Advertisement

Research in Higher Education

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 189–214 | Cite as

Diversifying Science: Underrepresented Student Experiences in Structured Research Programs

  • Sylvia HurtadoEmail author
  • Nolan L. Cabrera
  • Monica H. Lin
  • Lucy Arellano
  • Lorelle L. Espinosa
Article

Abstract

Targeting four institutions with structured science research programs for undergraduates, this study focuses on how underrepresented students experience science. Several key themes emerged from focus group discussions: learning to become research scientists, experiences with the culture of science, and views on racial and social stigma. Participants spoke of essential factors for becoming a scientist, but their experiences also raised complex issues about the role of race and social stigma in scientific training. Students experienced the collaborative and empowering culture of science, exhibited strong science identities and high self-efficacy, while developing directed career goals as a result of “doing science” in these programs.

Keywords

Undergraduate science research Racial/ethnic minorities Stigma Identity Self-efficacy 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was made possible by the support of the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, NIH Grant Number 1 RO1 GMO71968-01. This independent research and the views expressed here do not indicate endorsement by the sponsor.

References

  1. Abraham, J. P., Lujan, S. S., López, E. E., & Walker, M. T. (2002). Graduating students’ perceptions of outcomes of college experiences at a predominantly Hispanic university. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 1(3), 267–276.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, W. R. (1992). The color of success: African-American college student outcomes at predominantly white and historically black public colleges and universities. Harvard Education Review, 62(1), 26–44.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, W. R., Epps, E. G., & Haniff, N. Z. (1991). College in Black and White: African American students in predominantly white and historically black public universities. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  4. American Association of Colleges & Universities. (2007). Making excellence inclusive. Retrieved June 2007 from www.aacu.org/inclusive_excellence/index.cfm.
  5. Anaya, G., & Cole, D. (2001). Latina/o student achievement: Exploring the influence of student-faculty interaction on college grades. Journal of College Student Development, 42(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
  6. Astin, A. W. (1993). What matters in college? Four critical years revisited. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  7. Augustine, N. R. (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Retrieved March 19, 2008 from http://www.commerce.senate.gov/pdf/augustine-031506.pdf.
  8. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
  9. Barlow, A. E. L., & Villarejo, M. (2004). Making a difference for minorities: Evaluation of an educational enrichment program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 861–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bazeley, P. (2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Biological and Biomedical Sciences. (2006). African-American baccalaureate. Diverse, 23(8), 54.Google Scholar
  12. Bronowski, J. (1972). Science and human values. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experience of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carnavale, A. P., & Fry, R. A. (1999). Crossing the great divide: Can we achieve equity when generation Y goes to college? Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.Google Scholar
  15. Center for Institutional Data Exchange Analysis. (2000). 1999–2000 SMET retention report. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
  16. Chang, M. J., Cerna, O. S., Han, J., & Sáenz, V. (2008). The contradictory roles of institutional status in retaining underrepresented minorities in biomedical and behavioral science majors. The Review of Higher Education, 31(4), 433–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cole, D. (2007). Do interracial interactions matter? An examination of student-faculty contact and intellectual self-concept. Journal of Higher Education, 78(3), 248–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cole, D., & Espinoza, A. (2008). Examining the academic success of Latino students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Student Development, 49(4), 285–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. The College Board. (2005). 2005 College-bound seniors: Total group profile report. Retrieved February 25, 2008 from http://www.collegeboard.com/prod_downloads/about/news_info/cbsenior/yr2005/2005-college-bound-seniors.pdf.
  20. Contreras, F. E., Malcolm, L. E., & Bensimon, E. M. (2008). Hispanic-serving institutions: Closeted identity and the production of equitable outcomes for Latina/o students. In M. Gasman, B. Baez, & C. S. V. Turner (Eds.), Understanding minority institutions (pp. 71–90). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  21. Council of Graduate Schools. (2007). Graduate education: The backbone of American competitiveness and innovation. A report from the council of graduate schools advisory committee on graduate education and American competitiveness. Washington, DC: Council of Graduate Schools.Google Scholar
  22. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods, approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Dirks, C., & Cunningham, M. (2006). Enhancing diversity in science: Is teaching science process skills the answer? CBE—Life Sciences Education, 5, 218–226.Google Scholar
  24. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.Google Scholar
  25. Epstein, D. (2006, July 26). So that’s why they’re leaving (Inside higher ed.) Retrieved February 2, 2007 from http://insidehighered.com/news/2006/07/26/scipipeline.
  26. Fries-Britt, S. (1998). Moving beyond Black achiever isolation: Experiences of gifted Black collegians. The Journal of Higher Education, 69(5), 556–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gándara, P., & Maxwell-Jolly, J. (1999). Priming the pump: Strategies for increasing the achievement of underrepresented minority undergraduates. New York: The College Board.Google Scholar
  28. Harding, S. (Ed.). (1993). The ‘racial’ economy of science: Toward a democratic future. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Huang, G., Taddese, N., & Walter, E. (2000). Entry and persistence of women and minorities in college science and engineering education. Retrieved February 25, 2008 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000601.
  30. Hurtado, S., Cerna, O. S., Chang, J. C., Sáenz, V. B., Lopez, L. R., Mosqueda, C., et al. (2006). Aspiring scientists: Characteristics of college freshmen interested in the biomedical and behavioral sciences. Los Angeles, CA: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA.Google Scholar
  31. Hurtado, S., Han, J. C., Sáenz, V. B., Espinosa, L. L., Cabrera, N. L., & Cerna, O. S. (2007). Predicting transition and adjustment to college: Minority biomedical and behavioral science students’ first year of college. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 841–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hutchison, C. B., & Bailey, L. M. (2006). Cross-cultural perceptions of assessment of selected international science teachers in American high schools. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1, 657–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, S. R., Torres, V., & Arminio, J. (2006). Negotiating the complexities of qualitative research in higher education: Fundamental elements and issues. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Kardash, C. M. (2000). Evaluation of an undergraduate research experience: Perceptions of undergraduate interns and their faculty mentors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 191–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kinkead, J. (2003). Learning through inquiry: An overview of undergraduate research. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 93, 5–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laden, B. V. (2004). Hispanic-serving institutions: What are they? Where are they? Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28, 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis, B. F. (2003). A critique of the literature on the underrepresentation of African Americans in science: Directions for future research. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9, 361–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Li, X. (2007). Characteristics of minority-serving institutions and minority undergraduates enrolled in these institutions. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  39. Lopatto, D. (2003). The essential features of undergraduate research. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 23, 139–142.Google Scholar
  40. Lopatto, D. (2004). Survey of undergraduate research experiences (SURE): First findings. Cell Biology Education, 3(4), 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mabrouk, P. A., & Peters, K. (2000). Student perspectives on undergraduate research (UR) experiences in chemistry and biology. Retrieved February 25, 2008 from http://www.chem.vt.edu/confchem/2000/a/mabrouk/mabrouk.htm.
  42. Major, B., & O’Brien, L. T. (2005). The social psychology of stigma. Annual Review of Psychology, 56(1), 393–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Malcolm, L. E. (2008). Accumulating (dis)advantage: Institutional and financial aid pathways of Latina/o STEM baccalaureates. University of Southern California: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar
  44. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  45. National Institutes of Health. (2007). Research on interventions that promote research careers, RFA-GM-08-005. Retrieved August 2007, http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/rfa-files/RFA-GM-08-005.html.
  46. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2007). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (NSF 07–315). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  47. National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Statistics. (2004). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering (NSF 04–317). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
  48. Nicholas, D. (1997). Making more minority scientists. Environmental Health Perspectives, 105(2), 174–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Outcalt, C. L., & Skewes-Cox, T. E. (2002). Involvement and satisfaction: The human environment at HBCUs. Review of Higher Education, 25(3), 331–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oyserman, D., & Swim, J. K. (2001). Stigma: An insider’s view. Journal of Social Issues, 57(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Pascarella, E. T. (1985). College environmental influences on learning and cognitive development: A critical review and synthesis. In J. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 1, pp. 1–61). New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
  52. Provasnik, S., & Shafer, L. L. (2004). Historically black colleges and universities, 1976 to 2001. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  53. Sabatini, D. A. (1997). Teaching and research synergism: The undergraduate research experience. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 123, 98–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schneider, B. (2000). Explaining the unrealized aspirations of racial and ethnic minorities. In G. Campbell, R. Denes, & C. Morrison (Eds.), Access denied: Race, ethnicity, and the scientific enterprise (pp. 174–187). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Schuman, H., Steeh, C., Bobo, L., & Krysan, M. (1997). Racial attitudes in America: Trends and interpretations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. C. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  57. Seymour, E., Hunter, A., Laursen, S., & Deantoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88, 493–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shih, M. (2004). Positive stigma: Examining resilience and empowerment in overcoming stigma. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Treisman, P. U. (1985). A study of the mathematics achievement of Black students at the University of California, Berkeley. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, Professional Development Program.Google Scholar
  62. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). Hispanic serving institutions: Statistical trends from 1990 to 1999. Washington, D.C.: Author.Google Scholar
  63. Vetter, B. M. (1994). The next generation of scientists and engineers: Who’s in the pipeline? In W. Pearson Jr. & A. Fechter (Eds.), Who will do science? Educating the next generation (pp. 1–19). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  65. Zamani, E. M. (2003). African American women in higher education. New Directions for Student Services, 104, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sylvia Hurtado
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nolan L. Cabrera
    • 1
  • Monica H. Lin
    • 1
  • Lucy Arellano
    • 1
  • Lorelle L. Espinosa
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations