Belonging and Academic Engagement Among Undergraduate STEM Students: A Multi-institutional Study
- 2.1k Downloads
This study examined the links between multiple levels of belonging and forms of behavioral and emotional engagement among STEM undergraduates in five geographically and culturally distinct institutions in the United States. Data were gathered from a survey specifically designed to capture the links between these key elements of the undergraduate experience. Results from over 1500 student participants in the survey clearly supported the importance of belonging for behavioral and emotional engagement in STEM courses when measured in the context of the classroom. The most consistent and significant links among models for the five participating institutions occurred between belonging at the class level and positive emotional engagement, while the least frequent and least consistent occurred between belonging to the university and all forms of engagement. Patterns of association to engagement were also similar for belonging and self-efficacy. The results of this study confirm the importance of belonging in the STEM classroom context and provide additional insights into the concurrent importance of self-efficacy in supporting student engagement. These results also demonstrate that belonging is a distinct attribute related to engagement and is not simply reducible to feelings of self-efficacy.
KeywordsSTEM Belonging Engagement Self-efficacy
The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the National Science Foundation for their support of this work under the REESE program (Grant numbers DRL-0909817, 0910143, 0909659, 0909900, and 0909850). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
- Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.Google Scholar
- Astin, A. W. (1993a). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Astin, A. W. (1993b). What matters in College? Liberal Education, 79(4), 4–15.Google Scholar
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
- Carnegie Foundation (2010). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Retrieved from: http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/.
- Chief Information Officers Council. (2010). Net generation guide: Preparing for change in the federal information technology workforce. Retrieved from: http://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/netgenimages/NetGenerationGuide.pdf.
- Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy, and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. Gunnar, Megan R. (Ed); Sroufe, L. Alan (Ed), in Self processes and development. The Minnesota symposia on child psychology, vol. 23., (pp. 43-77). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- DeNeui, D. L. (2003). An investigation of first-year college students’ psychological sense of community on campus. College Student Journal, 37(2), 224–234.Google Scholar
- Floyd-Smith, T., Wilson, D., Campbell, R., Veilleux, N., Bates, R., Plett, M., et al. (2010). A multiinstitutional study of connection, community, and engagement in STEM education: Conceptual model development. In Proceedings of the ASEE (American Society for Engineering Education) Conference, Arlington, VA, June 2010.Google Scholar
- Getz, M., Siegfried, J., & Australia, S. (2010). What does intercollegiate athletics do to or for colleges and universities? In Leo Kahane & Stephen Shmanske (Eds.), The oxford handbook of sports economics, Volume 1: The economics of sports. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Jordan, K. L., & Sorby, S. A. (2012). Pilot intervention to improve sense of belonging of minorities in engineering. In Proceedings from ASEE 2012: American Society of Engineering Education Conference. Atlanta, Georgia.Google Scholar
- Kuh, G.D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J.A, Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J C. (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/npec/pdf/kuh_team_report.pdf.
- Lounsbury, J. W., & DeNeui, D. (1995). Psychological sense of community on campus. College Student Journal, 29, 270–277.Google Scholar
- Maslow, A. H., & Lowry, R. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
- McCarthy, M. E., Pretty, G. M., & Catano, V. (1990). Psychological sense of community and student burnout. Journal of College Student Development, 31(3), 211–216.Google Scholar
- Pajares, F. (2002). Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. Retrieved from: http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/eff.html.
- Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Stevens, J. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
- Zumbrunn, S., McKim, C., Buhs, E., & Hawley, L.R. (2014). Support, belonging, motivation, and engagement in the college classroom: A mixed method study. Instructional Science. doi: 10.1007/s11251-014-9310-0.