Research in Higher Education

, Volume 59, Issue 2, pp 198–225 | Cite as

Understanding College Students’ Major Choices Using Social Network Analysis

  • Rachel BakerEmail author


Concerns about the low completion rates in community colleges have led policy makers and administrators to examine interventions that aim to increase persistence and success by making colleges easier to navigate for students. One of the best supported and most well researched of the current reforms is guided pathways which aims to simplify student decision making. Meta majors, the grouping of all available majors into a handful of buckets, is an important components of these whole school reforms. In this paper I test an underlying assumption of this reform—that there are consistent groupings of majors that students would consider choosing—using tools from social network analysis. I draw on these consideration networks to examine how different groups of students cluster majors together; differences in how various groups of students group majors provides insight into how such interventions could increase efficiency or exacerbate inequality. These findings provide guidance for schools on what factors to consider when forming meta major groupings.


Community colleges Success and persistence in higher education Decision making Social network analysis 



I’d like to thank Sean Reardon, Eric Bettinger, Tom Dee, Michal Kurlaender, Davis Jenkins, Peter Crosta, and Eliza Evans for valuable feedback and advice at various stages of this Project. Funding for this Project came from Institute of Education Sciences Grant R305B090016, The Kimball Family Graduate Fellowship at Stanford University, and the Jack Kent Cooke Foundation.


  1. Arcidiacono, P., Hotz, V. J., & Kang, S. (2010). Modeling college major choices using elicited measures of expectations and counterfactuals. National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  2. Bahr, P. R. (2008). Does mathematics remediation work? A comparative analysis of academic attainment among community college students. Research in Higher Education, 49(5), 420–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bahr, P., Hom, W., & Perry, P. (2005). College transfer performance: A methodology for equitable measurement and comparison. Journal of Applied Research in the Community College, 13(1), 73–87.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, T., Jaggars, S., & Jenkins, D. (2015). Redesigning America’s community colleges. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bailey, T. R., Jenkins, D., Belfield, C. R., & Kopko, E. (2016). Matching talents to careers. In A. P. Kelly, J. S. Howell, & C. Sattin-Bajaj (Eds.), Matching students to opportunity: Expanding college choice, access and quality (pp. 79–98). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bailey, T., Jeong, D., & Cho, S.-W. (2010). Referral, enrollment, and completion in developmental education sequences in community colleges. Economics of Education Review, 29(2), 255–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baker, R., Bettinger, E., Jacob, B. & Marinescu, I. (2017). The effect of labor market inforomation on community college students’ major choice. (NBER Working Paper No. 23333). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  8. Booth, K., Cooper, D., Karandjeff, K., Purnell, R., Schiorring, E., & Willet, T. (2013). What students say they need to succeed: Key themes from a study of student support. California Community Colleges Research and Planning Group.Google Scholar
  9. Botti, S., & McGill, A. (2006). When choosing is not deciding: The effect of perceived responsibility on satisfaction. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bound, J., Lovenheim, M., & Turner, S. (2010). Why have college completion rates declined? An analysis of changing student preparation and collegiate resources. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(3), 129–157.Google Scholar
  11. Brisoux, J., & Laroche, M. (1980). A proposed consumer strategy of simplification for categorizing brands. In J. D. Summey & R. D. Taylor (Eds.) Evolving marketing thought for 1980. Proceedings of the annual meeting of the Southern Marketing Association (pp. 112–114). Carbondale, IL: Sothern Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  12. Bryant, A. (2001). Community college students: Recent findings and trends. Community College Review, 29(3), 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cabrera, A. F., Burkum, K. R., & La Nasa, S. M. (2005). Pathways to a four-year degree: Determinants of transfer and degree completion. In A. Seidman (Ed.), College student retention: A formula for success (pp. 155–214). Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger Series on Higher Education.Google Scholar
  14. Calcagno, J., Bailey, T., Jenkins, D., Kienzl, G., & Leinbach, T. (2008). Community college student success: What institutional factors make a difference? Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 632–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office (2010). Associate degree for transfer.
  16. California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office. (2017). Data Mart [data file].
  17. Cohen, A., & Brawer, F. (2013). The American community college (6th ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. Crosta, P. (2014). Intensity and attachment: How the chaotic enrollment patterns of community college students affect educational outcomes. Community College Review, 42(2), 118–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dawes, P. L., & Brown, J. (2002). Determinants of awareness, consideration, and choice set size in university choice. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 12(1), 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dawes, P. L., & Brown, J. (2004). The composition of consideration and choice sets in undergraduate university choice: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 14(2), 49–75.Google Scholar
  21. DesJardins, S. L., Ahlburg, D. A., & McCall, B. P. (2006). An integrated model of application, admission, enrollment, and financial aid. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 381–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Diehl, K., Kornish, L., & Lynch, J. (2003). Smart agents: When lower search costs for quality information increase price sensitivity. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(1), 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dougherty, K. (1994). The contradictory college: The conflicting origins, impacts, and futures of the community college. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  24. Elliott, E., & Dweck, C. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Galotti, K. M. (1999). Making a “major” real-life decision: College students choosing an academic major. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gardenhire-Crooks, A., Collado, H., & Ray, B. (2006). A Whole’ Nother World: Students navigating community college. New York: MDRC.Google Scholar
  27. Goldrick-Rab, S. (2010). Challenges and opportunities for improving community college student success. Review of Educational Research, 80(3), 437–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Goldrick-Rab, S., & Han, S. W. (2011). Accounting for socioeconomic differences in delaying the transition to college. The Review of Higher Education, 34(3), 423–445.Google Scholar
  29. Gradín, C., Del Río, C., & Alonso-Villar, O. (2015). Occupational segregation by race and ethnicity in the United States: Differences across states. Regional Studies, 49(10), 1621–1638.Google Scholar
  30. Grant, H., & Dweck, C. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grubb, W. N. (2006). Like, what do I do now? The dilemmas of guidance counseling. In T. Bailey & V. S. Morest (Eds.), Defending the community college equity agenda (pp. 195–222). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Grund, T. (2015). Network analysis using Stata.
  33. Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California, Riverside Press.Google Scholar
  34. Hauser, J., & Wernerfelt, B. (1990). An evaluation cost model of consideration sets. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(4), 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hegewisch, A., & Hartmann, H. (2014). Occupational segregation and the gender wage gap: A job half done. Institute for Women’s Policy Research Report.Google Scholar
  36. Horn, L., & Nevill, S. (2006). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 200304, With a special analysis of community college students. NCES Report # 2006184.Google Scholar
  37. Iyengar, S. S., & Lepper, M. R. (2000). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality Processes and Individual Differences, 79(6), 995–1006.Google Scholar
  38. Jackson, M. (2008). Social and economic networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Jacoby, J. (1984). Perspectives on information overload. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(4), 432–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jenkins, D. (2014). Redesigning community colleges for student success: Overview of the guided pathways approach. Community College Research Center Working Paper.Google Scholar
  41. Jenkins, D., Lahr, H., & Fink, J. (2017). Implementing guided pathways: Early insights from the AACC pathways colleges. Community College Research Center Report.Google Scholar
  42. Johnson, E., Shu, S., Dellaert, B., Fox, C., Goldstein, D., Haubl, G., et al. (2012). Beyond nudges: Tools of choice architecture. Marketing Letters, 23, 487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Keller, P. A., Harlam, B., Lowenstein, G., & Volpp, K. (2011). Enhanced active choice: A new method to motivate behavior change. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 21, 376–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Laroche, M., Rosenblatt, J., & Sinclair, I. (1984). Brand categorization strategies in an extensive problem solving situation: A study of university Choice. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 175–179.Google Scholar
  46. Latham, G. (2004). The motivational benefits of goal-setting. Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(4), 126–129.Google Scholar
  47. Locke, E., & Latham, G. (2006). New directions in goal-setting theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lynch, J., & Ariely, D. (2000). Wine online: Search costs affect competition on price, quality, and distribution. Marketing Science, 19(1), 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mann, A., & DiPrete, T. (2013). Trends in gender segregation in the choice of science and engineering majors. Social Science Research, 42, 1519–1541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mechur Karp, M. (2013). Entering a program: Helping students make academic and career decisions. Community College Research Center Working Paper #59. Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
  51. Miller, G. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). Digest of education statistics, integrated postsecondary education data system, spring 2002–spring 2013 graduation rates component, Table 326.20.Google Scholar
  53. Oreopoulos, P., & Petronijevic, U. (2013). Making college worth it: A review of the returns to higher education. The Future of Children, 23(1), 41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (1980). Predicting freshman persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model. Journal of Higher Education, 51, 60–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Payne, J. W. (1976). Task complexity and contingent processing in decision making: An information search and protocol analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 366–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Person, A. E., & Rosenbaum, J. E. (2006). “Chain enrollment” and college “enclaves”: Benefits and drawbacks of Latino college students’ enrollment decisions. In C. L. Horn, S. Flores, & G. Orfield (Eds.), New directions for community colleges: Community colleges and Latino educational opportunity (pp. 51–60). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  57. Pintrich, P., & de Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Reardon, S. F., Baker, R., & Klasik, D. (2012). Race, income, and enrollment patterns in highly selective colleges, 1982-2004. Center for Education Policy Analysis, Stanford University. Retrieved from
  59. Roberts, J. H., & Lattin, J. M. (1991). Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. Journal of Marketing Research. doi: 10.2307/3172783.Google Scholar
  60. Roberts, J. H., & Lattin, J. M. (1997). Consideration: Review of research and prospects for future insights. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 406–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roderick, M., Nagaoka, J., & Coca, V. (2009). College readiness for all: The challenge for urban high schools. Future of Children, 19, 185–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rosenbaum, J., Deil-Amen, R., & Person, A. (2006). After admission: From college access to college success. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  63. Schuetz, P., Rosenbaum, J., Foran, A., & Cepa, K. (2016). Degree ladder maps: Helping students make earlier, more informed decisions about educational goals. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 40(3), 228–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scott-Clayton, J. E. (2015). The shapeless river: Does a lack of structure inhibit students’ progress at community colleges? In B. Castleman, S. Schwartz, & S. Baum (Eds.), Decision making for student success: Behavioral insights to improve college access and persistence (pp. 102–123). New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  65. Shapiro, D., Dundar, A., Wakhungu, P. K., Yuan, X., Nathan, A., & Hwang, Y. (2016, November). Completing college: A national view of student attainment ratesFall 2010 cohort. Signature Report No. 12. Herndon, VA: National Student Clearinghouse Research Center.Google Scholar
  66. Simon, H. A. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Spady, W. (1971). Dropouts from higher education: Toward an empirical model. Interchange, 2, 38–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Streeter, C., & Gillespie, D. (1993). Social network analysis. Journal of Social Service Research, 16(1), 201–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sundstrom, G. (1987). Information search and decision making: The effects of information displays. Acta Psychologica, 65, 165–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Taing, M., Smith, T., Singla, N., Johnson, R., & Chang, C. (2013). The relationship between learning goal orientation, goal setting, and performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43(8), 1668–1675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Taylor, P., Fry, R., Wang, W., Dockterman, D., & Velasco, G. (2009). College enrollment hits all-time high, fueled by community college surge. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
  72. Thaler, R. (1980). Toward a positive theory of consumer choice. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1(1), 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thaler, R., & Sunstein, C. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Thomas, A., & Blitzstein, J. K. (2011). Valued ties tell fewer lies: Why not to dichotomize network edges with thresholds. Working Paper, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  75. Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (1st ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  76. Tinto, V. (2006). Research and practice of student retention: What next? Journal of College Student Retention, 8(1), 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tomaskovic-Devey, D., Zimmer, C., Stainback, K., Robinson, C., Taylor, T., & McTague, T. (2006). Documenting desegregation: Segregation in American workplaces by race, ethnicity, and sex, 1966–2003. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 565–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wright, P., & Barbour, F. (1977). Phased decision strategies: Sequels to initial screening. In M. Starr & M. Zeleny (Eds.), Multiple criteria decision making: North Holland TIMS studies in the management science (pp. 91–109). Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  80. Zeidenberg, M. (2012). Valuable learning or “spinning their wheels?” Understanding excess credits earned by community college associate degree completers. Community College Research Center Working Paper #44. Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of California, Irvine2060 EducationIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations