Increasing Success Rates in Developmental Math: The Complementary Role of Individual and Institutional Characteristics
This study tracks students’ progression through developmental math sequences and defines progression as both attempting and passing each level of the sequence. A model of successful progression in developmental education was built utilizing individual-, institutional-, and developmental math-level factors. Employing step-wise logistic regression models, we found that while each additional step improves model fit, the largest proportion of variance is explained by individual-level characteristics, and more variance is explained in attempting each level than passing that level. We identify specific individual and institutional factors associated with higher attempt (e.g., Latino) and passing rates (e.g., small class size) in the different courses of the developmental math trajectory. These findings suggest that colleges should implement programs and policies to increase attempt rates in developmental courses in order to increase passing rates of the math pre-requisite courses for specific certificates, associate degrees or transfer.
KeywordsDevelopmental education Community colleges Math education
The research reported here was supported by the Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education, through Grant R305A100381 to the University of Southern California. Additional support was received from an internal grant from the Advancing Scholarship in the Humanities and Social Sciences (ASHSS) Initiative of the University of Southern California, Office of the Provost.
- Bailey, T. (2009b). Rethinking remedial education in community college. New York, NY: Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2007). Institutional responses to reduce inequalities in college outcomes: Remedial and developmental courses in Higher Education. In S. Dickert-Conlin & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Economic Inequality in higher education: access, persistence, and success. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation Press.Google Scholar
- Boatman, A., & Long, B. T. (2010). Does remediation work for all students? How the effects of postsecondary remedial and developmental courses vary by level of academic preparation (NCPR Working Paper). New York, NY: National Center for Postsecondary Research.Google Scholar
- Breneman, D., & Harlow, W. (1998). Remedial education: Costs and consequences. Fordham Report, 2(9), 1–22.Google Scholar
- California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office. (1999). Understanding funding, finance and budgeting: A manager’s handbook. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED432331.pdf.
- California Community Colleges Chancellor’s Office. (2011). Basic skills accountability: Supplement to the ARCC Report. Retrieved from http://californiacommunitycolleges.cccco.edu/Portals/0/reportsTB/2011_Basic_Skills_Accountability_Report_[Final]_Combined.pdf.
- Chen, H. (2005). First generation students in postsecondary education: A look at their college transcripts (NCES 2005-171). Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Choy, S. P. (2002). Access and persistence: Findings from 10 years of longitudinal research on students. Washington, DC: American Council on Education, Center for Policy Analysis.Google Scholar
- Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (2008). The American community college (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Fike, D. S., & Fike, R. (2007). Does faculty employment status impact developmental mathematics outcomes? Journal of Developmental Education, 31(1), 2–11.Google Scholar
- Gándara, P., Alvarado, E., Driscoll, A., & Orfield, G. (2012). Building pathways to transfer: Community colleges that break the chain of failure for students of color. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
- Glenn, D., & Wagner, W. (2006). Cost and consequences of remedial course enrollment in Ohio public higher education: Six-year outcomes for fall 1998 cohort. Paper presented at the Association of Institutional Research Forum, Chicago. Retrieved from http://regents.ohio.gov/perfrpt/special_reports/Remediation_Consequences_2006.pdf.
- Grubb, W. N. (2012). Basic skills education in community colleges: Inside and outside of classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Hawley, T. H., & Harris, T. A. (2005–2006). Student characteristics related to persistence for first-year community college students. Journal of College Student Retention, 7(1–2), 117–142.Google Scholar
- Horn, L., & Nevill, S. (2006). Profile of undergraduates in U.S. postsecondary education institutions: 2003–04: With a special analysis of community college students (NCES-184). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
- Large Urban Community College District, Office of Institutional Research. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.LUCCD.edu/ (pseudonym).
- Lazarick, L. (1997). Back to the basics: Remedial education. Community College Journal, 68, 11–15.Google Scholar
- Legislative Analyst’s Office. (2012). The 2012-13 budget: Analysis of the Governor’s higher education proposal. Retrieved from http://www.lao.ca.gov/analysis/2012/highered/higher-ed-020812.aspx.
- Martorell, P., McFarlin Jr., I., & Xue, Y. (2013). Does failing a placement exam discourage underprepared students from going to college? (NPC Working paper #11-14). University of Michigan: National Poverty Center.Google Scholar
- Melguizo, T., Bos, H., & Prather, G. (2013). Using a regression discontinuity design to estimate the impact of placement decisions in developmental math in Los Angeles Community College District (LACCD). (CCCC Working Paper). Rossier School of Education, University of Southern California: California Community College Collaborative. Retrieved from http://www.uscrossier.org/pullias/research/projects/sc-community-college/.
- Melguizo, T., & Kosiewicz, H. (2013). The role of race, income, and funding on student success: An institutional level analysis of California community colleges. In The Century Foundation Task Force on Preventing Community Colleges from Becoming Separate and Unequal (Ed.), Bridging the higher education divide: Strengthening community colleges and restoring the American dream (pp. 137–156). New York, NY: The Century Foundation.Google Scholar
- Ngo, F., & Kwon, F. (2014). Using multiple measures to make math placement decisions: Implications for access and success in community colleges. Research in Higher Education. Google Scholar
- Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Perry, M., Bahr, P. R., Rosin, M., & Woodward, K. M. (2010). Course-taking patterns, policies, and practices in developmental education in the California community colleges. Mountain View, CA: EdSource. Retrieved from http://www.edsource.org/assets/files/ccstudy/FULL-CC-DevelopmentalCoursetaking.pdf.
- Safran, S., & Visher, M. G. (2010). Case studies of three community colleges: The policy and practice of assessing and placing students in developmental education courses (NCPR Working Paper). New York, NY: National Center for Postsecondary Research, Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Strong American Schools. (2008). Diploma to nowhere. Retrieved from http://www.edin08.com.
- Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (2013). Developmental education best practices. Retrieved from http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/download.cfm?downloadfile=B85F46FD-F0A7-A0E7-53324B738D5631E3&typename=dmFile&fieldname=filename.
- U. S. Department of Education. (1994). National Center for Educational Statistics, Report on the state of remedial education, 1992–1993. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar