Student Evaluation of Instruction: In the New Paradigm of Distance Education
- 1.2k Downloads
Distance education has experienced soaring development over the last decade. With millions of students in higher education enrolling in distance education, it becomes critically important to understand student learning and experiences with online education. Based on a large sample of 11,351 students taught by 1,522 instructors from 29 colleges and universities, this study investigates the factors that impact student evaluation of instruction in distance education, using a two-level hierarchical model. Key findings reveal that in a distance education setting, gender and class size are no longer significant predictors of quality of instruction. However, factors such as reasons for taking the course, student class status and instructor’s academic rank have a significant impact on student evaluation of learning and instruction. Findings from this study offer important implications for institutional administrators on utilizing the evaluation results and on developing strategies to help faculty become effective online instructors.
KeywordsDistance education eSIR Hierarchical linear modeling Learning outcomes Student evaluation of instruction
- Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Learning on demand: Online education in the United States, 2009. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium.Google Scholar
- Centra, J. A. (2005). Will teachers receive higher student evaluations by giving higher grades and less coursework?. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
- Centra, J. A. (2006). The Student Instructional Report II: Its development, uses and supporting research. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
- Centra, J. A., & Gaubatz, N. B. (2000b). Student perceptions of learning and instructional effectiveness in college courses. Research Rep., No. 9, The Student Instructional Report II. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
- Centra, J. A., & Gaubatz, N. B. (2002). Student Perceptions of Learning and Instructional Effectiveness in College Courses: A Validity Study of SIR II. ETS SIR Report No. 9. Princeton: NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
- Chamberlin, M. S., & Hickey, J. S. (2001). Student evaluations of faculty performance: The role of gender expectations in differential evaluations. Educational Research Quarterly, 25(2), 3–14.Google Scholar
- Davies, R. S., Howell, S. L., & Petrie, J. A. (2010). A review of trends in distance education scholarship at research universities in North America, 1998–2007. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 11(3), 42–56.Google Scholar
- Educational Testing Service. (1998). Student Instructional Report II, comparative Data, 1995–1997. For four-year colleges and universities for two-year colleges. Princeton, NJ: Higher Education Assessment Program.Google Scholar
- Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Knight, J., Ridley, D. R., & Davies, E. (1998). Assessment of student academic achievement in online programs. Paper presented at the 38th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
- Liaw, S., & Goh, K. (2003). Evidence and control of biases in student evaluations of teaching. The International Journal of Educational Management, 17(1), 37–43.Google Scholar
- Marsh, H. W., & Dunkin, M. J. (1992). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 8, pp. 143–233). New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
- McMahan, T. V., & Loyola, M. (2011). College 2.0: Transforming higher education through greater innovation and smarter regulation. Washington, DC: Institute for a Competitive Workforce.Google Scholar
- Muthen, L. K., & Muthen, B. (2004). Mplus: The comprehensive modeling program for applied researchers. Los Angeles, CA: Muthen & Muthen.Google Scholar
- Parry, M. (2010a). Tomorrow’s college. Retrieved November 3, 2010, from http://chronicle.com/article/Tomorrows-College/125120/.
- Parry, M. (2010b). News analysis: Is ‘Wal-Mart u.’ a good bargain for students? Retrieved November 3, 2010, from http://chronicle.com/article/Is-Wal-Mart-U-a-Good/65933/.
- Pike, G. (2004). The Student Instructional Report for distance education: e-SIR II. Assessment Update, 16(4), 11–12.Google Scholar
- Theall, M., & Franklin, J. (2001). Looking for bias in all the wrong places: A search for truth or a witch hunt in student ratings of instructions. In M. Theall, P. C. Abrami, & L. A. Mets (Eds.), New directions for institutional research: No. 109. The student ratings debate: Are they valid? How can we best use them? (pp. 45–56). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar