Predicting Engineering Student Attrition Risk Using a Probabilistic Neural Network and Comparing Results with a Backpropagation Neural Network and Logistic Regression
As the need for engineers continues to increase, a growing focus has been placed on recruiting students into the field of engineering and retaining the students who select engineering as their field of study. As a result of this concentration on student retention, numerous studies have been conducted to identify, understand, and confirm relationships between student attributes and attrition. Methods of prediction have also been evaluated and compared. Utilizing the attributes found in previous studies to have correlation with student attrition, this study considers the results of three different prediction methods—logistic regression, a multi-layer perceptron artificial neural network, and a probabilistic neural network (PNN)—to predict engineering student retention at a case study university. The purpose of this study was to introduce the PNN to the study of engineering student retention prediction and compare the results of the PNN to other commonly used methods in this field of study. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and overall results for each method are reported, compared, and discussed as the major contribution of this paper.
KeywordsStudent retention Probabilistic neural network Logistic regression Attrition
- Alkhasawneh, R., & Hobson, R. (2011). Modeling student retention in science and engineering disciplines using neural networks. In 2011 IEEE global engineering education conference—learning environments and ecosystems in engineering education.Google Scholar
- Barker, K., Trafalis, T., & Rhoads, T. R. (2004). Learning from student data. In Proceedings of the 2004 systems and information engineering design symposium.Google Scholar
- Cripps, A. (1996). Using artificial neural nets to predict academic performance. In Proceedings of the 1996 ACM symposium on applied computing. ACM.Google Scholar
- Dahab, D. A., Ghoniemy, S. S. A., & Selim, G. M. (2012). Automated brain tumor detection and identification using image processing and probabilistic neural network techniques. International Journal of Image Processing and Visual Communication, 1(2), 1–8.Google Scholar
- Databytes. (2016). Retention range: The wide variation among 2007 freshmen. Connections Newsletter. Feb. 2016. American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE). http://createsend.com/t/y-45B6B3EF48CE7A3C.
- Herndon, S. (1984). Recent findings concerning the relative importance of housing to student retention. Journal of College and University Student Housing, 14(1), 27–31.Google Scholar
- Hochstein, S. K., & Butler, R. R. (1983). The effects of the composition of financial aids package on student retention. Journal of Student Financial Aid, 13(1), 21–26.Google Scholar
- Jaeger, A. J., & Hinz, D. (2009). The effects of part-time faculty on first semester freshmen retention: A predictive model using logistic regression. Journal of College Student Retention, 10(3), 265–286. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/196719548?accountid=15042.
- Jin, Q., Imbrie, P. K., Lin, J. J. J., & Chen, X. (2011) A multi-outcome hybrid model for predicting student success in engineering. In American Society for Engineering Education.Google Scholar
- Lin, J. J. J., Imbrie, P. K., & Reid, K. J. (2009). Student retention modelling: An evaluation of different methods and their impact on prediction results. In Research in engineering education symposium (pp. 1–6).Google Scholar
- Manpower Group. (2017). Focus on engineering 2017. Retrieved from http://www.experisjobs.us/Website-File-Pile/Whitepapers/Experis/engineering-whitepaper.pdf.
- National Student Clearinghouse©. (2016). Snapshot Report—Persistence and Retention. Research Center. Retrieved from https://nscresearchcenter.org/snapshotreport-persistenceretention22/.
- Office of Planning and Analysis (OPA). (2017). College Division 1st Year Freshmen Retention and Graduate Rates; Business Intelligence and Predictive Modeling (BIPM).Google Scholar
- President’s Committee of Advisors on Science and Technology, Panel on Educational Technology, Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Education for America’s Future, September 15, 2010.Google Scholar
- Rosati, P. (1993). Student retention from first-year engineering related to personality type. Frontiers in Education Conference (pp. 37–39). Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Schwab, K., & Samans, R. (2016). The future of jobs. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs.pdf.
- Smith, R., & Schumacher, P. (2006). Academic attributes of college freshmen that lead to success in actuarial studies in a business college. Journal of Education for Business, 81(5), 256–260. ISSN: 08832323.Google Scholar
- Superby, J.-F., Vandamme, J. P., & Meskens, N. (2006). Determination of factors influencing the achievement of the first-year university students using data mining methods. In Workshop on educational data mining.Google Scholar
- Wu, S. G., et al. (2007). A leaf recognition algorithm for plant classification using probabilistic neural network. In 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Signal processing and information technology. IEEE.Google Scholar