The purpose of the study is to map global research in international higher education. Specifically, the study uses bibliometric and social network analysis methods to identify key individuals, institutions, countries, and disciplines contributing to research in international higher education and to investigate patterns of connectivity among authors, journals, disciplines, and topics. The dataset representing research covers 2302 publications from the Web of Science for the period 2002–2011. Unlike prior attempts to draw a representative sample of articles capturing key research in international higher education by choosing articles from key journals, this study sampled articles more broadly by applying a keywords search to all journals included in the bibliographic database. To address the ambiguity in defining the boundaries of the field, the keywords used in constructing the dataset were generated from an explicit definition of “research in international higher education” with the definition being U.S.-centric, i.e. defining the field from the perspective of a U.S.-based researcher. Results indicated that although the number of research studies on international higher education has grown from 68 in 2002 to 472 in 2012, networks among researchers of higher education continue to operate largely within national borders and are still dominated by a few Western countries. While the 3362 researchers in international higher education came from 1164 different institutions/organizations around the world, only 11.3 % of articles were authored by researchers from at least two countries.
International higher education International research collaboration Bibliometric Social network analysis
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Altbach, P. G. (2009). Higher education: An emerging field of research and policy. In R. M. Bassett & A. Maldonado (Eds.), International organizations and higher education policy: Thinking globally, acting locally? (pp. 9–25). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Budd, J. M. (1990). Higher education literature: Characteristics of citation patterns. The Journal of Higher Education,61(1), 84–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budd, J. M., & Magnuson, L. (2010). Higher education literature revisited: Citation patterns examined. Research in Higher Education,51(3), 294–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, B. R. (1986). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Barkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Horn, A. S., Hendel, D. D., & Fry, G. W. (2007). Ranking the international dimension of top research universities in the United States. Journal of Studies in International Education,11(3–4), 330–358. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horta, H., & Jung, J. (2013). Higher education research in Asia: A scientometric perspective. Higher Education Quarterly,67(4), 398–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, S. R., & Lovell, C. D. (2004). A review of methodological characteristics of research published in key journals in higher education: Implications for graduate research training. Research in Higher Education,45(4), 383–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, J., & Horta, H. (2013). Higher education research in Asia: A publication and co-publication analysis. Higher Education Quarterly,67(4), 398–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuh, G. D., Bean, J. P., Bradley, R. K., Coomes, M. D., & Hunter, D. E. (1986). Changes in research on college students published in selected journals between 1969 and 1983. The Review of Higher Education,9(2), 177–192.Google Scholar
Kuh, G. D., & Bursky, M. (1980). Knowledge dissemination by publication in student affairs: Who publishes what where? Journal of College Student Personnel,21(5), 387–393.Google Scholar
Kuzhabekova, A. (2011). Impact of co-authorship strategies on research productivity: A social-network analysis of publications in Russian cardiology. ProQuest, UMI Dissertation Publishing. (UMI No. 873550952), Retrieved September 2, 2013, from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses.Google Scholar
Kuzma, J., & Kuzhabekova, A. (2011, September). A window into the field of biotechnology risk analysis: A bibliometric approach. Paper presented at the Atlanta conference on science and innovation policy 2011, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved September 26–28, 2011 from https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/42455.
Milam, J. H, Jr. (1991). The presence of paradigms in the core higher education journal literature. Research in Higher Education,32(6), 651–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Observatoire des Sciences et de Techniques (2009). Methodological note: Bibliometrics as a tool for the analysis of the scientific production of a country. ESTIME. Retrieved April 20th, 2015 from http://www.estime.ird.fr/article268.html.
Sakamoto, R., & Chapman, D. W. (Eds.). (2010). Cross-border partnerships in higher education: Strategies and issues. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Silverman, R. J. (1985). Higher education as a maturing field? Evidence from referencing practices. Research in Higher Education,23(2), 150–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar