Bachelor’s Degree Completion Across State Contexts: Does the Distribution of Enrollments Make a Difference?

Article

Abstract

Growing accountability pressures, accompanied by a lack of readily accessible measures of institutional performance, have led to an increasing focus on graduation rates. Although previous research has illuminated myriad factors influencing students’ likelihood of educational success, it has not paid adequate attention to how state contexts may shape student outcomes. I build on the small but growing body of research exploring the role of state characteristics in facilitating student success in higher education. Controlling for a range of state and individual attributes, I examine how one aspect of the state context––the distribution of enrollments in 2 vs. 4-year public institutions––is related to bachelor’s degree attainment of students attending public 4-year colleges and universities. The results suggest that the larger the proportion of students attending community colleges in a state, the higher the probability of bachelor’s degree attainment at public 4-year institutions. This appears to be a product of student sorting: the presence of community colleges facilitates sorting of students into higher education in a way that is associated with higher degree completion at public 4-year institutions. These findings have important implications for research on student outcomes and policies aimed at evaluating the performance of public 4-year institutions.

Keywords

Higher education Educational attainment Community college State context 

References

  1. Alfonso, M. (2006). The impact of community college attendance on baccalaureate attainment. Research in Higher Education, 47, 873–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks: Sage University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, G. M., Sun, J. C., & Alfonso, M. (2006). Effectiveness of statewide articulation agreements on the probability of transfer: A preliminary policy analysis. Review of Higher Education, 29, 261–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archibald, R. B., & Feldman, D. H. (2008). Graduation rates and accountability: Regressions versus production frontiers. Research in Higher Education, 49, 80–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arum, R. (1996). Do private schools force public schools to compete? American Sociological Review, 61, 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Astin, A. W. (1993). College retention rates are often misleading. The Chronicle of Higher Education, September 22, A48.Google Scholar
  7. Astin, A. W. (1997). How “good” is your institution’s retention rate? Research in Higher Education, 38, 647–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berger, M. C., & Kostal, T. (2002). Financial resources, regulation, and enrollment in US public higher education. Economics of Education Review, 21, 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brint, S., & Karabel, J. (1989). The diverted dream: Community colleges and the promise of educational opportunity in America, 1900–1985. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Carey, K. (2004). A matter of degrees: Improving graduation rates in 4-year colleges and universities. Washington DC: The Education Trust.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, B. R. (1960). The ‘cooling-out’ function in higher education. American Journal of Sociology, 65, 569–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cohen, A. M. (1994). Analyzing community college transfer rates. In A. M. Cohen (Ed.), Relating curriculum and transfer. New directions for community colleges, No. 86 (pp. 71–79). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, A. M. (1996). Orderly thinking about a chaotic system. In T. Rifkin (Ed.), Transfer and articulation: Improving policies to meet new needs. New directions for community colleges, No. 96 (pp. 25–34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1975). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Dougherty, K. J. (1992). Community colleges and baccalaureate attainment. Journal of Higher Education, 63, 188–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goenner, C. F., & Snaith, S. M. (2004). Accounting for model uncertainty in the prediction of university graduation rates. Research in Higher Education, 45, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hauptman, A. M. (2001). Reforming the ways in which states finances higher education. In D. E. Heller (Ed.), The states and public higher education policy (pp. 64–80). Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Hearn, J. C., Griswold, C. P., & Marine, G. M. (1996). Region, resources, and reason: A contextual analysis of state tuition and student aid policies. Research in Higher Education, 37, 241–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heller, D. E. (1999). The effects of tuition and state financial aid on public college enrollment. Review of Higher Education, 23, 65–89.Google Scholar
  20. Heller, D. E. (2006). Merit aid and college access. Symposium on the consequences of merit-based student aid. Wisconsin Center for the Advancement of Postsecondary Education, University of Wisconsin, Madison.Google Scholar
  21. Kane, T. J. (1995). Rising public college tuition and college entry: How well do public subsidies promote access to college?. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER Working Paper No. 5164.Google Scholar
  22. Kipp, S. M., I. I. I., Price, D. V., & Wohlford, J. K. (2002). Unequal opportunity: Disparities in college access among the 50 states. Indianapolis: Lumina Foundation for Education.Google Scholar
  23. Leigh, D. E., & Gill, A. M. (2003). Do community colleges really divert students from earning bachelor’s degrees. Economics of Education Review, 22, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  25. McGuinness, A. C., Jr. (1994). State postsecondary education structure handbook. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
  26. McLendon, M. K., Hearn, J. C., & Deaton, R. (2006). Called to account: Analyzing the origins and spread of state performance-accountability policies for higher education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Monk-Turner, E. (1995). Factors shaping the probability of community versus 4-year college entrance and acquisition of the B.A. degree. The Social Science Journal, 32, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. National Association of State Scholarship and Grant Programs. (1993). Annual survey report 1992–1993 academic year. Harrisburg, PA: Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency.Google Scholar
  29. National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (1994). Digest of education statistics. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  30. National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2002). NELS 1988: Base-year to fourth follow-up date file user’s manual (NCES 2002–323). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  31. National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2003a). Descriptive summary of 1995–96 beginning postsecondary students: Six years later (NCES 2003–151). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  32. National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2003b). Postsecondary attainment, attendance, curriculum, and performance (NCES 2003–394). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  33. National Center for Education Statistics [NCES]. (2007). Digest of education statistics. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  34. National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (2002). Losing ground: A national status report on the affordability of American higher education. San Jose, CA: National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education.Google Scholar
  35. Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students: A third decade of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  36. Paulsen, M. B., & St. John, E. P. (2002). Social class and college costs: Examining the financial nexus between college choice and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 73, 189–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perna, L. W. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 99–157). The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  38. Perna, L. W., Rowan-Kenyon, H., Bell, A., Thomas, S. L., & Li, C. (2008). A typology of federal and state programs designed to promote college enrollment. Journal of Higher Education, 79, 243–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Perna, L. W., & Thomas, S. L. (2008). Theoretical perspectives on student success: Understanding the contributions of the disciplines. ASHE higher education report (Vol. 34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  40. Perna, L. W., & Titus, M. A. (2004). Understanding differences in the choice of college attended: The role of state public policies. Review of Higher Education, 27, 501–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Quigley, J. M., & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1993). Public choices in public higher education. In C. T. Clotfelter & M. Rothschild (Eds.), Studies of supply and demand in higher education (pp. 243–283). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  42. Roksa, J. (2009). Building bridges for student success: Are higher education articulation policies effective? Teachers College Record, 111 (in press).Google Scholar
  43. Roksa, J., & Keith, B. (2008). Credits, time, and attainment: Articulation policies and success after transfer. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30, 236–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rouse, C. E. (1995). Democratization or diversion? The effect of community colleges on educational attainment. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 13, 217–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rouse, C. E. (1998). Do two-year colleges increase overall educational attainment? Evidence from the states. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 17, 595–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Scott, M., Bailey, T., & Kienzl, G. (2006). Relative success? Determinants of college graduation rates in public and private colleges in the U.S. Research in Higher Education, 47, 249–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. St. John, E. P. (2003). Refinancing the college dream: Access, equal opportunity, and justice for taxpayers. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  48. St. John, E. P., Chung, C. G., Musoba, G. D., & Simmons, A. B. (2004a). Financial access: The impact of state finance strategies. In E. P. St. John (Ed.), Public policy and college access: Investigating the federal and state roles in equalizing postsecondary opportunity (pp. 131–152). New York: AMS Press Inc.Google Scholar
  49. St. John, E. P., Musoba, G. D., & Chung, C. G. (2004b). Academic access: The impact of state education policies. In E. P. St. John (Ed.), Public policy and college access: Investigating the federal and state roles in equalizing postsecondary opportunity (pp. 131–152). New York: AMS Press Inc.Google Scholar
  50. The Chronicle of Higher Education. (2008). The 2007–08 Almanac (Vol. 54). Washington DC: The Chronicle of Higher Education.Google Scholar
  51. The Secretary of Education’s Commission on the Future of Higher Education. (2006). A test of leadership: Charting the future of U.S. higher education. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  52. Thomas, S. L., & Heck, R. H. (2001). Analysis of large-scale secondary data in higher education research: Potential perils associated with complex sampling design. Research in Higher Education, 42, 517–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Titus, M. A. (2006). No college student left behind: The influence of financial aspects of a state’s higher education policy on college completion. Review of Higher Education, 29, 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. U.S. Census Bureau. (1994). Statistical abstract of the U.S. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  55. Volkwein, J. F., & Tandberg, D. A. (2008). Measuring up: Examining the connections among state structural characteristics, regulatory practices, and performance. Research in Higher Education, 49, 180–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weerts, D. J., & Ronca, J. M. (2006). Examining differences in state support for higher education: A comparative study of state appropriations for research I universities. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 935–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Whitaker, D. G., & Pascarella, E. T. (1994). Two-year college attendance and socioeconomic attainment: Some additional evidence. Journal of Higher Education, 65, 194–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of VirginiaCharlottesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations