Research in Higher Education

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 395–429 | Cite as

Dramatic Declines in Higher Education Appropriations: State Conditions for Budget Punctuations

  • Amy Y. LiEmail author


Public colleges and universities depend heavily on state appropriations and legislatures must decide how much to fund higher education. This study applies punctuated equilibrium theory to characterize the distribution of annual changes in higher education appropriations and defines the threshold for a dramatic budget cut. Using data for the 50 states from years 1980 to 2009, this study investigates the relationship between such unique policy events and state characteristics using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results show that economic and political conditions are most predicative of dramatic budget cuts. High unemployment rates increase the probability of cuts while rapid increases in tax revenue and wider income inequality are protective against cuts. Unified Republican and unified Democratic governments are both more likely to cut spending compared to a divided government. Sensitivity analyses of state characteristics associated with small budget cuts demonstrates that large cuts are indeed unique events catalyzed by different conditions.


Higher education finance State appropriations Public budgeting Punctuated equilibrium theory Event history analysis 


  1. Allison, P. D. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS system: A practical guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.Google Scholar
  2. Allison, P. D. (2010). Survival analysis. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 413–425). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Alt, J. E., & Lowry, R. C. (2000). A dynamic model of state budget outcomes under divided partisan government. The Journal of Politics, 62(4), 1035–1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andersen, P. K., & Gill, R. D. (1982). Cox’s regression model for counting processes: A large sample study. The Annals of Statistics, 10(4), 1100–1120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, S., & Halbridge, L. (2010). Incrementalism in appropriations: Small aggregation, big changes. Public Administration Review, 20(3), 464–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Archibald, R. B., & Feldman, D. H. (2006). State higher education spending and the tax revolt. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(4), 618–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arestis, P., Cipollini, A., & Fattouh, B. (2004). Threshold effects in the U.S. budget deficit. Economic Inquiry, 42(2), 214–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrilleaux, C., & Berkman, M. (2003). Do governors matter? Budgeting rules and the politics of state policymaking. Political Research Quarterly, 56(4), 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baum, S., Breneman, D. W., Chingos, M. M., Ehrenberg, R. G., Jones, A. G., Longanecker, D. A., et al. (2012). Beyond need and merit: Strengthening state grant programs: Technical Report May. Brown Center on Education Policy at Brookings.Google Scholar
  10. Baumgartner, F. R., Breunig, C., Green-Pedersen, C., Jones, B. D., Mortensen, P. B., Nuytemans, M., et al. (2009). Punctuated equilibrium in comparative perspective. American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 603–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baybeck, B., Berry, W. D., & Siegel, D. A. (2011). A strategic theory of policy diffusion via intergovernmental competition. The Journal of Politics, 73(01), 232–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (2007). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process, chap. 8 (2nd ed., pp. 223–260). Davis, CA: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  13. Berry, W. D., Fording, R. C., Ringquist, E. J., Hanson, R. L., & Klarner, C. E. (2010). Measuring citizen and government in the U.S. states: A re-appraisal. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 10(2), 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C., & Hanson, R. L. (1998). Measuring citizen and government ideology in the American states, 1960–1993. American Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 327–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berry, W. D., Ringquist, E. J., Fording, R. C., & Hanson, R. L. (2007). A rejoinder: The measurement and stability of state citizen ideology. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7(2), 160–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & De Boef, S. (2006). Repeated events survival models: the conditional frailty model. Statistics in Medicine, 25(20), 3518–3533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Box-Steffensmeier, J. M., & Jones, B. S. (2004). Event history modeling: A guide for social scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Breunig, C., & Koski, C. (2006). Punctuated equilibria and budgets in the American States. Policy Studies Journal, 34(3), 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Breunig, C., & Koski, C. (2012). The tortoise or the hare? Incrementalism, punctuations, and their consequences. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 45–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Breunig, C., Koski, C., & Mortensen, P. B. (2010). Stability and punctuations in public spending: A comparative study of budget functions. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20(3), 703–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Brinkman, P. T., & Morgan, A. W. (1995). The future of higher education finance. New Directions for Institutional Research, 1995(85), 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carter, J. C. (2011). Quality cutting: Perceived faculty and staff effects of state budget cuts on institutional quality. Public Organization Review, 12(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cheslock, J. J., & Gianneschi, M. (2008). Replacing state appropriations with alternative revenue sources: The case of voluntary support. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(2), 208–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cheslock, J. J., & Hughes, R. P. (2011). Differences across states in higher education finance policy. Journal of Education Finance, 36(4), 369–393.Google Scholar
  25. Cohen-Vogel, L., Ingle, W. K., Levine, A. A., & Spence, M. (2007). The “spread” of merit-based college aid: Politics, policy consortia, and interstate competition. Educational Policy, 22(3), 339–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crookston, A., & Hooks, G. (2012). Community colleges, budget cuts, and jobs: The impact of community colleges on employment growth in rural U.S. counties, 1976–2004. Sociology of Education, 85(4), 350–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Curs, B. R., Bhandari, B., & Steiger, C. (2011). The roles of public higher education expenditure and the privatization of the higher education on U.S. states economic growth. Journal of Education. Finance, 36(4), 424–442.Google Scholar
  28. Darmofal, D. (2009). Bayesian spatial survival models for political event processes. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Delaney, J. A. (2011). Earmarks and state appropriations for higher education. Journal of Education Finance, 37(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  30. Delaney, J. A., & Doyle, W. R. (2011). State spending on higher education: Testing the balance wheel over time. Journal of Education Finance, 36(4), 343–368.Google Scholar
  31. DePillis, E. G., & DePillis, L. G. (2001). The long-term impact of university budget cuts: A mathematical model. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 33, 851–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Doyle, W. R. (2006). Adoption of merit-based student grant programs: An event history analysis. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(3), 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Doyle, W. R. (2010). Does merit-based aid “crowd out” need-based aid? Research in Higher Education, 51(5), 397–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Doyle, W. R. (2013, November/December). State funding for higher education: Situation normal? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning.Google Scholar
  35. Doyle, W. R., & Zumeta, W. (2014). State-level responses to the access and completion challenge in the new era of austerity. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655(1), 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Education Commission of the States (2016). 50-state comparison: Postsecondary governance structures.Google Scholar
  37. Fox, J. (2002). Cox proportional-hazards regression for survival data: The Cox proportional-hazards model. Technical report, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  38. Hearn, J. C., McLendon, M. K., & Lacy, A. T. (2013). State-funded “eminent scholars” programs: University faculty recruitment as an emerging policy instrument. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(5), 601–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heck, R. H., Lam, W. S., & Thomas, S. L. (2014). State political culture, higher education spending indicators, and undergraduate graduation outcomes. Educational Policy, 28(1), 3–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Heller, D. E. (2004). The changing nature of financial aid. Academe, 90(4), 36–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hovey, H. A. (1999). State spending for higher education in the next decade: The battle to sustain current support. Technical Report July, National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education, San Jose, CA.Google Scholar
  42. Huber, J. D., Shipan, C. R., & Pfahler, M. (2001). Legislatures and statutory control of bureaucracy. American Journal of Political Science, 45(2), 330–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jaquette, O., & Curs, B. R. (2015). Creating the out-of-state university: Do public universities increase nonresident freshman enrollment in response to declining state appropriations? Research in Higher Education, 56(6), 535–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). A model of choice for public policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(3), 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2012). From there to here: Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing. Policy Studies Journal, 40(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jones, B. D., Baumgartner, F. R., Breunig, C., Wlezien, C., Soroka, S., Foucault, M., et al. (2009). A general empirical law of public budgets: A comparative analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 855–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kane, T. J., Orszag, P. R., & Gunter, D. L. (2003). State fiscal contraints and higher education spending: The role of medicaid and the business cycle. Technical report, The Urban Institute, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  48. Lacy, T. A., & Tandberg, D. A. (2014). Rethinking policy diffusion: The interstate spread of “finance innovations”. Research in Higher Education, 55, 627–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Layzell, B. D. T. (2007). State higher education funding models: An assesment of current and emerging approaches. Journal of Education Finance, 33(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  50. Leloup, L. T., & Moreland, W. B. (1978). Agency strategies and executive review: The hidden politics of budgeting. Public Administration Review, 38(3), 232–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Levy, D. C., & Zumeta, W. (2011). Private higher education and public policy: A global view. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 13(4), 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Li, A. Y., & Zumeta, W. (2015). State support for higher education. In J. Huisman, H. de Boer, D. Dill, & M. Souto-Otero (Eds.), The Palgrave international handbook of higher education policy and governance, chapter 25 (pp. 463–482). London, UK: Palgrave/Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Longanecker, D. A. (2006). A tale of two pities: The story of public higher education finance in America. Change, 38(1), 14–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mason, C. (2005). Cox proportional hazard models. Technical report, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
  55. McGuinness, A. C. (2003). Models of postsecondary education coordination and governance in the states. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
  56. McGuinness, A. C., & Novak, R. (2011). The statewide public agenda and higher education: Making it work. Trusteeship, 19(2), 25–29.Google Scholar
  57. McLendon, M. K. (2003). Setting the governmental agenda for state decentralization of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 74(5), 479–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. McLendon, M. K., Deaton, R., & Hearn, J. C. (2007). The enactment of reforms in state governance of higher education: Testing the political instability hypothesis. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(6), 645–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Deaton, R. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Mokher, C. G. (2009). Partisans, professionals, and power: The role of political factors in state higher education funding. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(6), 686–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McLendon, M. K., Heller, D. E., & Young, S. (2005). State postsecondary policy innovation: Politics, competition, and the interstate migration of policy ideas. The Journal of Higher Education, 76(4), 363–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. McLendon, M. K., Tandberg, D. A., & Hillman, N. W. (2014). Financing college opportunity: Factors influencing state spending on student financial aid and campus appropriations, 1990 through 2010. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655(1), 143–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Morgan, D. R., Kickham, K., & LaPlant, J. T. (2001). State support for higher education: A political economy approach. Policy Studies Journal, 29(3), 359–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. NASSGAP. (2012). 43rd Annual survey report on state-sponsored student financial aid. Technical report, National Association of State Student Grant and Aid Programs.Google Scholar
  65. New, M. J. (2010). U.S. state tax and expenditure limitations: A comparative political analysis. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 10(1), 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Newfield, C. (2010). Avoiding the coming higher ed wars. Academe, 96(3), 38–42.Google Scholar
  67. Okunade, A. A. (2004). What factors influence state appropriations for public higher education in the United States? Journal of Education Finance, 30(2), 123–138.Google Scholar
  68. Powell, B. A., Gilleland, D. S., & Pearson, L. C. (2012). Expenditures, efficiency, and effectiveness in U.S. undergraduate higher education: A national benchmark model. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(1), 102–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Priest, D., & St. John, E. P. (2006). Privatization and public universities. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Robinson, S. E., Caver, F., Meier, K. J., & O’Toole, L. J. (2007). Explaining policy punctuations: Bureaucratization and budget change. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1), 140–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Shipan, C. R., & Volden, C. (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 52(4), 840–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Squire, P. (2007). Measuring state legislative professionalism: The Squire index revisted. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 7(2), 211–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. State Higher Education Executive Officers. (2013). State Higher Education Finance FY 2013. Technical report, State Higher Education Executive Officers, Boulder CO.Google Scholar
  74. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  75. Tandberg, D. A. (2009). Interest groups and governmental institutions: The politics of state funding of public higher education. Educational Policy, 24(5), 735–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Tandberg, D. A. (2010). Politics, interest groups and state funding of public higher education. Research in Higher Education, 51(5), 416–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tandberg, D. A. (2013). The conditioning role of state higher education governance structures. The Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 506–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Tandberg, D. A., & Griffith, C. (2013). State support of higher education: Data, measures, findings, and directions for future research. In M. B. Paulsen (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, chap. 13 (Vol. 28, pp. 613–685). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Thomas, L., & Reyes, E. M. (2014). Tutorial: Survival estimation for Cox regression models with time-varying coefficients using SAS and R. Journal of Statistical Software, 61, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Titus, M. A. (2009). Financial aspects of bachelor’s degrees and of state higher education policy: A dynamic analysis. The Journal of Higher Education, 80(4), 439–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Toutkoushian, R. K., & Hollis, P. (1998). Using panel data to examine legislative demand for higher education. Education Economics, 6(2), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. True, J. L., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2007). Punctuated-equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in public policymaking. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 155–188). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  83. Weerts, D. J., & Ronca, J. M. (2012). Understanding differences in state support for higher education across states, sectors, and institutions: A longitudinal study. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(2), 155–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Willett, J. B., & Singer, J. D. (1995). It’s deja vu all over again: Using multiple-spell discrete-time survival analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 20(1), 41–67.Google Scholar
  85. Zhang, L., & Ness, E. C. (2010). Does state merit-based aid stem brain drain? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(2), 143–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zumeta, W. (1998). Public university accountability to the state in the late twentieth century: Time for a rethinking? Policy Studies Review, 15(4), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zumeta, W. (2012). States and higher education: On their own in a stagnant economy. Technical report, National Economic Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Leadership, Policy, & DevelopmentUniversity of Northern ColoradoGreeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations