Research in Higher Education

, Volume 57, Issue 4, pp 448–468 | Cite as

Which Peers Matter: How Social Ties Affect Peer-group Effects

Article

Abstract

We study how the achievements of university students are influenced by the characteristics and achievements of peers in individuals’ social networks. Defining peer group in terms of friendship and study partner ties enables us to apply a network regression model and thereby disentangle the influence of peers’ performance from that of peers’ background. We find significant positive peer effects via the academic achievements of friends and study partners. Students’ grades increase with the abilities of study partners, who may or may not also be friends; no such effect is observed for friends who are not also study partners. Additionally, the effects of the abilities of other classmates are found to be insignificant. The results support the claim that peer influence acts mainly through knowledge-sharing channels between students who are connected by social ties.

Keywords

Peer effects Higher education Student achievement Social networks 

Supplementary material

11162_2015_9391_MOESM1_ESM.docx (76 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 69 kb)

References

  1. Androushchak, G., Poldin, O., & Yudkevich, M. (2013). Role of peers in student academic achievement in exogenously formed university groups. Educational Studies, 39(5), 568–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antrobus, J. S., Dobbelaer, R., & Salzinger, S. (1988). Social networks and college success, or grade point average and the friendly connection. Social networks of children, adolescents, and college students (pp. 227–246). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Bowman, N. A., & Park, J. J. (2014). Interracial contact on college campuses: Comparing and contrasting predictors of cross-racial interaction and interracial friendship. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(5), 660–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowman, N. A., & Park, J. J. (2015). Not all diversity interactions are created equal: Cross-racial interaction, close interracial friendship, and college student outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 56(6), 601–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., & Fortin, B. (2009). Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of Econometrics, 150(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brunello, G., De Paola, M., & Scoppa, V. (2010). Peer effects in higher education: Does the field of study matter? Economic Inquiry, 48(3), 621–634.Google Scholar
  7. Burton, N. W., & Ramist, L. (2001). Predicting success in college: SAT studies of classes graduating since 1980. College Entrance Examination Board Research Report 2001–2002.Google Scholar
  8. Carrell, S. E., Fullerton, R. L., & West, J. E. (2009). Does your cohort matter? Measuring peer effects in college achievement. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(3), 439–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carrell, S. E., Sacerdote, B. I., & West, J. E. (2013). From natural variation to optimal policy? The importance of endogenous peer group formation. Econometrica, 81(3), 855–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cohen, J. (1983). Peer influence on college aspirations with initial aspirations controlled. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 728–734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Conti, G., Galeotti, A., Mueller, G., & Pudney, S. (2013). Popularity. Journal of Human Resources, 48, 1072–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Currarini, S., Jackson, M. O., & Pin, P. (2009). An economic model of friendship: Homophily, minorities, and segregation. Econometrica, 77(4), 1003–1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Fraja, G., Oliveira, T., & Zanchi, L. (2010). Must try harder: Evaluating the role of effort in educational attainment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 92(3), 577–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Giorgi, G., Pellizzari, M., & Redaelli, S. (2010). Identification of social interactions through partially overlapping peer groups. American Economic Journal-Applied Economics, 2(2), 241–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Paola, M., & Scoppa, V. (2010). Peer group effects on the academic performance of Italian students. Applied Economics, 42(17), 2203–2215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Epple, D., & Romano, R. E. (2011). Peer effects in education: A survey of the theory and evidence. In J. Benhabib, A. Bisin, & M. O. Jackson (Eds.), Handbook of social economics (Vol. 1, pp. 1053–1163). Utrecht: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  17. Foster, G. (2006). It’s not your peers, and it’s not your friends: Some progress toward understanding the educational peer effect mechanism. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9), 1455–1475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g?: The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15(6), 373–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gašević, D., Zouaq, A., & Janzen, R. (2013). “Choose your classmates, your GPA is at stake!”: The association of cross-class social ties and academic performance. American Behavioral Scientist, 57(10), 1460–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goldsmith-Pinkham, P., & Imbens, G. W. (2013). Social networks and the identification of peer effects. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 31(3), 253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Griffith, A. L., & Rask, K. N. (2014). Peer effects in higher education: A look at heterogeneous impacts. Economics of Education Review, 39, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hasan, S., & Bagde, S. (2013). The mechanics of social capital and academic performance in an indian college. American Sociological Review, 78(6), 1009–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hommes, J., Rienties, B., de Grave, W., Bos, G., Schuwirth, L., & Scherpbier, A. (2012). Visualising the invisible: A network approach to reveal the informal social side of student learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 17(5), 743–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hsieh, C.-S., & Lee, L. F. (2015). A social interactions model with endogenous friendship formation and selectivity. Journal of Applied Econometrics. doi:10.1002/jae.2426.
  25. Hurtado, S., Alvarez, C., Guillermo-Wann, C., Cuellar, M., & Arellano, L. (2012). A Model for Diverse Learning Environments. In J. C. Smart & M. B. Paulsen (Eds.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (pp. 41–122). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jain, T., & Kapoor, M. (2014). The impact of study groups and roommates on academic performance. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(1), 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kao, G., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in educational achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 417–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J. H., & Whitt, E. J. (2011). Student success in college: Creating conditions that matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. LeSage, J. P., & Pace, R. K. (2011). Pitfalls in higher order model extensions of basic spatial regression methodology. Review of Regional Studies, 41(1), 13–26.Google Scholar
  30. Lin, X. (2010). Identifying peer effects in student academic achievement by spatial autoregressive models with group unobservables. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(4), 825–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lin, X. (2015). Utilizing spatial autoregressive models to identify peer effects among adolescents. Empirical Economics, 2015, 1–32.Google Scholar
  32. Liu, X., Patacchini, E., & Rainone, E. (2013). The allocation of time in sleep: A social network model with sampled data. American Economic Journal Applied Economics: Working Paper No. 162, Center for Policy Research, Syracuse University.Google Scholar
  33. Lomi, A., Snijders, T. A. B., Steglich, C. E. G., & Torló, V. J. (2011). Why are some more peer than others? Evidence from a longitudinal study of social networks and individual academic performance. Social Science Research, 40, 1506–1520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lyle, D. S. (2007). Estimating and interpreting peer and role model effects from randomly assigned social groups at west point. Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(2), 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lyle, D. S. (2009). The effects of peer group heterogeneity on the production of human capital at west point. American Economic Journal-Applied Economics, 1(4), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayer, A., & Puller, S. L. (2008). The old boy (and girl) network: Social network formation on university campuses. Journal of Public Economics, 92(1–2), 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McEwan, P. J., & Soderberg, K. A. (2006). Roommate effects on grades: Evidence from first-year housing assignments. Research in Higher Education, 47(3), 347–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Millo, G. (2014). Maximum likelihood estimation of spatially and serially correlated panels with random effects. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 71, 914–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Noble, J. P., & Sawyer, R. L. (2002). Predicting different levels of academic success in college using high school GPA and ACT composite score. ACT Research Report Series.Google Scholar
  42. Patacchini, E., Rainone, E., & Zenou, Y. (2014). Heterogeneous peer effects in education. Discussion paper No. 9804, Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
  43. Renn, K. A. (2012). Mixed race students in college: The ecology of race, identity, and community on campus. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sacerdote, B. (2001). Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(2), 681–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sacerdote, B. (2011). Peer effects in education: How might they work, how big are they and how much do we know thus far? In E. A. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 3, pp. 249–277). New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  46. Shaw, E. J., Kobrin, J. L., Patterson, B. F., & Mattern, K. D. (2012). The validity of the SAT for predicting cumulative grade point average by college major. Research Report 2012–6. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.Google Scholar
  47. Smith, R. A., & Peterson, B. L. (2007). “Psst …what do you think?” the relationship between advice prestige, type of advice, and academic performance. Communication Education, 56(3), 278–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stinebrickner, R., & Stinebrickner, T. R. (2006). What can be learned about peer effects using college roommates? Evidence from new survey data and students from disadvantaged backgrounds. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8–9), 1435–1454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stinebrickner, R., & Stinebrickner, T. R. (2008). The causal effect of studying on academic performance. B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8(1), 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Thomas, S. L. (2000). Ties that bind - a social network approach to understanding student integration and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 71(5), 591–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994). Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zimmerman, D. J. (2003). Peer effects in academic outcomes: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Institutional StudiesNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations