 21st century evidence that higher education works (Vol. 3). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Meyers, S., & Turner, C. (2000). Faculty of color in academe: Bittersweet success. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- National Science Foundation. (2015). Science and Engineering doctorates 2015 data tables. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17306/report/.
- National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators 2018. NSB-2018-1. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/science-and-engineering-labor-force/u-s-s-e-workforce-definition-size-and-growth.
- Pellens, M., Arts, S., & Veugelers, R. (2013). Taste for science and job (mis)match of industrial researchers. In Paper presented at the DRUID Academy 2013, Rebild/Aalborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
- Sargent, J. F., Jr. (2017). The U.S. Science and engineering workforce: Recent, current, and projected employment, wages, and unemployment. Congressional Research Service, 7-5700. R43061. Retrieved from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43061.pdf.
- Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.Google Scholar
- Stephan, P. (2007). Wrapping it up in a person: The mobility patterns of new PhDs. In J. Lerner & S. Stern (Eds.), Innovation policy and the economy (Vol. 7, pp. 71–98). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
- Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of Graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Volume 28, Number 3. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar