Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Shifting Gears: Characteristics and Consequences of Latent Class Transitions in Doctoral Socialization

  • Published:
Research in Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a national sample of 336 biology Ph.D. students, this study classified students based on their interactions with faculty and peers, and investigated longitudinal changes in their interaction classifications over 3 years. We also examined associations between students’ interaction classifications, their demographic backgrounds (e.g., gender, international student status, first-generation status, and underrepresented racial/ethnic minority status), and doctoral outcomes (e.g., sense of belonging, satisfaction with academic development, institutional commitment, and scholarly productivity). The findings revealed that three distinct subgroups existed among the current sample of biology Ph.D. students, with respect to their interactions with their faculty and peers: high interaction with faculty and peers, high interaction with peers only, and low interaction with faculty and peers. However, such patterns of doctoral students’ interactions with faculty and peers tended to, in general, be stable over time. In addition, while the differential effects of demographic variables on changes in these interaction patterns were widely founded, such changes were not substantially linked to doctoral student outcomes. Implications for research on doctoral education and socialization theory are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Minority serving institutions include historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) and Hispanic-serving institutions (HSIs) for this study.

  2. The present study demographics are similar to the reported demographics in Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering. The one difference was race/ethnicity because race/ethnicity in the Survey of Graduate Students and Postdoctorates in Science and Engineering was only collected on U.S. citizens and permanent residents.

References

  • Anderson, M. S., & Swazey, J. P. (1998). Reflections on the graduate student experience: An overview. In M. S. Anderson (Ed.), The experience of being in graduate school: An exploration. New directions for teaching and learning, no. 101 (pp. 3–13). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 94–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 397–456). Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, B. J., & Austin, A. E. (2009). The role of doctoral advisors: A look at advising from the advisor’s perspective. Innovative Higher Education, 33(5), 297–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69, 479–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, B., & Taylor, B. J. (2015). Rise of the science and engineering postdoctorate and the restructuring of academic research. The Journal of Higher Education, 86(5), 667–696.

    Google Scholar 

  • Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13, 195–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, J. (2009). Representing doctoral practice in the laboratory sciences. In D. Boud & A. Lee (Eds.), Changing practices of doctoral education (pp. 113–125). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, N., Stewart, A. J., & Ostrove, J. M. (2013). Fostering academic self-concept: Advisor support and sense of belonging among international and domestic graduate students. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 108–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy, S. L., Brownell, S. E., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology classrooms. CBE: Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 478–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, P. P., Stevenson, H. C., & Gasman, M. (2014). Understanding race in doctoral student socialization. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 9, 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldon, D. F., Litson, K., Jeong, S., Blaney, J. M., Kang, J., Miller, C., et al. (2019). Postdocs’ lab engagement predicts trajectories of PhD students’ skill development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(42), 20910–20916.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldon, D. F., Maher, M. A., Roksa, J., & Peugh, J. (2016). Cumulative Advantage in the Skill Development of STEM Graduate Students: A Mixed-Methods Study. American Educational Research Journal, 53(1), 132–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flores-Scott, E. M., & Nerad, M. (2012). Peers in doctoral education: Unrecognized learning partners. New directions for higher education, 2012(157), 73–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K. (2007). “I heard it through the grapevine”: Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education, 54(5), 723–740.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K. (2010a). Faculty perspectives on doctoral student socialization in five disciplines. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5, 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K. (2010b). Keeping up with the Joneses: Socialization and culture in doctoral education at one striving institution. The Journal of Higher Education, 81(6), 658–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K., & Holley, K. A. (2011). “Those invisible barriers are real”: The progression of first-generation students through doctoral education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 44(1), 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, S. K., & Mendoza, P. (Eds.). (2012). On becoming a scholar: Socialization and development in doctoral education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C. M. (2000). Should I stay or should I go? Student descriptions of the doctoral attrition process. The review of higher education, 23(2), 199–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golde, C., Bueschel, A., Jones, L., & Walker, G. E. (2006). Apprenticeship and intellectual community: Lessons from the Carnegie Initiative on the Doctorate. Paper presented at the doctoral education and the faculty of the future conference, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

  • Gopaul, B. (2011). Distinction in doctoral education: Using Bourdieu’s tools to assess the socialization of doctoral students. Equity & Excellence in Education, 44, 10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S., & Bauer, T. (1995). Supervisory mentoring by advisers: Relationships with doctoral student potential, productivity, and commitment. Personnel Psychology, 48, 537–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, K. J. (2012). Intercept centering and time coding in latent difference score models. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(1), 137–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, J. A., & McCutcheon, A. L. (2002). Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holley, K. A. (2018). The longitudinal career experiences of interdisciplinary neuroscience PhD recipients. The Journal of Higher Education, 89, 106–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Bailey, J., Valentine, T., Cervero, R. M., & Bowles, T. A. (2009). Rooted in the soil: The social experiences of Black graduate students at a southern research university. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(2), 178–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuo, P. B., Woo, H., & Bang, N. M. (2017). Advisory relationship as a moderator between research self-Efficacy, motivation, and productivity among counselor education doctoral Students. Counselor Education and Supervision, 56(2), 130–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le, T., & Gardner, S. K. (2010). Understanding the doctoral experience of Asian international students in the science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields: An exploration of one institutional context. Journal of College Student Development, 51(3), 252–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlefield, C. M., Taddei, L. M., & Radosh, M. E. (2015). Organic collaborative teams: The role of collaboration and peer to peer support for part-time doctoral completion. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovitts, B. (2005). Being a good course-taker is not enough: A theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 137–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. (2002). Latent class models for clustering: A comparison with K-means. Canadian Journal of Marketing Research, 20(1), 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maher, M. A., Gilmore, J. A., Feldon, D. F., & Davis, T. E. (2013). Cognitive apprenticeship and the supervision of science and engineering research assistants. Journal of Research Practice, 9(2), Article M5. Retrieved from http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/354/311.

  • Maher, M., Wofford, A., Roksa, J., & Feldon, D. F. (2018). Exploring early exits: Doctoral attrition in the biomedical sciences. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory, & Practice. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025117736871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, J. J., & Epstein, D. (1987). Latent growth curves within developmental structural equation models. Child Development, 58, 110–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meschitti, V. (2018). Can peer learning support doctoral education? Evidence from an ethnography of a research team. Studies in Higher Education, 43, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, L. C., Brown, A. M., Moneta-Koehler, L., & Chalkley, R. (2018). Survey of checkpoints along the pathway to diverse biomedical research faculty. PLoS ONE, 13(1), e0190606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2002). Latent variable analysis with categorical outcomes: Multiple-group and growth modeling in Mplus. Mplus Web Notes, 4(5), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L.K., & Muthén, B.O. (1998–2017). Mplus User’s Guide. Eighth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

  • Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. K. (2000). Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: Growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcoholism, 24(6), 882–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. (2017). Survey of doctorate recipients 2013. Employed doctoral scientists and engineers, by field of doctorate, ethnicity, race, and sex: 2013. Retrieved from https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/doctoratework/2013/html/SDR2013_DST8.html

  • National Science Foundation (NSF). (2015). Doctorate recipients from U.S. universities. Washington, DC: Author.

  • National Science Foundation (NSF). (2017). Survey of graduate students and postdoctorates in science and engineering Fall 2017. Retrieved from https://ncsesdata.nsf.gov/gradpostdoc/2017

  • Nettles, M. T. (1990). Success in doctoral programs: Experiences of minority and white students. American Journal of Education, 98(4), 494–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nettles, M. T., & Millett, C. M. (2006). Three magic letters: Getting to Ph.D. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nora, A., & Cabrera, A. F. (1996). The role of perceptions of prejudice and discrimination on the adjustment of minority students to college. The Journal of Higher Education, 67(2), 119–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noy, S., & Ray, R. (2012). Graduate students’ perceptions of their advisors: Is there systematic disadvantage in mentorship? The Journal of Higher Education, 83(6), 876–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nylund, K. (2007). Latent transition analysis: Modeling extensions and an application to peer victimization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

  • Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(4), 535–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nylund-Gibson, K., Grimm, R., Quirk, M., & Furlong, M. (2014). A latent transition mixture model using the three-step specification. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(3), 439–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overall, N. C., Deane, K. L., & Peterson, E. R. (2011). Promoting doctoral students’ research self-efficacy: Combining academic guidance with autonomy support. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(6), 791–805.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paglis, L. L., Green, S. G., & Bauer, T. N. (2006). Does adviser mentoring add value? A longitudinal study of mentoring and doctoral student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 47(4), 451–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rojas, F. (2017). Theory for the working sociologist. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roksa, J., Jeong, S., Feldon, D., & Maher, M. (2018). Socialization experiences and research productivity of Asians and Pacific Islanders: “Model Minority” stereotype and domestic vs. international comparison. Research in the Sociology of Education, 20, 155–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. L. (2005). Group differences in graduate students’ concepts of the ideal mentor. Research in Higher Education, 46(1), 53–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sallee, M. W. (2011). Performing masculinity: Considering gender in doctoral student socialization. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 187–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satorra, A., & Bentler, P. M. (2001). A scaled difference Chi square test statistic for moment structure analysis. Psychometrika, 66, 507–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, G. (1978). Estimating the dimension of a model. The Annals of Statistics, 6, 461–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheltzer, M., & Smith, J. C. (2014). Elite male faculty in the life sciences employ fewer women. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(28), 10107–10112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowell, R., Bell, N., & Mahler, J. (2008). Ph.D. completion and attrition: Analysis of baseline demographic data from the Ph.D. Completion project. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools Ph.D. Completion Project. Retrieved from http://www.phdcompletion.org/information/book2.asp

  • Sterba, S. K., & Bauer, D. J. (2010). Matching method with theory in person-oriented developmental psychopathology research. Development and Psychopathology, 22(2), 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenenbaum, H. R., Crosby, F. J., & Gliner, M. D. (2001). Mentoring relationships in graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 326–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twale, D. J., Weidman, J. C., & Bethea, K. (2016). Conceptualizing socialization of graduate students of color: Revisiting the Weidman-Twale-Stein Framework. Western Journal of Black Studies, 40(2), 89–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. Applied latent class analysis, 11, 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Eye, A., & Bogat, G. A. (2006). Person-oriented and variable-oriented research: Concepts, results, and development. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 52(3), 390–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuong, Q. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica, 57, 307–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidman, J. C., & Stein, E. L. (2003). Socialization of doctoral students to academic norms. Research in Higher Education, 44(6), 641–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of graduate and professional students: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28, No. 3. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

  • Wulff, D. H., Austin, A. E., Nyquist, J. D., & Sprague, J. (2004). The development of graduate students as teaching scholars: a four-year longitudinal study. In D. Wulff & A. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, C. M., Golde, C. M., & McCormick, A. C. (2007). More than a signature: How advisor choice and advisor behaviour affect doctoral student satisfaction. Journal of further and higher education, 31(3), 263–281.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the National Science Foundation. This material is based upon work supported under Awards 1431234 and 1760894. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Soojeong Jeong.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jeong, S., Litson, K., Blaney, J. et al. Shifting Gears: Characteristics and Consequences of Latent Class Transitions in Doctoral Socialization. Res High Educ 61, 1027–1053 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09583-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-019-09583-7

Keywords

Navigation