Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 60, Issue 4, pp 553–575 | Cite as

Connecting School and Home: Examining Parental and School Involvement in Readiness for College Through Multilevel SEM

  • Chrystal A. George MwangiEmail author
  • Alberto F. Cabrera
  • Elizabeth R. Kurban
Article

Abstract

Parental involvement is widely acknowledged as a critical factor influencing the college choice process among families. What is not clear, though, is whether this parental driven factor also takes place at the school level along with school related factors. Using a national sample of 9th grade students drawn from about 900 schools, we found that parental involvement also operates at the school context along with a high school’s academic press. Moreover, at both individual- and school-level contexts, parental involvement creates a “college-going” cultural capital in the form of attainment of milestones towards college.

Keywords

College choice Parental involvement Socio-economic status School academic press Structural equation modeling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Our special thanks go to Ronald H. Heck, Professor of Educational Administration at the University of Hawai'i at Manoa. Ron graciously dedicated considerable time assisting us in unlocking the incredible potential multilevel structural equation modeling has in examining the impact of school and family contexts. We also thank the Research in Higher Education reviewers of this article whose feedback on earlier drafts improved our final manuscript.

References

  1. ACT. (2004). Crisis at the core: Preparing all students for college & work. Iowa City, IA: ACT.Google Scholar
  2. Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the tool box. Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  3. Alexander, K. L., & Entwisle, D. R. (1996). Schools and children at risk. In A. Booth & J. F. Dunn (Eds.), Family-school links: How do they affect educational outcomes? (pp. 67–88). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Arnold, K. D., Liu, E. C. & Armstrong, K. J. (2012). The ecology of college readiness. ASHE Higher Education Report, Vol. 38, No. 5. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  5. Auerbach, S. (2004). Engaging Latino parents in supporting college pathways: Lessons from a college access program. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(2), 125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergerson, A. (2009). College choice & access to college: Moving policies, research, & practice to the 21st century. ASHE Higher Education Report, Vol. 35, No. 4. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Berkner, L., Chavez, L., & Carroll, C. D. (1997). Access to postsecondary education for the 1992 high school graduates. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  8. Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Cabrera, A. F., Burkum, K. R., & LaNasa, S. (2005). Pathways to a four-year degree: Determinants of transfer and degree completion. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student retention: A formula for student success (pp. 155–209). Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger.Google Scholar
  10. Cabrera, A. F. & LaNasa, S. (2000). Understanding the college choice of disadvantaged students. New Directions for Institutional Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  11. Cabrera, A. F., Prabhu, R., Deil-Amen, R., Terenzini, P. T., Lee, C., & Franklin, R. F., Jr. (2006). Increasing the college preparedness of at-risk students. Journal of Latinos and Education, 5(2), 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calcagno, J. C., Crosta, P., Bailey, T., & Jenkins, D. (2007). Stepping stones to a degree: The impact of enrollment pathways and milestones on community college student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 775–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cooper, C., Chavira, G., & Mena, D. (2005). From pipelines to partnerships: A synthesis of research on how diverse families, schools and communities support children’s pathways through school. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10(4), 407–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corwin, Z. B., & Tierney, W. G. (2007). Getting there—and beyond: Building a culture of college going in high schools. Los Angeles: Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
  15. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eagle, E. (1989). Socioeconomic status, family structure, and parental involvement: The correlates of achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  18. Eccles, J. S., & Harold, R. D. (1993). Parent-school involvement during the early adolescent years. Teachers College Record, 94, 568.Google Scholar
  19. Enders, C. G. (2013). Analyzing structural equation modeling with missing data. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Muller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 439–493). North Carolina, Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Engberg, M. E., & Gilbert, A. (2014). The counseling opportunity structure: Examining correlates of four-year college going rates. Research in Higher Education, 55(3), 219–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Engberg, M. E., & Wolniak, G. C. (2010). Examining the effects of high school contexts on postsecondary enrollment. Research in Higher Education, 51(2), 132–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015. (2015–2016). P.L. 114-95 § 114, Stat. 1177.Google Scholar
  23. Fan, X., & Chen, M. (2001). Parental involvement and students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fan, W., & Williams, C. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 53–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Finney, S. J., & DiStefano, C. (2013). Nonnormal and categorical data in structural equation modeling. In G. R. Hanckock & R. O. Muller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Second course (2nd ed., pp. 439–493). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  26. Fordham, S. (1996). Blacked out: Dilemmas of race, identity, and success at Capital High. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. George Mwangi, C. A. (2015). (Re)Examining the role of family and community in college access and choice: A metasynthesis. The Review of Higher Education, 39(1), 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gibbons, M. M., & Borders, L. D. (2010). Prospective first-generation college students: A social-cognitive perspective. The Career Development Quarterly, 58(3), 194–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goddard, R. D., Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 683–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldring, E. B., & Phillips, K. J. (2008). Parent preferences and parent choices: The public–private decision about school choice. Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 209–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  32. Grodsky, E., & Riegle-Crumb, C. (2010). Those who choose and those who don’t: Social background and college orientation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 627(1), 14–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamilton, L. S., Stecher, B. M., & Yuan, K. (2008). Standards-based reform in the United States: History, research, and future directions. Washington, DC: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  34. Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. Du Toit, & D. Sörbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future- A Festschrift of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  35. Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2015). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches using Mplus. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heeringa, S. G., West, B. T., & Berglund, P. A. (2010). Applied survey data analysis. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hill, N., & Tyson, D. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytical assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hill, N. E., & Chao, R. K. (2009). Families, schools, and the adolescent: Connecting research, policy, and practice. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  39. Hill Collins, P. (2009). Another kind of public education: Race, school, the media, and democratic possibilities. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  40. Holcomb-McCoy, C. (2010). Involving low-income parents and parents of color in college readiness activities: An exploratory study. Professional School Counseling, 14(1), 115–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Holland, N. E. (2010). Postsecondary education preparation of traditionally underrepresented college students: A social capital perspective. Journal Of Diversity In Higher Education, 3(2), 111–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hossler, D., Braxton, J., & Coopersmith, G. (1989). Understanding student college choice. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 5, pp. 231–288). New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  43. Hossler, D., Schmidt, J., & Bouse, G. (1991). Family knowledge of postsecondary costs and financial aid. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 21(1), 4–17.Google Scholar
  44. Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & de Shoot, R. (2018). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ingels, S. J., Pratt, D. J., Herget, D. R., Burns, L. J., Dever, J. A., Ottem, R., Rogers, J. E., Jin, Y., & Leinwand, S. (2011). High school longitudinal study of 2009 (HSLS:09). Base-year data file documentation (NCES 2011-328). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  47. Jaeger, M. M. (2011). Does cultural capital really affect academic achievement? New evidence from combined sibling and panel data. Sociology of Education, 84(4), 281–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kaplan, L. S., & Owings, W. A. (2001). Teacher quality and student achievement: Recommendations for principals. NASSP Bulletin, 85, 628.Google Scholar
  49. Lee, C. (2006). Academic readiness and taking of college admission tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  50. Lee, V., & Burkam, D. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  51. Lee, V. E., Smith, J. B., & Croninger, R. G. (1997). How high school organization influences the equitable distribution of learning in mathematics and science. Sociology of Education, 70(2), 128–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leppel, K., Williams, M. L., & Waldauer, C. (2001). The impact of parental occupation and socioeconomic status on choice of college major. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 22(4), 373–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lieber, C. M. (2009). Increasing college access through school-based models of postsecondary preparation, planning, & support. Cambridge, MA: Educators for Social Responsibility.Google Scholar
  54. Ma, Y. (2009). Family socioeconomic status, parental involvement, and college major choices-gender, race/ethnic, and nativity patterns. Sociological Perspectives, 52(2), 211–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Marsh, H., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Morin, A., Abduljabbar, A., et al. (2012). Classroom climate and contextual effects: Conceptual and methodological issues in the evaluation of group-level effects. Educational Psychologist, 47, 106–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Martinez, M., & Klopott, S. (2002). How is school reform tied to increasing college access and success for low-income and minority youth?. Washington, DC: Pathways to College Network.Google Scholar
  57. Martinez, M., & Klopott, S. (2005). The link between high school reform & college access & success for low-income & minority youth. Washington, DC: AYPF.Google Scholar
  58. McCarron, G. P., & Inkelas, K. K. (2006). The gap between educational aspirations and attainment for first-generation college students and the role of parental involvement. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 534–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McClafferty, K. A., McDonough, P. M., & Nunez, A. (2002, April). What is a college culture? Facilitating college preparation through organizational change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
  60. McDonough, P. (2005). Counseling matters: Knowledge, assistance, organizational commitment in college preparation. In W. G. Tierney, Z. B. Corwin, & J. E. Colyar (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 69–87). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  61. McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  62. McDonough, P. M., & Calderone, S. (2006). The meaning of money: Perceptual differences between college counselors and low-income families about college costs and financial aid. American Behavioral Scientist, 12, 1703–1718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. McDonough, P. M., & Fann, A. (2007). The study of inequality. In P. Gumport (Ed.), Sociology of higher education: Contributions and their contexts (pp. 53–93). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  64. Moyer, M. (2011). Effects of non-guidance activities, supervision, and student-to-counselor ratios on school counselor burnout. Journal of School Counseling, 9(5), 1–31.Google Scholar
  65. Muthén, L. & Muthén, B. (1998–2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  66. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. (2002). P.L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6319.Google Scholar
  67. Odden, A., & Odden, E. (1995). Educational leadership for America’s schools. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  68. Oseguera, L. (2013). Importance of high school conditions for college access. Los Angeles, CA: UC Accord and Pathways to Postsecondary Success.Google Scholar
  69. Paisley, P. O., & McMahon, G. (2001). School counseling for the 21st century: Challenges and opportunities. Professional School Counseling, 5(2), 106–116.Google Scholar
  70. Pascarella, E. (2006). How college affects students: Ten directions for future research. Journal of College Student Development, 47(5), 508–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Patel, N., & Stevens, S. (2010). Parent-teacher-student discrepancies in academic ability beliefs: Influences on parent involvement. School Community Journal, 20(2), 115–136.Google Scholar
  72. Perna, L. W. (2005). The key to college access: Rigorous academic preparation. In W. G. Tierney, Z. B. Corwin, & J. E. Colyar (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 113–134). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  73. Perna, L. W. (2006). Studying college choice: A proposed conceptual model. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 99–157). New York: Agathon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Perna, L. W., & Titus, M. A. (2005). The relationship between parental involvement as social capital and college enrollment: An examination of racial/ethnic group differences. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(5), 485–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Perry, L. B., & McConney, A. (2010). Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1137–1162.Google Scholar
  76. Phillips, M. (1997). What makes schools effective? A comparison of the relationships of communitarian climate and academic climate to mathematics achievement and attendance during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 633–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Radford, A. W., Fritch, L. B., Leu, K., and Duprey, M. (2018). High school longitudinal study of 2009 (HSLS:09) second follow-up: A first look at fall 2009 ninth-graders in 2016 (NCES 2018-139). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: NCES.Google Scholar
  78. Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21, 173–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Raykov, T. (2009). Evaluation of scale reliability for unidimensional measures using latent variable modeling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42(3), 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Reyes, L. H., & Stanic, G. M. (1988). Race, sex, socioeconomic status, and mathematics. Journal for research in mathematics education, 19, 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rohde, T. E., & Thompson, L. A. (2007). Predicting academic achievement with cognitive ability. Intelligence, 35(1), 83–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Roney, K., Coleman, H., & Schlichting, K. A. (2007). Linking the organizational health of middle grades schools to student achievement. NASSP Bulletin, 91(4), 289–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Ross, T. (2016). The differential effects of parental involvement on high school completion and postsecondary attendance. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24, 30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Rowan-Kenyon, H. T., Bell, A. D., & Perna, L. W. (2008). Contextual influences on parental involvement in college going: Variations by socioeconomic class. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 564–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rumberger, R. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 583–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Savitz-Romer, M., & Bouffard, S. M. (2014). Ready, willing and able: A developmental approach to college access and success. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  87. Schneider, M., Marschall, M., Teske, P., & Roch, C. (1998). School choice and culture wars in the classroom: What different parents seek from education. Social Science Quarterly, 79(3), 489–501.Google Scholar
  88. Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis: A review. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sewell, W. H., & Hauser, R. M. (1992). A review of the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study of Social and Psychological Factors in Aspirations and Achievements 1963–1993. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  90. Sewell, W. H., Hauser, R. M., & Wolf, W. C. (1980). Sex, schooling, and occupational status. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 551–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sewell, W. H., & Shah, V. P. (1968). Social class, parental encouragement, and educational aspirations. American Journal of Sociology, 73(5), 559–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sharkness, J., & DeAngelo, L. (2011). Measuring student involvement: A comparison of classical test theory and item response theory in the construction of scales from student surveys. Research in Higher Education, 52, 480–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Shouse, R. C. (1996). Academic press and sense of community: Conflict, congruence, and implications for student achievement. Social Psychology in Education, 1, 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Smith, P. A. (2002). The organizational health of high schools and student proficiency in mathematics. International Journal of Educational Management, 16(2), 98–104.Google Scholar
  96. Spera, C. (2005). A review of the relationship among parenting practices, parenting styles, and adolescent school achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 17(2), 125–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Stage, F. K., & Hossler, D. (1989). Differences in family influences on college attendance plans for male and female ninth graders. Research in Higher Education, 30(3), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Stanton-Salazar, R. D., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1995). Social capital and the reproduction of inequality: Information networks among Mexican-origin high school students. Sociology of Education, 68, 116–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Stapleton, L. M. (2013). Multilevel structural equation modeling with complex sample data. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Muller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 521–562). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  100. Stapleton, L. M., Yang, J. S., & Hancock, G. R. (2016). Construct meaning in multilevel settings. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 41(5), 481–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Stewart, E. B. (2008). School structural characteristics, student effort, peer associations, and parental involvement the influence of school-and individual-level factors on academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 40(2), 179–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. The College Board. (2012). The College Board 2012 National Survey of School Counselors and Administrators report on survey findings: Barriers and supports to school counselor success. Washington, DC: The College Board.Google Scholar
  103. Thomas, S. L., & Heck, R. H. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling designs. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 517–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Tierney, W. G., & Auerbach, S. (2005). Toward developing an untapped resource: The role of families in college preparation. In W. G. Tierney, Z. B. Corwin, & J. E. Colyar (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 29–48). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  105. Viteritti, J. P. (2012). The federal role in school reform: Obama’s Race to the Top. Notre Dame Law Review, 87(5), 2087–2121.Google Scholar
  106. Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling. Applications using Mplus. West Sussex, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Wells, R., Kolek, E. A., Williams, E., & Saunders, D. B. (2015). “How we know what we know”: A systematic comparison of research methods employed in higher education journals, 1996–2000 v. 2006–2010. Journal of Higher Education, 86(2), 171–198.Google Scholar
  108. Wells, R. S., & Lynch, C. M. (2012). Delayed college entry and the socioeconomic gap: Examining the roles of student plans, family income, parental education, and parental occupation. Journal of Higher Education, 83(5), 671–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. White, K. R. (1982). The relation between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Wiley, A., Wyatt, J., & Camara, W. J. (2011). The development of a multidimensional college readiness index. College Board Research Report 2013-3. Retrieved from: https://research.collegeboard.org/sites/default/files/publications/2012/7/researchreport-2010-3-development-multidimensional-college-readiness-index.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chrystal A. George Mwangi
    • 1
    Email author
  • Alberto F. Cabrera
    • 2
  • Elizabeth R. Kurban
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Educational Policy, Research & AdministrationUniversity of Massachusetts AmherstAmherstUSA
  2. 2.Department of Counseling, Higher Education, and Special EducationCollege ParkUSA
  3. 3.Women in Engineering, A. James Clark School of EngineeringUniversity of Maryland, College ParkCollege ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations