Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 56, Issue 7, pp 750–776 | Cite as

Belonging and Academic Engagement Among Undergraduate STEM Students: A Multi-institutional Study

  • Denise Wilson
  • Diane Jones
  • Fraser Bocell
  • Joy Crawford
  • Mee Joo Kim
  • Nanette Veilleux
  • Tamara Floyd-Smith
  • Rebecca Bates
  • Melani Plett
Article

Abstract

This study examined the links between multiple levels of belonging and forms of behavioral and emotional engagement among STEM undergraduates in five geographically and culturally distinct institutions in the United States. Data were gathered from a survey specifically designed to capture the links between these key elements of the undergraduate experience. Results from over 1500 student participants in the survey clearly supported the importance of belonging for behavioral and emotional engagement in STEM courses when measured in the context of the classroom. The most consistent and significant links among models for the five participating institutions occurred between belonging at the class level and positive emotional engagement, while the least frequent and least consistent occurred between belonging to the university and all forms of engagement. Patterns of association to engagement were also similar for belonging and self-efficacy. The results of this study confirm the importance of belonging in the STEM classroom context and provide additional insights into the concurrent importance of self-efficacy in supporting student engagement. These results also demonstrate that belonging is a distinct attribute related to engagement and is not simply reducible to feelings of self-efficacy.

Keywords

STEM Belonging Engagement Self-efficacy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for their support of this work under the REESE program (Grant numbers DRL-0909817, 0910143, 0909659, 0909900, and 0909850). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

References

  1. Anderson-Butcher, D., & Conroy, D. E. (2002). Factorial and criterion validity of scores of a measure of belonging in youth development programs. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 62(5), 857–876.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.Google Scholar
  3. Astin, A. W. (1993a). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Astin, A. W. (1993b). What matters in College? Liberal Education, 79(4), 4–15.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  6. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bollen, K. A., & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A perceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69, 479–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brainard, S. G., & Carlin, L. (1998). A six-year longitudinal study of undergraduate women in engineering and science. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(4), 369–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carini, R. M., Kuh, G. D., & Klein, S. P. (2006). Student engagement and student learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carnegie Foundation (2010). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Retrieved from: http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/.
  11. Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chief Information Officers Council. (2010). Net generation guide: Preparing for change in the federal information technology workforce. Retrieved from: http://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/netgenimages/NetGenerationGuide.pdf.
  13. Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. Gunnar, Megan R. (Ed); Sroufe, L. Alan (Ed), in Self processes and development. The Minnesota symposia on child psychology, vol. 23., (pp. 43-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
  14. DeNeui, D. L. (2003). An investigation of first-year college students’ psychological sense of community on campus. College Student Journal, 37(2), 224–234.Google Scholar
  15. Fantz, T., Siller, T., & DeMiranda, M. (2011). Pre-collegiate factors influencing the self-efficacy of engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 604–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Floyd-Smith, T., Wilson, D., Campbell, R., Veilleux, N., Bates, R., Plett, M., et al. (2010). A multiinstitutional study of connection, community, and engagement in STEM education: Conceptual model development. In Proceedings of the ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education) Conference, Arlington, VA, June 2010.Google Scholar
  17. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeman, T. M., Anderman, L. H., & Jensen, J. M. (2007). Sense of belonging in college freshmen at the classroom and campus levels. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53, 229–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gellin, A. (2003). The effect of undergraduate student involvement on critical thinking: A meta-analysis of the literature 1991-2000. Journal of College Student Development, 44(6), 746–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Getz, M., Siegfried, J., & Australia, S. (2010). What does intercollegiate athletics do to or for colleges and universities? In Leo Kahane & Stephen Shmanske (Eds.), The oxford handbook of sports economics, Volume 1: The economics of sports. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30(1), 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Handelsman, M. M., Briggs, W. L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hausmann, L. R., Schofield, J. W., & Woods, R. L. (2007). Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and White first-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 803–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hughes, R., & Pace, C. R. (2003). Using NSSE to study student retention and withdrawal. Assessment Update, 15(4), 1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hurtado, S., Chang, J. C., Sáenz, V. B., Espinosa, L. L., Cabrera, N. L., & Cerna, O. S. (2007). Predicting transition and adjustment to college: Minority biomedical and behavioral science students’ first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 841–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnson, D. R. (2011). Examining sense of belonging and campus racial diversity experiences among women of color in STEM living-learning programs. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 17(3), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jordan, K. L., & Sorby, S. A. (2012). Pilot intervention to improve sense of belonging of minorities in engineering. In Proceedings from ASEE 2012: American Society of Engineering Education Conference. Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
  30. Kinzie, J., Gonyea, R., Shoup, R., & Kuh, G. (2008). Promoting persistence and success of underrepresented students: Lessons for teaching and learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 115, 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J.A, Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/npec/pdf/kuh_team_report.pdf.
  33. Locks, A. M., Hurtado, S., Bowman, N. A., & Oseguera, L. (2008). Extending notions of campus climate and diversity to students’ transition to college. The Review of Higher Education, 31(3), 257–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lounsbury, J. W., & De Neui, D. (1996). Collegiate psychological sense of community in relation to size of college/university and extroversion. Journal of Community Psychology, 24(4), 381–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lounsbury, J. W., & DeNeui, D. (1995). Psychological sense of community on campus. College Student Journal, 29, 270–277.Google Scholar
  36. Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2009). Women engineering students and self-efficacy: A multi-year, multi-institution study of women engineering student self-efficacy. Journal of Engineering Education, 98, 27–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marra, R. M., Rodgers, K. A., Shen, D., & Bogue, B. (2012). Leaving engineering: A multi-year single institution study. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 6–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maslow, A. H., & Lowry, R. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  39. McCarthy, M. E., Pretty, G. M., & Catano, V. (1990). Psychological sense of community and student burnout. Journal of College Student Development, 31(3), 211–216.Google Scholar
  40. Miserandino, M. (1996). Children who do well in school: Individual differences in perceived competence and autonomy in above-average children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(2), 203–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Museus, S. D., & Maramba, D. C. (2010). The impact of culture on Filipino American students’ sense of belonging. The Review of Higher Education, 34(2), 231–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nelson Laird, T. F. N., Chen, D., & Kuh, G. D. (2008). Classroom practices at institutions with higher-than-expected persistence rates: What student engagement data tell us. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 115, 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Brien, L. T., Mars, D. E., & Eccleston, C. (2011). System-justifying ideologies and academic outcomes among first-year Latino college students. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17(4), 406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ostrove, J. M., & Long, S. M. (2007). Social class and belonging: Implications for college adjustment. Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pajares, F. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 543–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Retrieved from: http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html.
  47. Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  48. Pike, G., & Killian, T. (2001). Reported gains in student learning: Do academic disciplines make a difference? Research in Higher Education, 42(4), 429–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pintrich, P. R., & DeGroot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive vailidity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ponton, M., Edmister, J., Ukeiley, L., & Seiner, J. (2001). Understanding the role of self-efficacy in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(2), 247–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rocca, K. A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education, 59(2), 185–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2005). Does what we feel affect what we learn? Some answers and new questions. Learning and Instruction, 15, 507–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stevens, J. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  55. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  56. Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of educational research, 45(1), 89–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Walton, G. M., Cohen, G. L., Cwir, D., & Spencer, S. J. (2012). Mere belonging: The power of social connections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 513–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wolf-Wendel, L., Ward, K., & Kinzie, J. (2009). A tangled web of terms: The overlap and unique contribution of involvement, engagement, and integration to understanding college student success. Journal of College Student Development, 50(4), 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zumbrunn, S., McKim, C., Buhs, E., & Hawley, L.R. (2014). Support, belonging, motivation, and engagement in the college classroom: A mixed method study. Instructional Science. doi: 10.1007/s11251-014-9310-0.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Denise Wilson
    • 1
  • Diane Jones
    • 2
  • Fraser Bocell
    • 2
  • Joy Crawford
    • 2
  • Mee Joo Kim
    • 2
  • Nanette Veilleux
    • 3
  • Tamara Floyd-Smith
    • 4
  • Rebecca Bates
    • 5
  • Melani Plett
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.College of EducationUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mathematics, Statistics & Computer ScienceBostonUSA
  4. 4.Department of Chemical EngineeringTuskegee UniversityTuskegeeUSA
  5. 5.Department of Computer ScienceMinnesota State University, MankatoMankatoUSA
  6. 6.School of EngineeringSeattle Pacific UniversitySeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations